Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Briefing: NASA Images Suggest Water Still Flows in Brief Spurts on Mars
NASA ^ | 6 December 2006

Posted on 12/06/2006 10:46:00 AM PST by bd476

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: neodad

41 posted on 12/06/2006 11:44:48 AM PST by smonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bd476

Whatever the number, it is a tiny fraction of what it should be. However, it should be private industry going into and developing space.


42 posted on 12/06/2006 11:46:13 AM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

Ever read Blake?


43 posted on 12/06/2006 11:48:06 AM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer
Why does it appear to be a distributary on a downhill slope? " It doesn't appear to reach a flat area - atleast not from a monoscopic view of the image. Please - I am only speculating here - I hope you understand.

I certainly understand, skepticism is good. :-)

The pictures accompanying this article don't do justice to the structure of the flow. See the picture below for a better rendition.


44 posted on 12/06/2006 11:49:28 AM PST by Unmarked Package
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Unmarked Package
Thanks.

That image really changes the perspective, doesn't it?. The flow does appear to reach the plain below. This would explain the ditributary.

Also - I noticed in the other image that there are some examples of a normal dendritic drainage pattern on the downslope. Do you see them?

Thanks.

45 posted on 12/06/2006 11:55:06 AM PST by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: bd476; Young Werther
Related thread: From Young Werther.
46 posted on 12/06/2006 11:55:33 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( Vote other in the poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

Good one!


47 posted on 12/06/2006 11:56:25 AM PST by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bd476; KevinDavis

ping.


48 posted on 12/06/2006 11:58:03 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( Vote other in the poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer
Being overwhelmed by facts and opinions of professionals, it is good to resign one's fallacious position and learn from the experience.

Congratulations, you are the first on FR to ever concede thus.

49 posted on 12/06/2006 11:59:19 AM PST by Defiant (Obama as President would make us an Obama Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: bd476

Wonder what is the temperature on the surface that water flows and doesn't freeze? ????


50 posted on 12/06/2006 12:00:07 PM PST by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer
obviously the "we never saw that kind of color change" argument cannot be proof of anything (like water), it can only discredit other phenomenon
IMHO:
as for the distributary structure of the flow, that is interesting. However, it may be noteworthy that the flow is not on a surface with established drainages-- the area where the flow is appears to be a talus slope that has accumulated from countless small slides-- which could create a largely homogeneous surface shape devoid of any major topological low areas that would confine the flow within themselves. On earth these low areas are usually present from the consistent long-term action erosion (especially by water) which Mars lacks. The question is whether the local topology of that part of the talus slope contains enough vertical variation that the flow should be contained to a single channel; without regular water flow I see no reason that it should. Also, the flow appears to come from a single point, making a tributary form impossible (for lack of anything for the flow to contribute to or have contributed to it). Finally, may I suggest that if one were to take a signifcant quantity of water, say, a bucketful,and quickly dump it on a pile of dirt the water will will spread out in a distributary fashion with many rivulets. Only after there has been enough water consistently flowing (like having a garden hose issuing water onto the pile) can the flow establish a channel via erosion and contain itself within it (a more tributary from).

/shameless speculation
51 posted on 12/06/2006 12:00:16 PM PST by verum ago (The Iranian Space Agency: set phasers to jihad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Unmarked Package
The image to which I refer:

52 posted on 12/06/2006 12:00:23 PM PST by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Unmarked Package
Whoa!

LOL, sorry but this is very exciting. :-)

Thank you for posting the close-up.

53 posted on 12/06/2006 12:01:28 PM PST by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer

A few years ago, when they were seeing trees and subway systems on Mars, there were images of what could have been lava tubes that had become exposed by weathering. To me they looked like ice, not tubes but solid like ropes going here and there under the surface. Just plain ice formed under very low atmospheric pressure.


54 posted on 12/06/2006 12:03:54 PM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook; Unmarked Package; BurbankKarl; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Global2010; Brad's Gramma; ...
ex-snook wrote: "Wonder what is the temperature on the surface that water flows and doesn't freeze? ????"

From the NASA News conference, what I believe they said was that water on Mars percolates up then freezes at night, then melts in the Mars daylight.

55 posted on 12/06/2006 12:06:20 PM PST by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer; Unmarked Package
hmmm that is an interesting picture

kinsman: re post # 38: yikes! stay with it-- disagreement, discussion, and skepticism all should promote thought and hopefully bring both sides of the argument closer to the truth. Like you I'm not pretending to actually know what's going on over on some planet millions of miles away, but the least we can do is speculate and criticise each other's arguments in order to enhance both our understandings of the subject.
56 posted on 12/06/2006 12:11:27 PM PST by verum ago (The Iranian Space Agency: set phasers to jihad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

Victoria Crater



Victoria Crater

This stereo view of Mars' Victoria Crater combines two of the three images taken by the High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. A red-colored image was acquired with the orbiter pointed 3.84 degrees to the west and a blue-colored one with the orbiter pointed 16.2 degrees to the west.

For a 3-D view of the topography, view this image through glasses with a red filter for your left eye, and a blue or blue-green filter for your right eye. The difference in viewing angle between the two images is about 12 degrees, which is greater than the convergence angle between the left and right eyes of humans while viewing distant objects, so the vertical relief appears much steeper than is actually the case. While some of the cliffs around the crater are in fact vertical, the slopes below the cliffs are no steeper than 30 degrees.

Images from the High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment and additional information about the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter are available online at: http://www.nasa.gov/mro.

Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona

Victoria Crater

57 posted on 12/06/2006 12:20:10 PM PST by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: verum ago
speculate and criticise

I, too, am here for that to a degree, but more because the MSM or some NASA spokesman or Lib Prof somewhere will eventually get around to saying something outrageous about what NASA should do and I hope that can be caught and destroyed before it gets embedded in some totally ill-advised national policy or gets taught in the public school system.

58 posted on 12/06/2006 12:24:54 PM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I, too, am here for that to a degree, but more because the MSM or some NASA spokesman or Lib Prof somewhere will eventually get around to saying something outrageous about what NASA should do and I hope that can be caught and destroyed before it gets embedded in some totally ill-advised national policy or gets taught in the public school system.

that too, of course. (This is an overall political forum, afterall.)

Viva FreeRepublic!
59 posted on 12/06/2006 12:30:11 PM PST by verum ago (The Iranian Space Agency: set phasers to jihad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I hope that can be caught and destroyed before it gets embedded in some totally ill-advised national policy or gets taught in the public school system.

One thing I've been confused deeply by on FR is exactly whether people are somehow fearful or feel disdain to the idea of life on other planets and how that ties into creationism.

60 posted on 12/06/2006 12:30:16 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson