Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT Plans Exclusive Story on Iraq and Research of Nuke Bomb
the drudge report ^ | 11/2/06 | matt drudge

Posted on 11/02/2006 4:55:43 PM PST by letsgonova19087

NYT PLANS EXCLUSIVE STORY ON IRAQ AND RESEARCH OF NUKE BOMB... NEWSROOM SOURCE TELLS DRUDGE: 'IT WILL LEAD THE PAPER ON FRIDAY... IT SHOULD IGNITE NEWS CYCLES'... DEVELOPING...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birdcageliner; lies; lyingliars; propaganda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 401-412 next last
To: section9
I agree, I don't really believe it's Iran they are truly worried about because Iran has been developing a nuke way before the website but maybe someone like Hamas?
341 posted on 11/02/2006 7:46:51 PM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

I ask again. The NYT has the nerve to question others about releasing sensitive information?

This is almost a political gift to come right back to the wiretap disclosure!


342 posted on 11/02/2006 7:47:22 PM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
hell, the leftist media has the sheeple believing that iraq didn't even have a can of Raid in the entire country before the war - much less WMD and nukes.

No- just the opposite. The media has tried to get people to believe that the thousands of drums of precursor chemicals found throughout Iraq and in its military bases was just roach spray.

343 posted on 11/02/2006 7:48:22 PM PST by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: mware

bttt


344 posted on 11/02/2006 7:48:34 PM PST by petercooper (Polls Schmolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
"They hope we won't notice and comment,,,What plans? What bomb?

Here's hoping the fence sitters have some smarts, but that seems a little optimistic at this point.

And the Dem partisans will crow, despite all our mocking at the contradiction.

There's such little time left now, they make a big splash, and hope for no clear analysis.

345 posted on 11/02/2006 7:48:51 PM PST by dangerfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/03/world/middleeast/03documents.html?ei=5094&en=1511d6b3da302d4f&hp=&ex=1162530000&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print


346 posted on 11/02/2006 7:51:38 PM PST by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

Check out this dig:

"Some intelligence officials feared that individual documents, translated and interpreted by amateurs, would be used out of context to second-guess the intelligence agencies’ view that Mr. Hussein did not have unconventional weapons or substantive ties to Al Qaeda. Reviewing the documents for release would add an unnecessary burden on busy intelligence analysts, they argued."


347 posted on 11/02/2006 7:52:52 PM PST by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: letsgonova19087

Just getting home. Did the NYTs print a story saying that Saddam was close to building a nuke in 2002?


348 posted on 11/02/2006 7:54:54 PM PST by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa
I think the sporkweasels just stuned you with their hugh beeberlike devices.

Yea ...I keep seeing neo-cons everywhere

349 posted on 11/02/2006 7:54:55 PM PST by woofie (If not this war then which one?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: All
"The documents, roughly a dozen in number, contain charts, diagrams, equations and lengthy narratives about bomb building that nuclear experts who have viewed them say go beyond what is available on the Internet and in other public forums. For instance, the papers give detailed information on how to build nuclear firing circuits and triggering explosives, as well as the radioactive cores of atom bombs.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/03/world/middleeast/03documents.html?ei=5094&en=1511d6b3da302d4f&hp=&ex=1162530000&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print

Again, I personally read this kind of information years ago in a publication telling how to make a bomb. Big Deal. Let's see you make one now.
350 posted on 11/02/2006 7:55:04 PM PST by gb63
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: dangerfield

yep, it will take a week or so. You see they will scream "GWB is incompetent, incompetent, dumb"

and people will hear that and not wonder about what else is in those untranslated docs. I do believe that no matter what they say, everyone knows Hussein was going for the big one, and had chem and bio weapons.

Amazing story,,the times shot itself in the foot before they tried to shoot GWB


351 posted on 11/02/2006 7:55:32 PM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi

"before the 1991 Persian Gulf war"

If it was before the 1991 Persian Gulf War then the IAEA didn't do their jobs for at least 7 years and destroy the information. The docs that have been translated go up to 2003 from what I've seen.


352 posted on 11/02/2006 7:55:54 PM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: dangerfield

I believe it's preemptory desperation by the liberals. They fear an Osama tape about to surface and the Saddam death sentence about to be handed down.


353 posted on 11/02/2006 7:55:54 PM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

"The precise review process that led to the posting of the nuclear and chemical-weapons documents is unclear. But in testimony before Congress last spring, a senior official from Mr. Negroponte’s office, Daniel Butler, described a “triage” system used to sort out material that should remain classified. Even so, he said, the policy was to “be biased towards release if at all possible.“ Government officials say all the documents in Arabic have received at least a quick review by Arabic linguists.

Some of the first posted documents dealt with Iraq’s program to make germ weapons, followed by a wave of papers on chemical arms."


354 posted on 11/02/2006 7:56:08 PM PST by ikez78 (www.regimeofterror.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: gb63

60 year old technology.

the issue for all the nuclear wanna-be states - is their ability to grow and enrich the material needed to make the cores. and they have to build infrastructure to do that - reactors, centrifuges, etc. the firing circuit and triggering mechanism, is the least of their concerns.


355 posted on 11/02/2006 7:57:57 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: gb63

The point is that Saddam wasn't supposed to have this know how and it was up to the IAEA to assure he didn't.


356 posted on 11/02/2006 7:58:24 PM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

"You think those two dweebs would be out so close to the election.."

One would think that, however, they have hand-picked a lot of seemingly 'conservative' Dims to try to take seats away from Pubbies. If they come out and and open their mouths, let alone try to verablize the little platform they have, they'll lose all those seats. Looks like their stragery is to let Rock Star Obama and a couple of others campaign - they made a bad choice when they picked jon carry for that. All the so-called 'leaders' in the Dim party have been noticeably absent - Turbin Durban, Leaky Leahy, Plugs Biden, Botox Babs, Stretch Pelosi, Dingy Harry, etc.


357 posted on 11/02/2006 7:59:05 PM PST by Seattle Conservative (God Bless and protect our troops and their CIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
The point has been made better than me by other posters: building Little Boy and Fat Man variants has been out in the wild now for at least 20 years (there's also a third way, Thin Man, which was an early design to use Plutonium in a gun-bomb design that was some 19 ft. long. Oppenheimer dropped it as impractical and concentrated on implosion....). The problem isn't the bomb; it's enriching the Uranium and extracting the Plutonium. Not every President-For-Life can just up and do this on a whim....

Be Seeing You,

Chris

358 posted on 11/02/2006 7:59:54 PM PST by section9 (Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "Jesus is Coming. Everybody look busy...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
Link

The link is to Wikipedia's article on this government website and the program.

359 posted on 11/02/2006 7:59:58 PM PST by elhombrelibre (Global Warming Fears will do for the world what over population fears did for Europe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill; All

and the IAEA failed big time....


360 posted on 11/02/2006 8:00:32 PM PST by KevinDavis (Nancy you ignorant Slut!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 401-412 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson