Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach

You are such an idiot.


691 posted on 04/21/2007 9:31:17 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 610 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson

Pure class all the way, Jim. So nice of you to say. /s


702 posted on 04/21/2007 9:33:39 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
You are such an idiot.

What is that kind of talk? Are you drunk?

704 posted on 04/21/2007 9:34:01 PM PDT by CheneyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Whoa, whoa no name calling!


713 posted on 04/21/2007 9:35:41 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek (President Fred Thompson will finally give the University of Memphis the respect that it is due!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

You cannot be the Jim Robinson I came to respect all these years. Not possible.


714 posted on 04/21/2007 9:36:13 PM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
You are such an idiot.

Jim, you're better than this.

715 posted on 04/21/2007 9:36:37 PM PDT by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
Source for the following post

To: Peach
So I’ll stop responding to your posts now, since I can’t make sense of them.

For the record, I asked you two very clear questions which you refuse to answer:

"Are you telling us that if a candidate who opposed abortion was nominated by Republicans, you would vote in opposition in the general election? Are you of the opinion that opposing abortion renders a candidate "unelectable"? (Hint: of the last four presidents elected, three opposed abortion)"

Such questions are hardly impenetrable. Please answer them.

The reason I asked them is equally simple. You employ tactics in support of Rudy Giuliani nearly identical to those FairOpinion employed in support of Arnold Schwarzenegger. You have seen where that leads, and to be banned here would harm your effectiveness in supporting Rudy far more than it would harm FreeRepublic, I promise you. Thus, you dance around my questions like a coward.

You see, this dichotomy, between moderate and conservative has existed since the day moderate Republicans betrayed the party nominee in 1964. Moderates have refused to support conservative candidates as "unelectable" ever since, demanding we support their policy preferences while they refuse to incorporate ours. Exposure of that failure to reciprocate threatens them, just as it does you simply because conservatives may respond by staying home if a moderate is nominated in response to like treatment. I promise you, if Rudy Giuliani is nominated on the false pretenses he portrays today, the MSM will so loudly blandish his history that, considering the history of the GOP betraying conservative candidates, there will be no chance he would ever be elected.

I don't want to see that event. Should you portray a conservative as "unelectable" I will demand the criteria by which you support that assertion. Opposition to abortion is clearly a distinction that matters to you.

Please answer the questions.

191 posted on 04/21/2007 8:14:28 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)

To: Carry_Okie

Take a hike. I’m not here to answer your questions.

192 posted on 04/21/2007 8:19:07 PM PDT by Peach


746 posted on 04/21/2007 9:45:31 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
To: Peach

You are such an idiot.


Priceless.
1,392 posted on 04/22/2007 12:25:51 AM PDT by dukakis kerry the dream team
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson