Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dick Morris: 20 years of Democratic Control
Fox News | 11/9/06

Posted on 11/09/2006 5:25:38 AM PST by pabianice

Dick Morris just on Fox: he said this is the beginning of an historic swing to the Dems. The next two years will be an unending blizzard of hearings and subpoenas and trials which, with the help of a drooling leftist media, will blanket the country, destroying the Republican Party and ensuring that dems control Congress and the White House for the foreseeable future.

Standard Morris stuff. Didn't he predict that the Repubs would keep Congress? I think it more likely that the Dems will take-off their masks and give the country a horror show for the next two years, something the elctorate doesn't want. We'll see.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dickisadick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-166 next last
To: pabianice
Look, we did some really dumb things.

1. Does anyone remember any of the congressmen or senators coming out to defend Bush or the War?

2. Denny Hasert, though a good human being, is just about the dullest person in the world. NOBODY, even the activists, knew what he or the republicans stood for other then, apparently from all we heard, pedophilia.

3. Both the House and Senate was content to stand aside and allow Bush and US to define republican programs.

5. Why were they so publically against the president and you got the distinct impression, when you did manage to see a republican, that they were democrats. Had to be because they claimed everything Bush did was wrong.

Sorry folks, these people were a bunch of wimpy weak sisters and we deserved to lose.

61 posted on 11/09/2006 6:02:35 AM PST by McGavin999 (Republicans take out our trash, Democrats re-elect theirs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

It is unfortunately accurate to predict an horrendous internal attack on our country within a year by terrorist forces that the Democrats don't think exist.


62 posted on 11/09/2006 6:03:03 AM PST by hgro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

The most radical left leadership in this nations's history and American's will quickly see the mistake they made. Senate looks bad though for the foreseeable future


63 posted on 11/09/2006 6:03:46 AM PST by ground_fog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Puppage; Congressman Billybob
Yes, he did say that, and it turned out he was right as rain. He's also going to be right on this prediction if El Presidente Jorge Arbusto gets his way with his amnesty idea.

Now that I think of it, you don't think that Arbusto (I think I might start calling him that, let's wait and see...) would have secretly wanted it to turn out this way so he could have his way with amnesty for his illegal buddies, do you?

Nah... No President would ever be so duplicitous and treacherous...

64 posted on 11/09/2006 6:04:28 AM PST by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty

>Check this out<

Posted on FR at
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1735501/posts?page=6


65 posted on 11/09/2006 6:06:54 AM PST by Darnright (I think Iraq is the most serious and imminent threat to our country. Sen John Edwards, 2/24/02)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Grendel9

--And I still don't believe it was the
Iraq war that kept Republicans home;
IMO it was the Bush stand on Immigration
and the House/Senate refusing to
work up the Sensenbrenner House Bill. --

Actually Republican turnout was pretty strong, maybe a hair stronger the Dem turnout. Problem was the independents turned out and tilted dem. Iraq was a real bummer for the indies; so was the Foley scandal.


66 posted on 11/09/2006 6:07:37 AM PST by ruffedgrouse (Think outside the box, dammit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

20 years or 2 years?


67 posted on 11/09/2006 6:08:18 AM PST by cgk (I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

The more Morris talks, the more I am convinced that is "falling out" with the Clintonistas has been a ruse all along and that he is simply doing their bidding.


68 posted on 11/09/2006 6:08:57 AM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hgro

--It is unfortunately accurate to predict an horrendous internal attack on our country within a year by terrorist forces that the Democrats don't think exist.--

Sometimes a stubborn, clueless mule needs a good rap on the head with a 2 X 4 before it figures out where to go.


69 posted on 11/09/2006 6:08:57 AM PST by ruffedgrouse (Think outside the box, dammit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: patriot preacher

I think that's the RAT plan. The question is whether it will be successful or not.


70 posted on 11/09/2006 6:09:16 AM PST by gogeo (Irony is not one of Islam's core competencies (thx Pharmboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Morris is a toe sucker.


71 posted on 11/09/2006 6:09:32 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

My concern is that the Democrats are not going to overreach. I know it is not in their DNA, but if they behave responsibly for the next two years, we do not get either chamber back in 2008.

I heard Chuckie Schumer last night say that he was not in favor of raising the top marginal tax rates. This is both good news and bad news. But I think it gives us a clue where they might be heading. Even the Dems will have learned from the Republican stupidity of the last 12 years.


72 posted on 11/09/2006 6:10:54 AM PST by Oldhunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

The toe sucker would have predicted in 1938 that Neville Chamberlain's socialists would be in power for at least a decade. The Dems will be consumed with Bush hate and while they are holding hearing to impeach Bush, the Islamic Fascists will be planning and executing another 9-11 type attack. That will quickly change the voting.


73 posted on 11/09/2006 6:11:01 AM PST by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Just one little caveat, Dick...

You forgot to factor in God.

HIS plans suspersede your wishful thinking.

74 posted on 11/09/2006 6:11:08 AM PST by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty
Actually, it's not at all laughable, my FRiend. On this score (at least) Dick Morris is essentially correct. My only quibble would be with the "20-year" attribute - I don't think it will take quite that long - but it will take some time - certainly not two years, or even four for the Republicans to recover their standing with the electorate.

Much damage has been done to the Republican Party, and there is much time in the wilderness ahead, so I would suggest getting used to the idea of being a minority for a while. As an index of what has occurred, Independent voters did not fail to turn up on Tuesday - they did turn out, and in significant numbers, and voted overwhelmingly for Democrats (the figure I saw was over 60%). This is a sea change from recent voting patterns and it is indicative of a major shift in public attitude toward the Republican Party.

In brief, the Republicans came to power gradually beginning in 1980, failing briefly in '92, and then overwhelmingly in 1994. That was 12 years ago, the past three or four of which have been a Republican exercise in intellectual laziness, fiscal profligacy, ethical decay, disorganization, and lack of discipline. It doesn't matter a whit if a party is "right" on the merits of key issues: once power has wreaked its corrupting influence, the voters will take notice and act accordingly.

That is what happened on Tuesday. The Iraq war was a factor, but only because the Republican Party, having lost its formerly high standing with the electorate, lacked the ability to successfully make a case for it. The Republican Party is now widely viewed as the party of Big Government and waste, a development that would have Ronald Reagan shaking his head in sadness.

Do not kid yourselves, people - this will take a long time. 8-12 years would be my guess. The Republican Party needs a complete overhaul of its leadership and a reinvigoration of it grassroots operations. The process must begin with a restatement of core principles and ideas - Conservative principles and ideas - chief among them: limited Federal government, strong national defense, low taxes, the primacy and sanctity of human life, and secure national borders.

It's time to start.

75 posted on 11/09/2006 6:11:51 AM PST by andy58-in-nh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
What make politics so interesting is that it truly is the realm of the unexpected. Remember in '92 the Dems had control of all three branches? Two years later they got wiped out.

Another terrorist attack, Osama is captured, Iraq turns out well, war with Iran {Israel proxy?}, revolution in Mexico....

Expect the unexpected and the unforeseen changes that will ensue.
76 posted on 11/09/2006 6:15:06 AM PST by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I think Pat Cadell has a better track record of predicting these things. He said the democrats would win this time around but prove to be so insane that they would lose it in the next election.

I think there's a lot of truth to this. The Dems are likely to pile on a lot of stuff in the next two years. Maybe not a whole lot of domestic stuff, but most likely an unending round of "investigations" and indictments, which will thoroughly disgust a whole lot of people. Heck, many people who didn't particularly care for Clinton were disgusted with his whole impeachment business, even though it actually had substance. Plus, we WILL be attacked at home sometime within the next two years. I doubt that even the Mexicans will stand for that.

The Dems have an awful lot to accomplish within the next two years, and much of their success will hinge on factors that are really outside their control.

77 posted on 11/09/2006 6:15:06 AM PST by MissNomer (If by "working through" the problem you mean "giving up" . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

If the next 2 years is nothing but an unending blizzard of hearings and subpoenas, the American public will tire of the Democrats.


78 posted on 11/09/2006 6:15:17 AM PST by Juana la Loca (Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuma)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldhunk

The urge to stay in power is very strong for politicians of any party, and if the Dems decide to "bone" their base for a while by acting moderate, they'll do it enthusiastically if it gets them through the next election cycle. Don't forget, the current "god" of the Democrat party kept homosexuals out of the military (don't ask don't tell) and stiffed urban voters by getting rid of AFDC, so that he'd be more electable in 1996. Lessons like this are not soon forgotten.


79 posted on 11/09/2006 6:15:26 AM PST by ruffedgrouse (Think outside the box, dammit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Impeach the Boy

Over the weekend prior to the election, he went back and forth....we're gonna win both, or lose both, or lose one and keep one....man, my head was spinning!


80 posted on 11/09/2006 6:16:09 AM PST by IrishRainy (The only way BJ Clinton would have nailed bin Laden is if Ossama had been a White House intern.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson