Posted on 05/22/2006 3:26:31 PM PDT by Redcloak
LOL... Perhaps "Three Sheets To The Wind Republicans" would be a better moniker!
Do any states have laws against VUI?
"I don't like McCain. I really, really don't like McCain. But I really, really, really, really don't want Hillary to get it."
If the choice really comes down to an older, meaner, Marxist Nurse Ratched and a duplicitous, too-tightly-wrapped man who looks like his head is going to explode any second, I fear for the future of this country ... either way.
If Republicans want to win the next election, they better be looking to put a CONSERVATIVE on the ballot. A RINO will surely lose because much of the Republican base will either not vote or vote third party.
Hey Mich...If I remember correctly, the permanent members of the UN SecCouncil cannot serve at UN Sec Gen.
I had the same fear about a year ago and several FReepers posted the rules to be the SecGen of the UN and you have to come from some backwater, lame, loser, poverty stricken third world hole...
What language turned you off?
LOL
well 58 million voted for Kerry, what's that tell ya?
What's the bloody point of this poll except to make us unhappy thinking about it?
Don't trust McCain even 1% more than Hillary but I heard this weekend the IOWA GOP machine is firmly in place for him. We citizens have to wake up and make certain he doesn't carry the primaries.
Can we assume it means "third party of your choice"?
Perot didn't run in 1994. However, if incumbent liberals (Democrat and Republican) are dumped out of Congress again that would be GREAT.
Don't ask me; I'm not a moderator.
If this nightmare were to happen, we could schedule a few FR Election Day keggers around the country.
"corporate globalist masters"
"prescription for endless war"
We Constitutionalists sound like kooks when we say things like that. Damn.
... I may have to become a *Gasp!* Republican!
We (the people) no longer have any say over policy with our party in charge (of all three branches of the government).
McCain is the enemy.
Too bad you can't see beyond the letter by their name.
I voted sit it out because the option I would choose isn't there. A write in vote with neither's name.
I imagine that's how they planned it, with that assumption in mind. I'm just one of those sticklers for detail when it comes to polls.
I don't either. But, if more people joined their party they may change their attitude.
I'm tired of our dear soldiers fighting and dying to keep other nations free. I'm speaking about Europe mainly.
If Iran gets the bomb, Europe will leave it up to our blood and treasure to be spent as they sit and spew anti-American hatred. I'm tired of it. Most of Socialist Europe isn't worth one American soldier.
I'll never vote for mcpain and that *itch hillary can kiss my azz. All I'll have left is the CP. If they don't have a candidate...I won't vote.
According to what, exactly?
This question has been posed numerous times here and I have yet to see anything specific preventing such a thing.
Go for it, I'll be interested in seeing anything that would prevent the unthinkable.......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.