Posted on 11/20/2007 5:01:29 PM PST by V.Foster
My Theory - Based on Robert Novak's article that the Clinton camp has Scandalous Information on Obama - is this really "Mutually Assured Destruction?" You print story on me I will destroy Obama... and where will the Democrat Party be then?
I think many of us have forgotten how the Clinton's operate - what they say and do is all designed to fool you to what their real agenda is.
Is she really sending the LA Times a warning not to run the Huma story?
“if she is exposed, she will have no choice but to expose Obama and the Democrats will have to deal with two crippled candidates!”
I think you are on to something there!
Carpenter Love on the CAmpaign trail?
Can’t get the linked page to load.....
I think you may well be onto something — this would be an easy way for Shrillery’s camp to inform all of the MSM and ‘Rats that if any dirty laundry is aired for the PIAPS then it will be a disaster for Obama, too.
Of course, that would leave the Edwards camp with even more incentive to try to get any of this dirty laundry aired, unless Edwards is caught up in the M.A.D. calculations as well.
Can’t get the linked page to load.....
I think you may well be onto something — this would be an easy way for Shrillery’s camp to inform all of the MSM and ‘Rats that if any dirty laundry is aired for the PIAPS then it will be a disaster for Obama, too.
Of course, that would leave the Edwards camp with even more incentive to try to get any of this dirty laundry aired, unless Edwards is caught up in the M.A.D. calculations as well.
Poor choice of words when referring to a lesbian.
Oh stop it!
Don’t you dare go getting my hopes up!
This would be too good to be true! (fingers crossed, hoping you’re right!)
I think this is a bluff to worry him - but the real target it the LA Times - run the story and the Republicans win!
Why would her camp even mention this - it makes her look bad.
“I’ve got scoop - but we are too pure to use it”
Just them mentioning their is dirt is basically saying Obama has a target on his back.
When in reality she is the one with something to hide!
Of course Hillary is poised to threaten ANYbody within reach of keeping her from getting her “throne”. The Clintonistas mastered the “politics of personal destruction” going back to the Arkansas crime family days.
I don’t think very many people give a flip about Huma. I’m not saying that’s a good thing.
I think Obama peaked too early.
Niccolò Machiavelli-The Prince
8^)
Oh, she has the dirt on Obama.
It’s just that to use it would be to open a can of worms best left closed (for Hillary’s good).
It seems to involve campaign fund contributions back when Obama first ran for senate.
Boy, there’s something that Hillary is sinless on (-gag-), and has a right to throw rocks.
The idea that exposing Huma is some locked-closet secret harmful to Hillary is ..just... exactly....what....she....wants....you....to...think.
See. the MSM has some ‘’’’big’’’’ secret, and they are gonna sit on it. (i.e. SCREW YOU, READERS. We’ll decide what you know, and when)
But..... even though speculation is rampant, and websites like DAILYK.O.S., Drudge, DU, benefit from the activity, no secret is ever revealed.
There will be things, little things, others will reveal, others will find out.
Some will believe in finding the big secret. Some not.
BUT, there never was one.
Obama should counter-attack with all the documented dirt/mud stuck to Hilly for decades. The MSM could not ignore reporting on it. Also, Hilly would have to expend all kind of resources to defend. Another also, she would most likely lose her cool and expose her real character.
The Clintonistas mastered the “politics of personal destruction”
How about using her own weapons against her?
Anybody want to bet where he got the story and who it's about?
Anybody remember last month when skin merchant Larry Flynt said he had a scandal on a top US Senator that would shake up Washington?
Anybody want to bet where he got the story and who it’s about?
I guess I missed this... Are you saying he got some info FROM Hillary or got some info ON Hillary?
Not to mention Clinton supporter Ron Buerkle either is buying or just bought the National Enquirer. They can feed the dirt into the mud machines, stand back and watch it fly. All the while staying just out of the splatter pattern.
I think it went like this...
The LAT is sitting on a story, so whisper the “Washington insiders”. It’s a scandal about a “leading presidential candidate”.
Now supposition...
It’s about Hitlary. She knows about it.
This current “whispering campaign” is planted by her operatives to make everyone THINK that LAT story is about HIM.
Pretty soon everyone’s head will be spinning to the point that she is innoculated.
I believe they call it plausible deniability.
She’ll be able to make up whatever story she wishes.
So far, I haven’t met anyone who’s a Hillary fan.
Most likely the “information” regarding Obama is not sexual or financial but various incidents of contemporary drug use — most likely marijuana. Old Dumbo Ears likes to smoke and its likely not just cigarettes, but good old marijuana (he does tend to have a glazed look at times). For that, we should not fault him: that he does not be a man or a real person and just come out and say it: that we should fault him for as anyone who smokes pot but hides it because of their profession or lot in life.
The Klintoonistas get around in many of Washington’s social circles, including media circles where occasional marijuana use is acceptable. It is likely that Obama may have been either present while marijuana was smoked or smoked it himself: no big, but enough to derail his campaign. One thing you can be sure of: a stone faced witch like Hillary certainly does not have the looseness to smoke pot unlike that lug of a thug party boy husband of hers.
Most important of all: remember, remember, remember, we WANT Hillary to win the Demonrat nomination, so please shut the hell up, Tom DeLazy, because she won’t go on to win the presidency.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=18446
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8T1IPAG0&show_article=1
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/20/475471.aspx?CommentPosted=true#commentmessage
http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2007/11/obama-confesses-drug-use-to-hi.html
This is especially true when they realize that Slick’s transgressions were forgiven. Will look like a lynching “just because he is black” to many loyal black Democrats.
This links with Obama stating he used ‘drugs’ in his youth.
So likely, you are right about HRC trying to hold this over his head.
Hillary’s real achille’s heel is ‘pre-Huma’.
Since when is a lesbian having a terrorist lesbian on the payroll a scandal??
Pray for W and Our Troops
I believe that the reason Obama has reiterated on his “past” drug use is because he knows that the Klinoonistas have let it be known that they might drop the ball on him about contemporary drug use: thus he is trying to — as it’s said in politics — get “out in front” of the issue/leak before and/or if it does occur.
Obama acts like he is running for the veep act more than the lead role. The rest of them outside of special ‘k’, do not even project an interest to win. Would not surprise me these players get their scripts directly from Hillry’s war room. IF Obama were serious about running he could clean Hillry’s clock.... I think this whole thing is posturing.
Me neither. Even young woman who claim to support Hillary say they don't like her.
The few Democrats I know also say they can't stand Hillary.
I was in the US Post office the other day with my "Hillary is Repulsive" t-shirt, and all the women behind the counter said "I love your shirt" -- and then they said THEY WERE DEMOCRATS (and union members to boot).
To me, this spells bad news for Hillary, who is simply getting support from people nastalgic for the Clinton glory years, but really hate the sHrill woman.
So, who is this nasty looking gal with the big nose? I’ve seen this picture before and wondered.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.