Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Captured on video: The moment a wind turbine exploded in gales
Daily Mail ^ | 2/25/2008

Posted on 02/25/2008 6:12:29 AM PST by Uncledave

Follow link to see old NEG-Micon machine going kablooie.

When winds get too strong, modern machines' blades pitch out of the wind, and the rotor is braked. (The old one in the video should have been braked as well - unclear why that failed).

I respect that many here oppose wind energy, but safety concerns isn't a strong argument for that case. Let's all please recognize that accidents can and do happen in any area of the energy industry.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: energy; wind
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 02/25/2008 6:12:32 AM PST by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker; Dementon; eraser2005; Calpernia; DTogo; Maelstrom; Yehuda; babble-on; ...
Renewable Energy Ping

Please Freep Mail me if you'd like on/off

2 posted on 02/25/2008 6:13:01 AM PST by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

bflv


3 posted on 02/25/2008 6:13:24 AM PST by SpinnerWebb (Islam ... If you can't join them, beat them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Well here in California the environmentalist are against them because they kill birds. There is no solution that will ever please the leftist. They are all about problems not solutions.


4 posted on 02/25/2008 6:16:05 AM PST by w1andsodidwe (Jimmy Carter allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

No one here “opposes” wind energy. You’re thinking of Eddie Kennedy.


5 posted on 02/25/2008 6:17:05 AM PST by subterfuge (1st choice: Hunter------2nd choice: Thompson-----3rd choice: there is no 3rd choice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

I support wind energy, but I oppose government distortions of the market that encourage its use. I am under no illusions that it could possibly replace fossil fuels or nuclear power as a viable way to run an industrialized economy. However, it has its uses in remote locations where power transmission is impractical, and as a backup power source when the grid fails.


6 posted on 02/25/2008 6:17:26 AM PST by coloradan (The US is becoming a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

That left a mark.....


7 posted on 02/25/2008 6:17:26 AM PST by egginanest ( "Never interrupt me when I'm trying to interrupt you." -Winston Churchill-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Pretty dramatic but as these things are not usually in any populated area I don’t see it a particularly dangerous either.

I saw on a Discovery channel program about a month ago that they are developing ones that look like a DNA string that is supposed to be able to handle any wind.


8 posted on 02/25/2008 6:18:37 AM PST by Hazcat (We won an immigration BATTLE, the WAR is not over. Be ever vigilant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Well designed wind turbines are supposed to lock off at anything above 35 knots - this one obviously did not!


9 posted on 02/25/2008 6:19:45 AM PST by melsec (A Proud Aussie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
I respect that many here oppose wind energy,

What an asinine statement. I don't know of anyone here who "opposes wind energy".

Lots of us oppose the completely artificial support it gets or wants to get from the taxpayer.

Lots of us think it's not capable of producing mainstream quantities of juice.

Does that make us "opponents" ??

10 posted on 02/25/2008 6:21:06 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w1andsodidwe

More birds are born than there is food for. If a bird runs into an object and dies (like the two who smashed into the side of my little house last year) than other birds will live because the competition for food was eliminated. Leftists amazingly see Darwinism in everything, without understanding the facts of nature his theory sites.


11 posted on 02/25/2008 6:21:09 AM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Put me on your list, please sir.


12 posted on 02/25/2008 6:21:24 AM PST by U S Army EOD (Say Cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

With anything humans make there will be mechanical failures.


13 posted on 02/25/2008 6:21:27 AM PST by Racer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Thanks Uncledave. I posted this thread and the link on the Michigan (FR) board today after hearing our governor Jenny Grandtheft talk up wind turbines this morning on WJR with Paul W. Smith (the guy who occasionally fill in for Rush). Per usual he was going right along with her. I figure next she’ll be calling for a new department in the state, a Department of Candles. /sarcasm

Dangerously Incompetent BUMP!


14 posted on 02/25/2008 6:22:33 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep

Check this out!


15 posted on 02/25/2008 6:24:14 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Didn’t a recent episode of “House, MD” start this way?


16 posted on 02/25/2008 6:24:45 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
I have no problem with wind turbines as energy source. I lived on a sailboat. However I do reject added taxes and costs on energy that is transfered to, and subsidizes turbine projects. I also reject using the force of law, "must buy energy from" deals that turbine ‘investors’ force on energy consumers. If the turbine energy people want to have multiple, mechanical, intermittent energy generating facilities, that may or may not, when there is or is not electrical demand, and run it as some sort of ‘we may or may not be able to give you power, at no predicable level, at no predictable time’ business. Fine. Good luck to them. Just don’t ask the rest of us, through government force, government schemes, taxes, fines, fees, permits, grants, subsidies or any other method to pay for your economically wacky enterprise.

We had a entire industry that ran on free, no polluting, wind power. Sailing ships. The got replaced because an entire look at the efficiencies and costs proved they were more expensive and less efficient. Same with power generation.

17 posted on 02/25/2008 6:24:52 AM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave


18 posted on 02/25/2008 6:26:26 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

I meant “oppose wind energy in its current support regime”.

better?


19 posted on 02/25/2008 6:27:07 AM PST by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Ping for later...


20 posted on 02/25/2008 6:27:10 AM PST by Friend_from_the_Frozen_North (If you are, as Rush would say, "A Glittering Jewel of Colossal Ignorance" don't waste my time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson