Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tancredo Hails Demise of Senate 'Amnesty' Deal
NewsMax ^ | 04/07/2006 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 04/07/2006 1:54:01 PM PDT by NapkinUser

Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., on Friday hailed the demise of the Senate s immigration reform deal, which was brokered Thursday between Democrats and a handful of Republicans.

Cloture on the Martinez-Hagel pact was defeated in a 39-60 vote Friday morning.

"Today is a good day for America. The Senate - in a rare moment of clarity - rejected its amnesty-now, enforcement-later approach to immigration, said Tancredo.

Tancredo, an outspoken opponent of illegal immigration, said he will continue to press the issue while Congress is on recess during the next two weeks.

"Over the Easter break, I will help inform the Senators constituents of what their representatives are doing in Washington. Hopefully, listening to their electorate will chasten these Senators so that they ll put amnesty away for good.

Tancredo continued: "No amnesty bill will pass the House of Representatives so long as Republican leadership holds to its promise to block legislation that doesn t command the support of a GOP majority. Amnesty is a non-starter. If the Senate is serious about sending real security legislation to the President s desk this year, it must take a different approach.

Tancredo, the chairman of the 92-member bipartisan House Immigration Reform Caucus, had reacted strongly to the reported Senate immigration reform deal, which would provide amnesty to 10 million or more illegal aliens:

"The Democrats have once again used parliamentary tactics to obstruct the Senate from pursuing its priorities. The only difference this time is that [Senate Majority Leader Bill] Frist let them. By surrendering to the amnesty demands of Democrats and squishy Republicans, Frist squandered a great opportunity to secure our borders and gain control of our broken immigration system."

Tancredo continued his criticism of the ill-fated bill.

"The Senate amnesty deal is miserable public policy that will be rejected by the House of Representatives and has already been rejected by the American people. It continues the running joke that is our immigration system by treating the same crimes differently. In a perverse rendition of hide-and-seek, it grants a reward to those who evaded law enforcement for the longest time. And, as we did in 1986, it will encourage more illegal aliens to come into this country in the hope of yet another amnesty." The tough-talking Colorado congressman said Americans can see through the smoke-and-mirrors approach that paints immigration as a human rights issue. Rather, he said, the offer of amnest rewards criminal behavior on the part of those who enter the United States illegally.

"The Senate s amnesty authors don t dispute that their deal will offer blanket amnesty to at least 10 million illegal aliens - everyone who entered the country illegally through 2004. But they wouldn t be dealing honestly with the American people if they failed to state what will happen with the additional two million or more illegal aliens who came here more recently.

"No illegal alien with half a brain would admit that they came here after 2004," Tancredo continued. "And how could law enforcement tell? The Senate deal asks people who have broken the law for years - often using fraudulent documents - to provide proof that they ve lived here. I can guarantee that many of those fraudulent documents, which law enforcement hasn t been able to detect yet, will be used to obtain legal status."

Tancredo views the immigration issue through the lens of homeland security, with illegals posing a threat to the United States, regardless of how many of the new arrivals are genuinely interested in legal economic advancement.

"Handing out legal identification to millions of illegal aliens will expose our nation s Achilles heal more quickly than almost any single action this Congress could take, concluded Tancredo.

Tancredo also remarked about testimony before the International Relations Committee from a whistleblower at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) - the agency that would be charged with screening the 10 million illegal aliens - "who, according to Tancredo, "documented the massive fraud and mismanagement in that agency.

The lawmaker added, "USCIS has a security backlog in the millions and, in order to reduce the backlog, is encouraging adjudicators to approve visas in fewer than four minutes. It is no secret that two-thirds of foreign-born terrorists operating in the U.S. committed immigration fraud prior to or in conjunction with their terrorist activities. Piling 10 million more applications on USCIS is suicidal in terms of national security.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 109th; aliens; illegalimmigration; immigrantlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

1 posted on 04/07/2006 1:54:03 PM PDT by NapkinUser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Here's the key sentence there:

"No amnesty bill will pass the House of Representatives so long as Republican leadership holds to its promise to block legislation that doesn t command the support of a GOP majority.

- end quote -

Boehner makes me nervous- he's a RINO at heart on this issue and Bush will be twisting his arm.


2 posted on 04/07/2006 1:55:49 PM PDT by Altair333 (Please no more 'Bush's fault' posts- the joke is incredibly old)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

"Today is a good day for America. The Senate - in a rare moment of clarity - rejected its amnesty-now, enforcement-later approach to immigration, said Tancredo



TANCREDO FOR PRESIDENT


3 posted on 04/07/2006 1:56:14 PM PDT by TomasUSMC ((FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
http://www.tancredo.house.gov/press/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=1175
4 posted on 04/07/2006 1:56:52 PM PDT by NapkinUser (Secure our borders, no amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Now, let's get all the so-called business people to divest themselves of their illegal workers and put together business plans that use legal workers instead of criminal invaders.


5 posted on 04/07/2006 1:57:07 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
Exactly. The worst way to compound a bad problem is to create more of the same.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

6 posted on 04/07/2006 1:57:25 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser; Altair333; TomasUSMC

Please explain how the Senate adding "amnesty" to HR 4437 even fits that description, or how not invoking "cloture" to cut off debate is a "demise" and/or "rejection"? The more this guys talks, the more convinced I am he should never step foot in the Oval Office.


7 posted on 04/07/2006 1:59:11 PM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper

Tancredo bump!


8 posted on 04/07/2006 1:59:48 PM PDT by Rushmore Rocks (First rule of American citizenship...........SPEAK ENGLISH!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altair333

He will blow his power as a leader if he tries to strong arm Republicans into an amnesty scheme for the sake of lame duck Bush. He's not going win that one. Bush is not up for re-election but the rest of the party has to survive him. They have given Bush too much as it is.


9 posted on 04/07/2006 2:02:02 PM PDT by Galveston Grl (Getting angry and abandoning power to the Democrats is not a choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Galveston Grl

Allen-Tancredo 2008


10 posted on 04/07/2006 2:02:42 PM PDT by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
It doesn't have the votes to pass. A straightforward amnesty only measure could get through the Senate absent a filibuster. But its DOA on arrival in the House. So unless Senators come up with a bill that has good enforcement provisions in it, I don't think you'll see an acceptable immigration bill reach the President's desk this year.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

11 posted on 04/07/2006 2:04:03 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Now, let's get all the so-called business people to divest themselves of their illegal workers and put together business plans that use legal workers instead of criminal invaders

Agreed, these "business people" are nothing of the sort. They are more akin to slaveholders, using these people to enrich themselves, never passing any savings along.

Little people with their Lawn mover businesses or half ass contracting companies are the real issue here.
12 posted on 04/07/2006 2:05:26 PM PDT by Roverman2K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3

It didn't even get 40 votes, you need 51 to pass. Plus there is that filibuster hanging over it. I call that a rejection.

Enforcement, yes.
Amnesty, no.

If nothing else, I'd rather have no bill than an amnesty one with a little enforcement that will never be used.


13 posted on 04/07/2006 2:05:42 PM PDT by NapkinUser (Secure our borders, no amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Tom Tancredo for President.


14 posted on 04/07/2006 2:06:21 PM PDT by chesley (Liberals...what's not to loathe?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Illegal aliens is the new "gun control" issue like in 2000
Be on the wrong side of this issue and you will be voted from office


15 posted on 04/07/2006 2:06:51 PM PDT by Roverman2K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Now, let's get all the so-called business people to divest themselves of their illegal workers and put together business plans that use legal workers instead of criminal invaders.

Dammit. A bunch of leftist malcontents got businesses to divest themselves of any South Africa holdings because of Apartheid. There's a lot more of us and we've got a lot more resources then the leftys had back then. Let's look at what they did and see if we can try some of the same things to get businesses to divest.

16 posted on 04/07/2006 2:08:22 PM PDT by Spiff ("They start yelling, 'Murderer!' 'Traitor!' They call me by name." - Gael Murphy, Code Pink leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
Yay... Tancredo got one right.

He got this other vote wrong...

Pence/Paul in '08...

17 posted on 04/07/2006 2:08:35 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (I believe that all government is evil, and that trying to improve it is largely a waste of time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
Dump Frist!

18 posted on 04/07/2006 2:10:54 PM PDT by Savage Beast (9/11 was never repeated--thanks to President Bush and his surveillance program.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chesley
Tancredo for President!

19 posted on 04/07/2006 2:11:57 PM PDT by Savage Beast (9/11 was never repeated--thanks to President Bush and his surveillance program.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Just damn, I didn't know that.

I guess you can't expect everything.

Tancredo-Pence or Pence-Tancredo is still my 2008 dream ticket.


20 posted on 04/07/2006 2:12:01 PM PDT by NapkinUser (Secure our borders, no amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson