Posted on 11/02/2006 4:55:43 PM PST by letsgonova19087
NYT PLANS EXCLUSIVE STORY ON IRAQ AND RESEARCH OF NUKE BOMB... NEWSROOM SOURCE TELLS DRUDGE: 'IT WILL LEAD THE PAPER ON FRIDAY... IT SHOULD IGNITE NEWS CYCLES'... DEVELOPING...
It means there's only a few more days until the election...
No idea, but judging from the source it's most likely anti-Bush and involves a leak.
Posting in all caps makes people run about, jump down and up... you know...
ping!
NYT, ENEMY TRASH RAG....Not to be trusted....the slimes have something up it's sleeve....and it is not for the betterment of America....what smoke cover are they going to billow up....for our enemies....this time?
Some rehash of the Congressional report treated a year later as a "revelation" but was merely overlooked in a "Bush Lied" psychosis.
Just a guess.
i bet someone gave them some 'leaked' paper saying that we knew there was NO WMD BEFORE we went in...there is no way on esrth the times would run a story that backed Bush in any way, shape or form!
Well it can't be that we "didn't find anything" because that's old news. So, I suspect it is either:
(1) An article about how the Bush administration allegedly covered up information that Iraq didn't have a program.
or
(2) An article about new revelations that Iraq was closer than previously reported.
Let me be the first to say, that considering it is the Slimes, this must have to do with the "evil doings" of the US "puppet regime" now, not of Saddam before the war.
I hope not...that would make me sick to my stomach if they come out with a "November Surprise"...unless, of course, its some kind of revelation that Saddam was months away from a nuke when we took him out or something...I would be okay with that...
so, did they spell Iran wrong ?
There is no way on earth the Times would publish anything remotely pro-Bush on the Friday before the election.
Hey, don't you know its about how Saddam and Quadaffi were working jointly on a PAN ARAB A bomb to blackmail the world to do whatever they wanted???
HEY IT COULD HAPPEN?
Remember Quadaffi gave up his stuff after 911...and I do believe Iraq nuke scientists were in Libya working on some sort of project.
If it turned out Saddam was close to testing a nuke the Times would never report this before the election. It would support Bush's decision to invade.
What it means is Drudge is shilling for the NYTs again.
Sounds pro-Bush to me. Where's that Patton graphic?
i agree. this is going to be another hit piece.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.