Democrats Pledge to 'Eliminate' Osama ("responsible redeployment of U.S. forces" from Iraq in 2006)

AP on Yahoo ^ | 3/28/06 | Liz Sidoti - ap

[Clintonfatigued]

They sure changed their tune.

[ChicagoConservative27]

Lord help us all. They wanna turn Iraq over to Terrorists.

[oceanview]

sure, the Dems are going to invade Pakistan to get OBL. right.

[marron]

So does that mean they are planning to invade Iran?

[Publius]

So Howard Dean has been sitting on Osama all this time!!

[cripplecreek]

They wouldn't change a thing.

[McGavin999]

Yeah, right, like anyone in their right mind believes that. Like the Clinton years, the military will flee as soon as their enlistments are up (remember Clinton?)

They will micro-manage the war just like LBJ and the results will be the same.

[randog]

sure, the Dems are going to invade Pakistan to get OBL.

No, the article clearly states the dems' plan:

The platform also lacks specific details of how Democrats plan to capture bin Laden...

;^)

[Yo-Yo]

So let's hear the Dim's whine that goes "if we didn't outsource our offense when we had Osama pinned down at Tora Bora..."

[muawiyah]

Better than catching Osama would be for the Democrats to purge the quislings and fifth columnists from their ranks.

Once that's done I'm sure just about anybody will be able to catch Osama.

[Billthedrill]

Gee, it seems to me we've been fighting this thing for awhile under nothing but Democratic criticism. Now they know how to win it? So what have they been waiting for?

I'd be kind of curious to know how they'd proceed if, say, we got intel that Osama was in Iran. Negotiate? Beg? Capitulate? The latter is, after all, what they did the last time the Dems were presented with an Iranian crisis, and they had control of both Houses at the time IIRC.

This is nothing but gas.

[Publius]

Do they mean to eliminate Osama or Obama? I'm getting confused. Who is Howard Dean sitting on?

[johnpaul]

Somebody tell those wahoos they are no longer in charge!

[gathersnomoss]

Bull....Clinton had his chance BEFORE 911. Kiss my @$$.

[mhking]

Uh, how do they propose this? I thought they wanted to bring all the US troops home by next Wednesday.

[starfish923]

WHAT A LOAD.

[Michael.SF.]

I am reminded of the Wood Allen line:

First, I smashed my face into his fist,
then I slammed my groin into his knee.
Boy, that really taught him a thing or two.

[SevenMinusOne]

Such a pathetic political party the Democrats have become over the last 10 years - Utterly pathetic.

At every turn it is the Democrats (with a few weak-kneed GOPers) that are trying to hurt the GWOT efforts being led by our current CIC.

The GOP / RNC needs to get on their A-game. Make the 2006 elections about National Security and lets see what happens. But this means the GOP needs to grow a spine and come out forcefully backing CIC GWB and the war in Iraq.

The GOP wins hands down in NOV if they stand firm regarding Iraq & WOT, unashamedly touting the need to GO AFTER terrorists by all means ...and then throw in the little discussed fact about our 4 year + expanding, job creating economic boom!

It is ridiculous that the GOP is playing defense on these issues.

[Howlin]

Why not? I'm sure Jay Rockerfeller knows exactly where he is.