Skip to comments.Ron Paul says he raised nearly $20 million in final quarter of 2007
Posted on 01/01/2008 12:39:23 PM PST by rfaceEdited on 01/01/2008 12:48:40 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Ron Paul said today his presidential campaign raised nearly $20 million in the last three months of 2007 from 130,000 donors.
Ron Paul brought in nearly $5.3 million that quarter.
Paul's campaign said that more than 107,000 donors were new and the average donation was about $90. More than half of the total came from two 24-hour online fund-raising events organized by supporters -- one on Nov. 5, and the second centered in Boston on Dec. 16.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
paul is a traitor and a hypocrit, that being said my family and I will never vote for this buffoon
I love how the 2005 McCain n00b is trying to dictate FR policy.
probably party of Soros
You sure you want to add Aaron Zelman to the list of recommendations for Paul?
Its sad that a disagreement over policy makes someone a “traitor”. Disgusting attitude. If you really listened to the man, he backs his points up with logic and reason. You might not agree with all of his conclusions, but calling someone a traitor simply because he disagrees with you is repulsive.
Im glad that you rule your family with such an iron fist. Must be a heartwarming scene.
Huh? Have you watched any of the Ron Paul rallies on youtube.com? In a lot of them, Paul is out mingling with his supporters. He doesn't have handlers like Hillary, Obama & Edwards.
Now, how do you think that particular photo came about. Here are the 2 logical choices:
A) "Hey Dr Ron Paul, I'm Jamie Kelso, a white supremacist! Can I get a prominent photo taken with you?"
B) "Hey Dr Ron Paul, got a second for a pic?"
My point is that if Peden has been raising all this money y'all keep claiming, why can't they get a website on something other than "campaignsitebuilder.com"? Busch-league.
Yeah, it'll "play out" like all of the other smears against Paul.
You seem too conservative domestically to be a neo-con.
That is one of the funniest posts I have ever read on FR. Ever.
This place really has become a lot like DU -- people throwing around baseless accusations and name calling.
please endeavor to explain the logic and reason behind these comments, remembering that several states had seceded prior to Lincoln's inauguration.
REP. PAUL: Six hundred thousand Americans died in a senseless civil war. No, he shouldn't have gone, gone to war. He did this just to enhance and get rid of the original intent of the republic. I mean, it was the--that iron, iron fist.. Slavery was phased out in every other country of the world. And the way I'm advising that it should have been done is do like the British empire did. You, you buy the slaves and release them. How much would that cost compared to killing 600,000 Americans and where it lingered for 100 years? I mean, the hatred and all that existed. So every other major country in the world got rid of slavery without a civil war. I mean, that doesn't sound too radical to me. That sounds like a pretty reasonable approach.
Can Out of Staters donate to Chris Peden Campaign?
it’s easy to interpret his comments, however: he thinks Lincoln was a war criminal and hates him
Sure can.. every small amount helps.
I'll be glad to. A Republican candidate that openly talks about abolishing the IRS, limiting government, and getting us out of the UN is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
If the Republican Party would have taken up some of Paul's issues, Paul wouldn't be running and the GOP would be a lock to win the WH and would have kept control of Congress.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.