Skip to comments.
Rather Files $70 Million Lawsuit Against CBS
New York Times ^
| September 19, 2007
| JACQUES STEINBERG
Posted on 09/19/2007 12:30:52 PM PDT by abb
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-250 last
To: abb
“And right there is the problem with all this: the elevation of the reporter, the presenter, the hack — to use the better British terms — into overexposed, overpaid, undermanaged, self-important personality. And as the Times story notes, the new overpaid, overexposed personality in Rather’s chair isn’t helping the network either. The anchor model is not only broken, it’s dangerous. It produces Dan Rathers.”
Many corporations, in particuliar those controlled by liberals seem to have these pampered Princes and Princesses.
They are overpaid egomaniacs, who hurt the company and destroy the morale of the worker bees around them.
241
posted on
09/20/2007 11:21:23 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(What do you call a ChiCom donor's coffin? (drum roll) A HSU box!)
To: abb
Those were great days.
242
posted on
09/20/2007 11:37:07 AM PDT
by
TNPatriot
(No arsenal ... is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women. -RR)
To: abb
The sharks are eating each other.
243
posted on
09/20/2007 11:49:02 AM PDT
by
Mikey
(Freedom isn't free, but slavery is.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin; IncPen; All
Another bump for IncPen’s classic (seeBS blinking eye, post #193) on a FR classic thread. Thanks to all posters.
What a community of outstanding people!
244
posted on
09/20/2007 5:49:09 PM PDT
by
PGalt
To: PGalt
It IS a classic. I can’t let it die. It continues to give and give and give... :)
245
posted on
09/20/2007 5:52:21 PM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: TNPatriot
LOL!
Hope Rather does not get a penny. Rather must have gotten the idea from Imus and hopes for any kind of settlement.
BTW, what is happening with Imus?
To: abb
DID ANYONE SEE THAT RAT BASTARD ON LARRY KING LAST NIGHT????
HE ACTUALLY HAD THE *NERVE* TO SAY SOMETHING LIKE “NOTICE I ONLY REFER TO THE DOCUMENTS AS BEING FALSE - I DID NOT COMMENT ON THE STORY ITSELF- WHICH WAS TRUE”
IN OTHER WORDS HE WAS STICKING TO “FAKE BUT ACCURATE”
247
posted on
09/21/2007 6:20:44 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
To: GalaxieFiveHundred
HA! HA! HA! LOL!
248
posted on
09/22/2007 3:33:17 PM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(just b/c your paranoid, doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you....Run, Fred, Run. :^)
To: Greg F
...And his reputation for truthfulness and reliability would give an aspirin a headache. But I’d still like to beat Dan Rather like a rented mule for trying to destroy a sitting President of the United States with forged documents... Absolutely priceless.
249
posted on
09/22/2007 10:21:40 PM PDT
by
T Lady
(The Mainstream Media: Public Enemy #1)
To: TNPatriot
ROTFLMBO!
...There are tears streaming down my cheeks as I look at your post :-).
250
posted on
09/22/2007 10:30:27 PM PDT
by
T Lady
(The Mainstream Media: Public Enemy #1)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-250 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson