Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sanctions On Iran Approved By U.N.
WP ^ | Dec. 24, 2006 | Colum Lynch

Posted on 12/27/2006 6:02:39 AM PST by Schnucki

UNITED NATIONS, Dec. 23 -- The U.N. Security Council voted unanimously Saturday to restrict Iran's trade in sensitive nuclear materials and to freeze the assets of 22 Iranian officials and institutions linked to the country's most controversial nuclear programs.

The council's action culminated more than three years of diplomatic efforts by the United States to have Iran sanctioned for expanding its enrichment of uranium. But Russia, a close commercial partner of Iran, stripped the resolution of some of its toughest measures, including a travel ban on officials linked to the nuclear programs.

The resolution demands that Iran immediately suspend its enrichment program and its reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel within 60 days or face additional U.N. penalties. It calls on Tehran to begin talks with the Security Council's five permanent powers and Germany to allay international suspicions that it may be pursuing nuclear weapons.

Although some critics suggested that the council resolution was too weak to compel Iran to change its behavior, the Bush administration, which favored tougher measures, said it was still pleased with the final version, saying it increases Iran's international isolation. Some U.S. officials said suppliers have already cut off Iran from shipments of sensitive nuclear equipment, partly as a result of U.S. pressure.

U.S. Undersecretary of State R. Nicholas Burns called the vote "humiliating" for Iran.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: iran; iraniansanctions; nuclear; nucleariran
Strongest Measures Stripped From Final Resolution
1 posted on 12/27/2006 6:02:40 AM PST by Schnucki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

Civilization for Dummies bump.


2 posted on 12/27/2006 6:10:10 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki
U.S. Undersecretary of State R. Nicholas Burns called the vote "humiliating" for Iran.

Can anyone explain to me WHY Burns, who was a foreign policy advisor to John F'in Kerry in the 2004 campaign is serving in an allegedly REPUBLICAN Administration?
3 posted on 12/27/2006 6:15:58 AM PST by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

I'm sure they will be as strong as the sanctions were for Iraq! The UN is the enemy of the US. They need to find a new home in Iran or Venezuela.


4 posted on 12/27/2006 6:26:18 AM PST by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRES. 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
"Can anyone explain to me WHY Burns, who was a foreign policy advisor to John F'in Kerry in the 2004 campaign is serving in an allegedly REPUBLICAN Administration?"

Because Bush's final transformation from "compassionate conservative" to full blown "socialist tool" is complete. In reality there didn't seem to be much difference between the two to begin with.
5 posted on 12/27/2006 6:46:47 AM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: monday

I was afraid someone was going to say that.


6 posted on 12/27/2006 6:22:41 PM PST by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson