Skip to comments.
High efficiency flat light source could be the end for the light bulb
Gizmag ^
| 4/19/2006
| Staff
Posted on 04/19/2006 10:57:35 AM PDT by Neville72
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
To: jiggyboy
There's other, IMO more significant advantages over fluorescent lighting- LEDs are far more durable and they do not contain mercury.
21
posted on
04/19/2006 11:25:05 AM PDT
by
Squawk 8888
(Yay! It's Riding Season!)
To: Neville72
Yes, but will they make my glass Craftsman style lamps look good? That's my main question.
To: 50sDad
You can get similar products at computer stores- they plug into the computer's power supply.
23
posted on
04/19/2006 11:26:56 AM PDT
by
Squawk 8888
(Yay! It's Riding Season!)
To: Professional Engineer
Oooo, all the way up to match fluorescent.
Sure, in commercial applications there's not really an improvement over fluorescent. But I don't use fluorscents in my home because the light quality sucks. If OLEDs provide incandescent quality or better and provide energy savings, then I'll finally switch.
24
posted on
04/19/2006 11:29:30 AM PDT
by
July 4th
(A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
To: Neville72
An incandescent light bulb is more efficient as a heater than a lighter.
25
posted on
04/19/2006 11:33:32 AM PDT
by
MinstrelBoy
(Welfare shouldn't be a career choice.)
To: Neville72
26
posted on
04/19/2006 11:34:02 AM PDT
by
N3WBI3
(If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
To: orionblamblam
> 100 percent efficiency
I'm sure they meant to say 110 percent efficiency. :)
27
posted on
04/19/2006 11:34:25 AM PDT
by
JeffersonRepublic.com
(There is no truth in the news, and no news in the truth.)
To: Protagoras
Your right if it were not for ben franklin we would still be watching tv by candle light.
28
posted on
04/19/2006 11:37:46 AM PDT
by
Vaduz
(and just think how clean the cities would become again.)
To: orionblamblam
Yea, nothing better to destroy your credibility with anyone that with much of a scientific background than to claim something is 100% efficient.
These OLEDs are extremely efficient and it's possible that they are closer to 100% efficient than they are to 99% at converting electricity into the visible spectrum. However, it you want to be credible you need to specify the efficiency with enough decimal places to the point where we can see how much less it is than 100%.
It's possible that there's more loss in efficiency in the wiring that is going to the lamp than in the conversion to visible light, but I still want to see the numbers.
To: 50sDad
The real story here is a transformer that takes 5 volts DIRECT CURRENT to thousands of volts. Heretofore transformers have been Alternating Current only devices.
To: Squawk 8888; jiggyboy
There's other, IMO more significant advantages over fluorescent lighting- LEDs are far more durable and they do not contain mercury. In traffic signals they also offer redundancy. If one LED in a signal array fails, the rest of them could still be working. With tradtional incandescent bulbs, if the bulb goes out the whole signal is out. A failure to show a red light, can be catastrophic for drivers through an intersection.
To: Neville72
Wall sized UHDV screen... Oh my... Yummy.
32
posted on
04/19/2006 11:44:14 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(I believe that all government is evil, and that trying to improve it is largely a waste of time.)
To: MinstrelBoy
An incandescent light bulb is more efficient as a heater than a lighter.
This is why we are looking into the LEDs. We want good light, just not all the heat. We have enough of that in Texas.
33
posted on
04/19/2006 11:46:39 AM PDT
by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
To: Squawk 8888
The heat that fluorescent and especially incandescent lighting produces also damages fixtures over time and places a lot of limitations on how and where lighting can be placed.
It also makes a building's air conditioning system work harder to offset the heat produced by the lighting when cooling is needed.
This has a considerable potential to reduce the cost of installation, maintenance, and use. At the same time it adds a lot of options for making aesthetic improvements as well.
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
So how will we know if the light is on or off? Will we have to keep a supply of cats around to tell? As long as you don't let the cat out of the box there is no inconsistency.
35
posted on
04/19/2006 11:54:09 AM PDT
by
steve86
(Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
To: All
this is all very fascinating..... i converted to CFL's about a year ago & haven't had to change a bulb yet.
i'm imaginatively hopeful that eventually something similar to this product will cover all interior dwelling wall surfaces in replacement of paint. think of combining futuristic roll up plastic display screens for hdtv with the display changeability of a pc desktop. pc game 3d rendering
engines in conjunction with pc desktop customizability could produce the ultimate interior home decor device.
36
posted on
04/19/2006 11:54:27 AM PDT
by
Psalm_2
(1776 - !?? Dec. 7th 1941. Sept. 11th 2001. Never Forget. proud son of Pearl Harbor Survivor.)
To: 50sDad
Efficiency? We have LED lanterns that will run continuously on four D cell batteries for 17 days on 15 LED mode or 8 days at 30 LED mode. These lanterns are super bright.
To: knew it all the time
The real story here is a transformer that takes 5 volts DIRECT CURRENT to thousands of volts. Heretofore transformers have been Alternating Current only devices. Two words: Nikoli Tesla.
38
posted on
04/19/2006 12:10:11 PM PDT
by
50sDad
(ST3d: Real Star Trek 3d Chess: http://my.ohio.voyager.net/~abartmes/tactical.htm)
To: untrained skeptic
It also makes a building's air conditioning system work harder to offset the heat produced by the lighting
Especially if you use halogens! Ouch!
39
posted on
04/19/2006 12:20:25 PM PDT
by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
To: July 4th
"I don't use fluorscents in my home because the light quality sucks." You probably have that opinion because the good fluorescent lamps aren't usually available at your local hardware store.
Two thing to look for: Look for a lamp that scores at least 80% on the color rendering index. Also look for a lamp that is rated at least 5000 degree Kelvin on the color temperature index.
These minimal specs will give you a high quality color-corrected light. (If color rendering is important for your application, look for true "full spectrum" lamps: 91% CRI and 5900 degree Kelvin.)
40
posted on
04/19/2006 12:21:38 PM PDT
by
2111USMC
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson