Skip to comments.
Able Danger, 9-11 Report, Gorelick, and so much more...
various FR links & stories
| 08-12-05
| the heavy equipment guy
Posted on 08/12/2005 12:19:36 PM PDT by backhoe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 341-343 next last
To: Southack
To: Southack
102
posted on
08/12/2005 9:01:43 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(A person who will lie for you, will lie against you.)
To: potlatch; devolve; PhilDragoo; Smartass
Excellent "backhoe" archive.
To: backhoe
Thanks for everything that you do, backhoe!
104
posted on
08/12/2005 9:20:21 PM PDT
by
PGalt
To: ntnychik
Thanks Chik...Drip by bloody drip, the truth comes out!
105
posted on
08/12/2005 9:40:07 PM PDT
by
Smartass
(Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió)
To: ntnychik; backhoe; potlatch; devolve; Smartass; Victoria Delsoul
106
posted on
08/12/2005 10:04:22 PM PDT
by
PhilDragoo
(Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
To: PhilDragoo
Ha! Pretty good, Phil. You should include Cindy there somewhere.
To: All
Gorelick 'MemoGate': It Just Got Worse
August 12......
The AP reports tonight that 9/11 Commission co-chairs Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton have
changed their story yet again. Now the two say in a joint statement to the press that they
do recall hearing that Able Danger had identified Atta, two days after Hamilton categorically denied it -- and for a man who had supposedly never heard of Able Danger, Hamilton's recall of detail of the briefing appears impressive (via
Tom Maguire):
More on Sandy Burglar:
-- aides were looking for a memo about a briefing given to four staff members by defense intelligence officials during an overseas trip to Afghanistan, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia in the fall of 2003.
108
posted on
08/13/2005 2:00:05 AM PDT
by
backhoe
(Has that Clinton "Legacy" made *you* feel safer, yet?)
To: backhoe
Back in my intel days, we were told by everyone, including the lawyers, that we could only do stuff with Americans if we were positive they were working with a foreign government against the U.S. or were involved in drug trafficking. We had 72 hours to decide. If we were found to give the benefit of the doubt to LE, we were told we would be toast. We had to decide in favor of the enemy if there was any doubt. After the 72 hours we had to destroy everything if not 100 percent sure.
These lawyers came down form the AG. Its name was Reno. An excellent article on these 72 HOUR WINDOWS is: Letting Our Guard Down by KIRK KIDWELL How the United States is losing the espionage war Letting Our Guard Down by KIRK KIDWELL
109
posted on
08/13/2005 2:13:51 AM PDT
by
TomasUSMC
(FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
To: TomasUSMC
110
posted on
08/13/2005 2:41:01 AM PDT
by
backhoe
(Has that Clinton "Legacy" made *you* feel safer, yet?)
To: backhoe
To: nopardons
Thanks for the
Bring
Up
My
Post
112
posted on
08/13/2005 2:50:06 AM PDT
by
backhoe
(Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trakball into the Dawn of Information...)
To: backhoe
113
posted on
08/13/2005 3:26:17 AM PDT
by
HISSKGB
To: HISSKGB
114
posted on
08/13/2005 3:39:44 AM PDT
by
backhoe
(The 1990's? The Decade of Fraud(s)™...)
To: Southack
Captain V's advice is valid for all non-compromised intel agencies and government commissions. However, Captain V's advice is invalid for those commissions and intel agencies that are *actively* subverting the U.S. Oh Southack, thank you again and again for saying this and saying it so well. I was hearing, "Nobody's really responsible for this (or anything), it's just the system."
The "system" is what the people who run the system make it.
115
posted on
08/13/2005 5:57:33 AM PDT
by
Sal
(Set up to facilitate the treason of Chinagate, Gorelick's wall also facilitated 9/11. Accident ?)
To: Southack
Just so.
You left out the constant spewing of propaganda about the "findings" of this "Commission" by key " winteness" and even members of the the "Commission."
Notable among these folks has been Clarke himself, who not to long ago had an amazing piece of agit-prop that railed against the administration, the Iraq war and the WOT in general. He is foisted on used as some sort of expert and is some how supposed to be further validated as an "expert" by his performance as a "witness" in this affair>
So the subversion goes beyond what you have categorized: It is extends to what appears to be a planned, prolonged and willful attempt to mislead the nation out side of the confines proper of the ambit of that commissions rights, duties and obligations.
To: backhoe
117
posted on
08/13/2005 7:52:20 AM PDT
by
combat_boots
(Dug in and not budging an inch. NOT to be schiavoed, greered, or felosed as a patient)
To: combat_boots
118
posted on
08/13/2005 7:54:12 AM PDT
by
backhoe
(The 1990's? The Decade of Fraud(s)™...)
Too important to miss BUMP
To: All
Watching Weldon now. This is explosive.
They desperately want to bury this one.
Able Danger disabled -- THE report of the 9/11 commission, once a best seller and hailed by the news media as the definitive word on the subject, must now be moved to the fiction shelves.
Able Danger has changed all of that.
-- and also in response to the recent Naral t.v. adds what we need is a 60 second video that shows it all
The cover up created by Jamie's Wall with background music by Pink Floyd's the "wall" of course.
Read the links and commentary here:
120
posted on
08/13/2005 9:38:49 AM PDT
by
backhoe
(Has that Clinton "Legacy" made *you* feel safer, yet?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 341-343 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson