Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army dismisses gay soldier 'outed' by e-mail
AP ^ | 7/27/6 | DUNCAN MANSFIELD

Posted on 07/27/2006 7:39:00 AM PDT by SmithL

JOHNSON CITY, Tenn. (AP) - A decorated sergeant and Arabic language specialist was dismissed from the U.S. Army under the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, though he says he never admitted being gay and his accuser was never identified.

Bleu Copas, 30, told The Associated Press he is gay, but said he was "outed" by a stream of anonymous e-mails to his superiors in the 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Bragg, N.C.

"I knew the policy going in," Copas said in an interview on the campus of East Tennessee State University, where he is pursuing a master's degree in counseling and working as a student adviser. "I knew it was going to be difficult."

An eight-month Army investigation culminated in Copas' honorable discharge on Jan. 30 _ less than four years after he enlisted, he said, out of a post-Sept. 11 sense of duty to his country.

Copas now carries the discharge papers, which mention his awards and citations, so he can document his military service for prospective employers. But the papers also give the reason for his dismissal.

He plans to appeal to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.

The "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, established in 1993, prohibits the military from inquiring about the sex lives of service members, but requires discharges of those who openly acknowledge being gay.

The policy is becoming "a very effective weapon of vengeance in the armed forces" said Steve Ralls, a spokesman for the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, a Washington-based watchdog organization that counseled Copas and is working to repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."

Copas said he was never open about his sexuality in the military and suspects his accuser was someone he mistakenly befriended and apparently slighted.

More than 11,000 service members have been dismissed under the policy, including 726 last year _ an 11 percent jump from 2004 and the first increase since 2001.

That's less than a half-percent of the more than 2 million soldiers, sailors and Marines dismissed for all reasons since 1993, according to the General Accountability Office.

But the GAO also noted that nearly 800 dismissed gay or lesbian service members had critical abilities, including 300 with important language skills. Fifty-five were proficient in Arabic, including Copas, a graduate of the Defense Language Institute in California.

Discharging and replacing them has cost the Pentagon nearly $369 million, according to the Center for the Study of Sexual Minorities in the Military at the University of California, Santa Barbara.

Lt. Col. James Zellmer, Copas' commanding officer in the 313th military intelligence battalion, told the AP that "the evidence clearly indicated that Sgt. Copas had engaged in homosexual acts."

While investigators were never able to determine who the accuser was, "in the end, the nature and the volume of the evidence and Sgt. Copas's own sworn statement led me to discharge him," Zellmer said.

Military investigators wrote that Copas "engaged in at least three homosexual relationships, and is dealing with at least two jealous lovers, either of whom could be the anonymous source providing this information."

Shortly after Copas was appointed to the 82nd Airborne's highly visible All-American Chorus last May, the first e-mail came to the chorus director.

"The director brought everyone into the hallway and told us about this e-mail they had just received and blatantly asked, 'Which one of you are gay?'" Copas said.

Copas later complained to the director and his platoon sergeant, saying the questions violated "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."

"They said they would watch it in the future," Copas said. "And they said, even specifically then, 'Well, you are not gay are you?' And I said, 'no.'"

The accuser, who signed his e-mails "John Smith" or "ftbraggman," pressed Copas' superiors to take action against him or "I will inform your entire battalion of the information that I gave you."

On Dec. 2, investigators formally interviewed Copas and asked if he understood the military's policy on homosexuals, if he had any close acquaintances who were gay, and if he was involved in community theater. He answered affirmatively.

But Copas declined to answer when they asked, "Have you ever engaged in homosexual activity or conduct?" He refused to answer 19 of 47 questions before he asked for a lawyer and the interrogation stopped.

Copas said he accepted the honorable discharge to end the ordeal, to avoid lying about his sexuality and risking a perjury charge, and to keep friends from being targeted.

"It is unfair. It is unjust," he said. "Even with the policy we have, it should never have happened."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: army; dontaskdonttell; homosexualagenda; military
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 301-303 next last
To: TRY ONE

If you are a catholic priest, i'd not allow my kids alone with you. Obviously, never spent a day in uniform as your thread was ignorant and extremely stupid. A few of us in the squad bay laughed at you.


241 posted on 07/28/2006 8:38:54 AM PDT by ma bell ("Take me to Pristine. I want to see the "real terrorists", Former Marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: kenboy
So ban those with HIV or Hepatitis or whatever else you'd like to include in that category from service. I'm fine with that. Test their blood regularly, and if they come up positive, discharge them.

Why go to all that testing expense when it is far easier to just ban queers? Military service is a privilege not a right. No one is “entitled” to serve, especially if he or she does not want to follow the rules.

Article 125 of the UCMJ, as best I can tell, was included when the UCMJ was adopted in 1951. It had nothing to do with HIV, or monogamy. Under Article 125, however, oral sex in a monogamous heterosexual relationship is just as illegal as anal sex in a polygamous homosexual one.

And your point is what? The fact is that blood borne pathogens are, and, will for the foreseeable future, remain a very real and unnecessary risk from homosexual activity and subsequent battlefield injuries.

And I don't know, but I'd like to think that soldiers will risk their lives for their comrades because that's what soldiers do.

Soldiers do risk their lives for their comrades. However, it is unfair to ask them to do so with unnecessary risk from someone’s perverted and unnecessary, life style.
242 posted on 07/28/2006 8:52:20 AM PDT by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: kenboy
So ban those with HIV or Hepatitis or whatever else you'd like to include in that category from service. I'm fine with that. Test their blood regularly, and if they come up positive, discharge them.

Why go to all that testing expense when it is far easier to just ban queers? Military service is a privilege not a right. No one is “entitled” to serve, especially if he or she does not want to follow the rules.

Article 125 of the UCMJ, as best I can tell, was included when the UCMJ was adopted in 1951. It had nothing to do with HIV, or monogamy. Under Article 125, however, oral sex in a monogamous heterosexual relationship is just as illegal as anal sex in a polygamous homosexual one.

And your point is what? The fact is that blood borne pathogens are, and, will for the foreseeable future, remain a very real and unnecessary risk from homosexual activity and subsequent battlefield injuries.

And I don't know, but I'd like to think that soldiers will risk their lives for their comrades because that's what soldiers do.

Soldiers do risk their lives for their comrades. However, it is unfair to ask them to do so with unnecessary risk from someone’s perverted and unnecessary, life style.
243 posted on 07/28/2006 8:52:20 AM PDT by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: ma bell

"A few of us in the squad bay laughed at you."

I'm sure it was a Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell squad bay!


244 posted on 07/28/2006 9:07:14 AM PDT by TRY ONE (NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: FloridianBushFan
It is a shame that someone who wanted to serve his country is now unable to. He kept his private life private and who ever this source is needs to come forward and be a man and stop hiding.

Uggg.. Obviously He DIDN'T keep his private life private as most homos can't. To me this is like putting a child molester in a room full of children. I am sure others could tell, as rarely have I seen a homosexual that didn't put out the warning signs. This makes our good service men have to divert their attention away from what our soldiers are for, killing machines for our country's defense.

"Don't ask don't tell" is a joke and gays have no honorable role in our tax paid services IMHO...

Don't bother with any homophobe defense tactics, I was genetically born to retch when presented with any thought of seeing those freaks in my presence. The same genetic thought occurs when thinking we even think it is normal to put our soldiers where not only do they have to fight the enemy, but the enemy within also.

245 posted on 07/28/2006 9:15:37 AM PDT by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" - Benjamin Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
The services fought it because homos in the military are and have always been detrimental to good order.

Exactly

246 posted on 07/28/2006 9:24:44 AM PDT by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" - Benjamin Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE
and you call yourself a christian? No wonder why we Orthodox never want to accept catholics as one. Orthodox judges people based on their faith to god. I really do not care if a soldier is gay, just as long as he does his job and does it well.

You know something? He will protect you with his life and today, he is protecting you and our fellow countrymen as i write this. yet, you wouldn't defend him. How sad and hypocritical is that, scumbag. Yet, you call yourself a christian too.

247 posted on 07/28/2006 9:36:04 AM PDT by ma bell ("Take me to Pristine. I want to see the "real terrorists", Former Marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: ma bell; TRY ONE
With your interests being one-on-one basketball, who knows what you've done with other men with one-on-one.

Every now and then I run across a FR person with rude natures. Ma Bell, you rank (in more ways than one) among the top. I am forced to mentally put you in my list of complete jerks with no debating tact above a 13 y/o on an unmonitored chat site. I also like to play basketball, and your wild leap of sheer idiocy to the lowest common denominator is quite reveling. Not to my surprise, you continue down dumpster row with your other posts as well.

248 posted on 07/28/2006 9:40:30 AM PDT by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" - Benjamin Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL
Low, I really could care less what your thoughts are, just go join flame-bait in a one-on-one hoop game.

You share the idiocy of that so-called 'christian' who preaches hate and you concur with his views.

You agree with that idiot and his view that gay/lezzy soldiers are not worthy? I personally do not know of any here in my unit, but I will tell you and the other idiot something, they will risk their life for yours and his. In return, you would refuse to do the same. How shameful is that? I would say it is quite mindboggling.

249 posted on 07/28/2006 9:47:44 AM PDT by ma bell ("Take me to Pristine. I want to see the "real terrorists", Former Marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL
and you call yourself a christian? No wonder why we Orthodox never want to accept catholics as one. Orthodox judges people based on their faith to god. I really do not care if a soldier is gay, just as long as he does his job and does it well. You know something? He will protect you with his life and today, he is protecting you and our fellow countrymen as i write this. yet, you wouldn't defend him. How sad and hypocritical is that, scumbag. Yet, you call yourself a christian too.

Odd, you must have a problem with Bible believing Christians. Your problem take it up with God.

Orthodox judges people based on their faith to god.

"He who is spiritual judges all things" for "we have the mind of Christ" (1Cor. 2:15-16).

I will continue judging as the Bible says to judge.

"judge with righteous judgment" (John 7:24)

Homosexuals are disgusting and perverted. They are against nature (Rom. 1:26-27)

250 posted on 07/28/2006 9:52:34 AM PDT by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" - Benjamin Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: ma bell
You share the idiocy of that so-called 'christian' who preaches hate

Your traditions have clouded your judgment...that is sad.. but if you seriously want to debate this, lets take it up straight to the Bible and go at it.

BTW... The Bible says children that curse their parents are to be put to death. Ex. 21:17... right below the 10 commandments

What would Jesus say to this putting to death of children ?... would that be hate to him?

Answer me this ONE question... you brought up hate.. answer me this question then. Unless you are just a pertend, just as you like to shout at us.

251 posted on 07/28/2006 10:03:24 AM PDT by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" - Benjamin Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL
LOL, pertend = pretender
252 posted on 07/28/2006 10:05:40 AM PDT by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" - Benjamin Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL
Amazing, that is why Orthodox has remained the true religion and why we split from the other religious faith. I will not turn this into a religious debate so I will stop it right here.

Is that why Orthodox Priests do not have pedophiles? Getting back on track, ask your bud what his issue is. His transient belief in god does not sit well here. He decries the very person you and he ignore, that gay/lezzie will give his life for your right to post on here. yet, you want to boot him/her out of the military if they remain within the policy. You don't even know jack how accurate this article is. Yet, you decry his service. I personally could not care less if he was a fag or not. if he did his job and did it honorably, a good soldier, a good leader/nco, so be it.

253 posted on 07/28/2006 10:09:15 AM PDT by ma bell ("Take me to Pristine. I want to see the "real terrorists", Former Marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL
I will not get into a religious war on here as I'm not a debatist in that department.

My Orthodox upbringing bestows traditions and honor to what we do. We are not perfect and I do not profess to be as neither are you or anyone else.

We must all realize that all of us sin and will do so in the future.

254 posted on 07/28/2006 10:16:51 AM PDT by ma bell ("Take me to Pristine. I want to see the "real terrorists", Former Marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Lucky Dog
Why go to all that testing expense when it is far easier to just ban queers? Military service is a privilege not a right. No one is “entitled” to serve, especially if he or she does not want to follow the rules.

Why go to all that testing expense? I don't know, how about to keep soldiers with blood-borne pathogens off the battlefield and out of the ranks, where they can infect one another? Looking at CDC's numbers, there's a significant number of HIV cases that aren't caused by homosexual contact -- and since we already know, from the sheer fact that we're talking about this, that "don't ask don't tell" doesn't keep gays from joining the military, why not play it safe and eliminate the prohibition on sodomy and instead discharge those with the virus, of all genders and orientations?

Unless, of course, blood-borne pathogens are just a convenient excuse.
255 posted on 07/28/2006 10:20:14 AM PDT by kenboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: ma bell
Since you will not answer my question... probable because you will find that Jesus was a man and was not against judging people, I will answer it for you. I don't care what religion you are, titles don't impress me. I do care what Jesus says..

First off...

Jesus affirmed the Mosaic Law even to the keeping of the "least of these commandments" (Mat. 5:17-19). He blasted the Pharisees for giving their own ideas precedence over God’s commands:

"Why do you also transgress the commandment of God because of your tradition? For God commanded, saying... `He who curses father or mother, let him be put to death.’ But you say..." Mat. 15:3-4

"For laying aside the commandment of God, you hold the tradition of men..." [Jesus] said to them, "All too well you reject the commandment of God, that you may keep your tradition. For Moses said, `Honor your father and your mother’; and `He who curses father or mother, let him be put to death.’ But you say..." Mark 7:8-11

Jesus defended the OT laws... and HE condemed those that would give to their own traditions of ignoring them. Just as you ignore those that spit in God's face with their homosexuality.

Christ was not at all embarrassed over His Father’s commands. Jesus repeated these commands without caveat or reservation. Guess Jesus was a real man, not a hide from the bushes and screamer of "not real Christian"...

"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have come not to abolish them but to fulfil them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven."

I don't want to be the called the "least" in the kingdom.. You must...

256 posted on 07/28/2006 10:28:21 AM PDT by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" - Benjamin Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL

I forgot to link my last quote from the Bible above... Matthew 5:17-19 ...


257 posted on 07/28/2006 10:31:04 AM PDT by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" - Benjamin Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL
I'm proud to be Orthodox and we do not judge people. Your self-professed crusader friend is judging people. Is that right or wrong to do so? I have not judged anyone and I could not care less, good or bad what he does as long it does not harm anyone except Islamic ragheads, plain and simple.

this is one of our dogs that protects our vehicles along with us here in iraq..


258 posted on 07/28/2006 10:36:17 AM PDT by ma bell ("Take me to Pristine. I want to see the "real terrorists", Former Marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
If anonymous emails accused a soldier of screwing one of the other soldier's wives, and he refused to deny it (because he actually did it), he'd be lucky to get an honorable discharge... in a perfect world...

Actually under military law, adultery is considered a felony and you could be subjected to jail time (At least this is the case with Officers in the AF)
259 posted on 07/28/2006 10:39:36 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: ma bell
My Orthodox upbringing bestows traditions and honor to what we do.

"Why do you also transgress the commandment of God because of your tradition? .......But you say..." Mat. 15:3-4

Today's Christians are much nicer than Jesus was... perhaps they are ashamed of Him... I don't plan on playing that role if I can help it.

260 posted on 07/28/2006 10:40:43 AM PDT by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" - Benjamin Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 301-303 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson