To: Sola Veritas
Well it can't be that we "didn't find anything" because that's old news. So, I suspect it is either: (1) An article about how the Bush administration allegedly covered up information that Iraq didn't have a program. or (2) An article about new revelations that Iraq was closer than previously reported.
It's got to be something along the lines of (1) -- Bush knew they didn't have nukes but left the threat of nukes in as one of the reasons for invading. But it does seem old news.
posted on 11/02/2006 5:11:07 PM PST
(Vietnam Vet, USN Coastal Div. 13, Cat Lo, USCG patrol boat, 1968: Didn't see Kerry's sorry ass.)
whatever it is, it has to be a lie. that's why they waited until now to print it, not enough time to debunk it, but in just enough time to get all over the news.
posted on 11/02/2006 5:15:06 PM PST
I think it is two different stories..
NYT PLANS EXCLUSIVE STORY ON IRAQ AND RESEARCH OF NUKE BOMB
posted on 11/02/2006 5:16:35 PM PST
It's got to be something along the lines of (1) -- Bush knew they didn't have nukes but left the threat of nukes in as one of the reasons for invading
Just one problem .. Bush never said they had nukes
posted on 11/02/2006 5:16:47 PM PST
(Senator Kerry's response to the military ~ Let me make this is crystal clear, I apologize to no one)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson