Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Calls for (UN) Sanctions Against Iran (faults Bush admin. for "downplaying" the threat)
AP on Yahoo ^ | 1/18/06 | Geoff Mulvihill - ap

Posted on 01/18/2006 8:17:01 PM PST by NormsRevenge

PRINCETON, N.J. - Sen. Hillary Clinton called for United Nations sanctions against Iran as it resumes its nuclear program and faulted the Bush administration for "downplaying" the threat.

In an address Wednesday evening at Princeton University, Clinton, D-N.Y., said it was a mistake for the U.S. to have Britain, France and Germany head up nuclear talks with Iran over the past 2 1/2 years. Last week, Iran resumed nuclear research in a move Tehran claims is for energy, not weapons.

"I believe that we lost critical time in dealing with Iran because the White House chose to downplay the threats and chose to outsource the negotiations," Clinton said.

Earlier this week, a meeting in London produced no agreement among the U.S., France, Britain, Germany, Russia and China on whether to refer the dispute over Iranian nuclear enrichment to the Security Council, which could impose sanctions.

Russia and China have joined Europe and the U.S. in criticizing Iran's resumption of uranium enrichment. But both would prefer to avoid Security Council involvement and are outright opposed to sanctions, which are backed by the Bush administration.

While Clinton was critical of the administration, she never mentioned the president by name and did not engage in the same sort of sharp rhetorical attack against him or other Republicans as she did earlier this week.

Speaking Monday at a Martin Luther King Jr. memorial event in Harlem, Clinton said that the House of Representatives "has been run like a plantation" and called the Bush administration "one of the worst that has ever governed our country." The senator's remarks spurred heated reaction from Republicans.

Clinton spoke Wednesday to some 800 Princeton students, staff and alumni at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: clinton; downplaying; iran; iraniansanctions; sanctions; threat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: NormsRevenge

Bush has balls THIS BIG!

21 posted on 01/18/2006 8:28:31 PM PST by listenhillary ("Mainstream media" is creating it's own reality~everything sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Say it ain't so. I believe she is an evil, evil person. She was the brains behind all the cover ups in her husband's dealings. She even has a mean looking face.... Please Dr. Rice, run against this evil woman.


22 posted on 01/18/2006 8:28:42 PM PST by brwnsuga (Proud, Black, Conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
MSM is ignoring her plantation comments and will spin these new ones.

I truly believe that if she gets the Dem 2008 nomination everyone and their mommas will stock up on arms.

23 posted on 01/18/2006 8:29:13 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (None genuine without my signature)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Candidate Hitlery. Let the sound bites begin.


24 posted on 01/18/2006 8:29:13 PM PST by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Hillary will pull a Murtha within the next few months.


25 posted on 01/18/2006 8:29:14 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

"And now I'd like to show you the proper stance for kissing my behind..."

26 posted on 01/18/2006 8:29:50 PM PST by Mygirlsmom ("Sheep are very dim. Once they get an idea in their 'eads, there's no shiftin' it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

Of course, she would have said that Bush was "saber-rattling" if he had said what she is now suggesting.. or...not working with our allies enough or...whatever..
It's soooo obvious that these politicians (her especially) wake up every morning and wonder.....how can I make the papers today???


27 posted on 01/18/2006 8:31:36 PM PST by t2buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

"...she has 40-42% of the popular vote just for showing up."



Eliminate incarcerated felons, bought votes and the cemetary and she's down to 10-12%.


28 posted on 01/18/2006 8:31:38 PM PST by Unrepentant VN Vet (I can't really accept a welcome home until the last MIA does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: t2buckeye

Yep


29 posted on 01/18/2006 8:32:59 PM PST by beyond the sea (Cal Thomas: If only Robert Bork had cried ...................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I'm just wondering how many times she said, "you know".


30 posted on 01/18/2006 8:33:18 PM PST by SeaBiscuit (God Bless all who defend America and Friends, the rest can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I am confused. I thought the reason the Iraqis suffered so much was because of the sanctions put on Saddam. Do we want to make things bad for the Iranian people? /sarc


31 posted on 01/18/2006 8:33:54 PM PST by Stayingawayfromthedarkside (The stink you smell are the liberals fuming after Ann speaks!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Exactly...Bush hasn't been downplaying anything...I know there are some, even conservatives like Michael Ledeen that wish he would have done more before now...

But, I think his thinking has been...that there are enough young people in Iran that want to change that country...and with a democratized Iraq next door, will feel more "safe" and less "threatened"...it will give them more impetus to have their own revolution..

With America's help, of course...but, it hasn't quite gotten to that point...

Then, when that nitwit Alshamejad (sp) got elected...the rhetoric has heated up to the point that faster action seems inevitable...

BUT, I hardly would say that Bush has ignored, or down played anything.....unless, like the dems, you haven't been paying attention.


32 posted on 01/18/2006 8:34:54 PM PST by Txsleuth (Thank you to all that donated on the Freepathon...next time more monthlies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
And that is about it oceanview, 46% at best. He who think that Hillary Clinton has the slightest chance of becoming President has the political IQ of a chicken.
33 posted on 01/18/2006 8:34:54 PM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Unfortunately for her we have political ads, radio talk show, and the internet. The media cannot protect her more than they did to Kerry, and she is much worse than Kerry on all levels.
34 posted on 01/18/2006 8:37:12 PM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Sell me to Colonel Sanders, but wasn't she made co-President last time with 43% of the vote?


35 posted on 01/18/2006 8:37:45 PM PST by Mygirlsmom ("Sheep are very dim. Once they get an idea in their 'eads, there's no shiftin' it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Twunt.


36 posted on 01/18/2006 8:39:02 PM PST by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mygirlsmom

In 1992 Perot took 19% of the votes. There will be no Perot type people in 2008 so 43% will not cut for her and the democrats.


37 posted on 01/18/2006 8:40:37 PM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

OH my. Sanactions really worked so well against Iraq. We really should go down that failed excuse for a policy road again! Say Hilly where were YOU when hubby helped give N.K. their nukes?


38 posted on 01/18/2006 8:41:08 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Is there a satire god who created Al Gore for the sole purpose of making us laugh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Nothing worse than an irritating back seat driver wanna-be who doesn't know where to go.


39 posted on 01/18/2006 8:43:56 PM PST by uptoolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
she has 40-42% of the popular vote just for showing up.

Nope. Not even sure she can win the Democrat Nomination. The rabid Left is really mad at her. Give them a canidate to the Left of Hilly and she is toast. So she has to move to the Left to win the Nomination which she cannot do and win the Presidency. She is in a real jam.

40 posted on 01/18/2006 8:44:05 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Is there a satire god who created Al Gore for the sole purpose of making us laugh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson