Posted on 10/30/2006 9:29:28 AM PST by presidio9
It's a Brazilian project to protect rain forests.
It's called 'Prince Charles: Saviour of the world'.
There's supposed to be a lifesize one in Brazil.
It's real weird looking. I'm looking for a better pic.
What an idiot! (Charles, not you.)
The Queen is eighty, her son is fifty-seven. Even if she lives to be 100, he would still be "young enough" to become king at seventy-seven. An age restriction has never been put into force in the past.
She was Lady Diana Spencer.
Camilla does look like both of them. rofl. I really hope Charles never makes king. Theres nothing I like about him. I think he is a wackadoddle. The sons seem like nice guys.
Weird? I should say so! There's something "luciferian" about it.
You are quite wrong about the Anglican Church! It is an Orthodox Christian Church that believes in the Divinity of Christ and that the Bible is the inspired Word of God.
The Anglican Church in America will soon replace the ultra-Leftist, heretical Episcopal Church as the Anglican Communion's American entity.
It was most certainly not an hereditary title but Elizabeth I acted as though it were while maintaining her major hobby of causing Roman Catholics to be hanged, drawn and quartered before being disemboweled for saying Mass in Great Britain. Just another case of grand theft ecclesiastical.
Excuse me, but I myself am quite thankful for one particular dalliance between William the Conqueror's father and mother.
Egads, are you serious? I thought it was some sort of satanic winged creature.
I am a member of APCK, an Orthodox Anglican Church in America. I understand that the ACA is another Orthodox Anglican Church in America. Ours are not the only two Orthodox Anglican Churches in America.
I was referring to the Church of England, not to any of the Continuing Churches in America. I should note that there is a remnant FIF (Forward in Faith) movement in the CoE, which is also very Orthodox and Anglican. I do not think the doctrine of this small group is representative of the general doctrinal position of the CoE however, which is the state of affairs to which I was referring.
Sorry for the confusion.
Why? Because you think we have inherited a better system than we would have had if there had been no Norman Conquest of England, or because you can trace your lineage to William the Conqueror?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.