Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Perspective: Create an e-annoyance, go to jail
Cnet News ^ | January 9, 2006 | Declan McCullagh

Posted on 01/09/2006 10:26:02 AM PST by Halgr

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: Halgr

Read their sites. Basically they don't get snail mail because of the Anthrax letters. By the way, what ever happened to that?


21 posted on 01/09/2006 11:32:54 AM PST by MiHeat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Halgr
I am simply SHOCKED to see Arlen Specter's name attached to something so dimwitted, particularly on something involving technology invented since the buggy whip. [/sarc]

Really, Specter is an ass, and shows as little understanding of the technological present day as, well, most of his fellow Congressmen. Seeing such ham-handed drivel from him is soooo common...

22 posted on 01/09/2006 11:35:31 AM PST by atomicpossum (If I don't reply, don't think you're winning. I often just don't bother to argue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halgr
If President Bush truly believed in the principle of limited government (it is in his official bio)

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

23 posted on 01/09/2006 11:37:40 AM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halgr

DU Trolls heading off to jail?

Mark


24 posted on 01/09/2006 11:52:08 AM PST by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum
Specter is an ass, and shows as little understanding of the technological present day as

You have to wonder what was the springboard for this legislation.

Is there a lobbyist out there making the case against "annoying" email?

Who would have thought of such a thing aside from the Congressional and Senate stiffs who get "annoying email" every day?

Talk about living in a bubble. This is like some screwball legislation from 1995.

25 posted on 01/09/2006 12:04:21 PM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: angkor
You have to wonder what was the springboard for this legislation.

Probably all the emails from freepers calling him a stinkin' RINO.

26 posted on 01/09/2006 12:05:24 PM PST by dirtboy (My new years resolution is to quit using taglines...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy

Not anon.


27 posted on 01/09/2006 12:47:37 PM PST by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Not anon.


28 posted on 01/09/2006 12:48:34 PM PST by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Halgr

How wonderful! An end to spam! I can't wait to tell everyone aboard the Mother Ship...


29 posted on 01/09/2006 12:53:32 PM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halgr; ninenot; sittnick; steve50; Hegemony Cricket; Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; FITZ; arete; ..
Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime. It's no joke. Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without disclosing your true identity. [...] This ridiculous prohibition, which would likely imperil much of Usenet, is buried in the so-called Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act. Criminal penalties include stiff fines and two years in prison.

"Violence Against Women"? What about the spam?

30 posted on 01/09/2006 1:10:41 PM PST by A. Pole (Franklin: "The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
So when we trash Hitlery, as long as it is not directly addressed to her, we should be OK.

Hillary Clinton? You are the one who turned this into a Hillary thread... not me.
Dick Cheney likes President Bush very much.

But I know for a fact, that Hillary likes Bush more than Dick.


Can I be the first to insult Hillary after the passage of this new law?
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
31 posted on 01/09/2006 2:16:54 PM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

You have to wonder what was the springboard for this legislation.

Probably all the emails from freepers calling him a stinkin' RINO.

LOL.....there's probably more truth to this than we know....

I've emailed him and given him a piece of my mind....LOL


32 posted on 01/09/2006 4:56:26 PM PST by Halgr (Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bkepley
Not anon.

Come on. You don't even give a clue as to state. And is it B. Kepley or B.K. Epley. Arguably anyone who doesn't post their DOB and SS number is anonymous. "bkepley hasn't created an about page."

33 posted on 01/09/2006 8:28:02 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bkepley
Im annoyed by people who ack like "Mr. Know-it-all" on the internet.

YOU don't tell me what to do.

34 posted on 01/09/2006 8:34:39 PM PST by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
If that is the case than it can be declared unconstitutional on the grounds that you cannot pass one law hidden in the fine print of another law. (I forgot the legal term for it).

Then there are the first admendment grounds.

Finally if all else fails, we start the actual shooting revolution.

35 posted on 01/09/2006 8:36:09 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan

It's all part of that "compassion"....the government will feel for you as well as think for you now.


36 posted on 01/09/2006 9:02:01 PM PST by jb6 (The Atheist/Pagan mind, a quandary wrapped in egoism and served with a side order of self importance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bkepley

As long as you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear....but just incase we'll keep passing laws until you do.


37 posted on 01/09/2006 9:02:57 PM PST by jb6 (The Atheist/Pagan mind, a quandary wrapped in egoism and served with a side order of self importance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wingnutx

I can imagine that The Most Sublime and Glorious Empress Hillary! will NOT be pleased;)


38 posted on 01/09/2006 9:03:40 PM PST by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

Yes, but outside of the loss of income to the sender, think about how rich our lawyers will continue to get. For a nation that has outsourced our manufacturing and our engineers and pretty much everything else, we've finally found a growth industry that can't be outsourced.


39 posted on 01/09/2006 9:04:36 PM PST by jb6 (The Atheist/Pagan mind, a quandary wrapped in egoism and served with a side order of self importance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum
Seeing such ham-handed drivel from him is soooo common...

Becareful, he might see that and be annoyed and then the Storm Troopers will come.

40 posted on 01/09/2006 9:07:05 PM PST by jb6 (The Atheist/Pagan mind, a quandary wrapped in egoism and served with a side order of self importance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson