Posted on 03/18/2006 7:03:00 PM PST by goldstategop
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
A 'what I've been trying to tell you and don't give me the same old song and dance in response because I won't listen' ping
Miss you!
Yeah. I too would not judge a woman by looks. Yes it certainly would be nice if she looked good but compared to who she is, looks are secondary.
That is quite possibly the funniest quote I have read in a decade.
(wiping away tears)
I don't think this is true. Rather, I believe it is the opposite that is more accurate. Generally speaking, it is women, not men, that are more concerned with finding the perfect "10".
Most guys are happy dating an "average looking" woman as long as she puts out a lot and makes an effort to please him.
The idea that all men want a perfect "10" is nothing more than propaganda from men-hating feminists. Most women are more than happy to accept the propaganda since it helps with their "self esteem". After all, it's easier to justify a $5000 boob job when "all men are pigs" (fiction) instead of "I'm a self-centered superficial gold digger planning to use my bigger tits to land a guy that is a "10" with money" (reality).
Ya all go to the nearest mall or other place with lots of people. Take notice of just how few women in the crowds actually look like supermodels. Darn few. If 50% of us are men and 50% are women and only 1% of them are supermodel material, well, you fill in the blanks. And BTW, most of the men aren't hunks either.
I actually prefer women who are attractive, yet not supermodel material.
GREEN WITH ENVY ALERT!
I almost hate to say it, but that's not universally true. Many women today are looking for money, status, or the indefinable 'Alpha Male' quality that only a few men posess, and won't settle for a guy who's decent, reliable, kind, and puts the seat down.
My generation craves hairless, tanned, toned, smooth men who get manicures and smell nice, and who won't argue with the women in their life. The feminists tell us that this is the only kind of man that will make us happy.
Close, but Who or what created the Ur-ideal of woman? Is it the result of historical cyclicity, or is there a deep instinctual imperative from which the perfect notion of Woman flows?
My own theory is that human nature is a sublime confluence of the animal and the Divine, made manifest in the bodily appearances of male and female. It is the latter that is most celebrated.
Not an original idea. Check out the Song of Songs.
LOL! That is one of the biggest "socially accepted" lies going around.
LOL!
Thank you, Dr. Freud for that free analysis.
Your friends, if you have any, don't think you're judgemental, do they?
***Over a century ago the ideal was a full figured woman neither too fat nor too thin.***
At that time a fat woman was considered healthy. A thin woman probably had TB, worms or some other serious health problem.
And in the Song of Songs, the beloved woman had a belly like a heap of wheat...so maybe fat was okay for Solomon, eh?
If only I could clone myself...then all manly men would be happy.
NEVER believed that I would witness a time when even marriage-minded, Orthodox men would become womanizers, giving themselves the latitude to date as many women as possible so that they can find "the best." In yeshiva I was taught one did not date a woman the way one shopped for a car. Rather, you focused on one woman completely and tried to develop a soulful connection with her without worrying about what else might be out there.
Sure, I guess we are supposed to just accept the first woman we run into, ....and her big ass? I don't think so!
Men are not looking for a dream-woman, just someone who doesn't come with their own zip-code, who can cook, knows when to shut up, and a few other things. Women no longer think that most of that is necessary anymore, so they can just marry Oprah.
Let's face it, guys are hardwired to want one thing in a mate: LOOKS.And this exchange...
And women are hardwired to want one thing too: STATUS.
Both sexes of the human race suck. All people suck! "Misfortune comes from having a body" as Lao Tzu said. Not that it matters anyway, cause we're all dying at the rate of one second per second, and in the end it's all for nothing because these tremendous big brains full of dreams and wishes become worm food, and we are released from selfhood into oblivion. --"Tucker"
Martian Anthropologist:
Men are scum. It's in the genes. It may be a lot harder for a man to find a girlfriend than it is for a woman to find herself a boyfriend, but it's also a lot harder for a woman to find a *good* boyfriend than it is for a man to find a good girlfriend. The only hope a woman has is finding a man who knows enough about evolutionary psychology to despise his own genetic programming.
David.:
*Sigh.* You know why [many] men are scum, Martian Anthropologist? Because [many] women, despite all their whinging and griping about how they want a caring, honest and loyal guy, tend to go for the bright plumage and aggressive display--leaving Mister S.N.A.G. [Sensitive New Age Guy] to sit at home on a Friday night watching Law & Order: SVU. After enough repeat episodes, Mr. S.N.A.G. finally ups and decides there's no percentage in it, and starts acting like all the jerks who're actually getting some.
Bitter, me? No, not really. Why do you ask?
lurkereh?:
And I agree, David, men are told that being sweet and nice is the way to go and for some reason women keep going for the guy who is a jerk. I think it is the challange, just like most men try to end up with women who are model material.
Thoughts?
Silicone babies?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.