Posted on 09/12/2007 7:45:05 AM PDT by SuzyQ2
Jay Rockefeller Warned Syria of Iraq War Intentions)
IOW, the Bush Administration did not plan on having a traitor give our war plans to the enemy. Jay Rockefeller went to Syria in January and Saddam started moving the WMDs immediately afterwards, according to all reports that say the WMD was moved in the three months preceding our invasion.
recollection:
twelve years of negotiating in the UN
many UN resolutions flaunted by Iraq during that time
failure to abide by surrender conditions after Desert Storm
firing on American and British aircraft in the protected zone
denial of Un inspectors searching for nuclear bomb components
and more - (aged memory beginning to fade)
where is the lie?
So by your theory Saddam was not involved in WMD nor was he involved in sponsoring terrorism.
You sincerely don’t believe that, do you?
Saddam was up to his eyes in sponsoring terrorists. If you want to say that didn’t include Bin Laden, then have at it.
And Saddam was not about to give up his WMDs. From his perspective they were a source of power he could use against the US.
Chew on this: We couldn’t find Saddam’s Scud rockets during the Gulf War. Thousands of eyes on the ground, in the air and around the world looking for these things and yet he was able to keep them safe and kept firing them. Did we ever find them? If not, I suppose that means he never had them or got rid of them, right?
Because with the libs, they will use a lie even when the truth would better serve them. It;s in their nature. Juat look at the Klintoons!
FReeper documentary : Saddam’s WMDs MUST SEE
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1882083/posts
Yes. And the democrat a$$holes wanted to keep doing it forever. Iraq had 12 freakin' years to show they disarmed. How long did the democrats think was reasonable? 30 years? Then you hear about how we should have allowed "sanctions to work" but then the democrats complained that it was "hurting the Iraqi people". No mention of Oil for Palaces of course.
(((I thought we went to war with Al-Qaeda and any terrorists who directly threatened us. ... Of course, the falsehood that Iraq was directly connected to the 9/11 attacks )))
Wrong and misleading. No one said anything about a “direct” link except you and your Demmasters. A “link”, showing rats involved in something together, is good enough for me.
Ray Robinson tells the story best.
I believe there is a connection still.
February 20, 2006
Saddam and al-Qaeda
http://www.americanthinker.com/2006/02/saddam_and_alqaeda.html
October 14, 2006
Fallujah: Baathist and Wahhabist cooperation
http://www.americanthinker.com/2006/10/fallujah_baathist_and_wahhabis.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.