When Leninists rule the nation - (SCOTUS decision bodes ill for American liberties)

WORLD NET DAILY.COM ^ | JUNE 25, 2005 | RUDY TAKALA

[Calpernia]

Look at goal 22 and 23 here.

Now think about the IFC Memorial.

[Velveeta]

That's a match.
Thanks for the ping.

[Itzlzha]

WND has some nasty stuff. Great anger at SCOTUS is justified here, as so often. But calling them Leninists is over the top. The kind of wigged-out wackery we saw from "DurbinLaden," et al. We need to be better than that, folks.

OK..then you tell me...if the Senile 5 WERE avowed Marxists, how would their ruling be any different?

Same goes for ANY ruling that abrogates/supersedes/TRASHES the US Constitution...on any potential Second Ammendment ruling that outlaws PRIVATE ownership of weapons...how would a REAL Marxist rule differently?

Calling a spade a spade is NOT hyperbole...and calling for REVOLUTION is NOT out of the question!

We are ulrimately talking about the supremacy of the STATE over ANY individuals rights...that is NOT what the American Revolution was about...nor is it what the US Constitution EXPRESSLY says...it is what our Feudal Lords and the Robed Nazgul that sit in judgement are INTERPERETING the words to say...kinda like "Double PLUS Un-Good", dontcha think?

[oblomov]

For some time I planned to save up to buy rural land (which would include some tillable land that I could rent out) as both an investment and possible 2nd home site. No more. This ruling adds an encumbrance on all real property, especially raw land. In the future, I'll simply buy gold and silver as a hard asset diversification. If things get even worse from the standpoint of individual liberty, then I expect precious metals to perform much better than financial assets.

[Psion]

Excellent article.................by the way Charlotte, is there some problem with Michael? His mailed to you is returned as blocked!

[metesky]

Wrong person.

[TheeOhioInfidel]

If he is fiddling, then why does the left have calls out for his assassination?

Because the left is beyond pernicious and diabolical. They're trying to hang him with his own rope. For whatever faults Bush has, the left is exponentially worse.
All I'm saying is that time and again -when we need a leader to step to the plate about the momentous issues that get to the heart of being American(Eminent domain, ten comm. postings, selling out to China, illegal aliens, outourcing, taking it to terrorists hardcore, etc., Schiavo,etc.)-Bush fails to show up at bat. I for one am sick of rooting for him, although I wish someone could give me a reason to. Remember that Bush I and Reagan court appointees are betraying the constitution as well.

[swampfox98]

The Supreme Court has closer ties to Lenin than to the framers of our Constitution. The ACLU is so close to their goal of destroying America from within. A hair's breath, actually. Every month they get closer and closer, with the help of the country's highest court.

[Calpernia]

>>>>Remember that Bush I and Reagan court appointees are betraying the constitution as well.

That might have something to do with this:

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b0c30a81760.htm
Annan in historic meeting with Supreme Court &Congress/is believed to be unprecedented.

>>>Because the left is beyond pernicious and diabolical. They're trying to hang him with his own rope. For whatever faults Bush has, the left is exponentially worse.

I disagree. Bush is stepping up to the plate which is why they are calling for his head.

[Calpernia]

Thanks to the National Lawyers Guild.

[Truthsayer20]

You are exactly right -- the decision has nothing to do with "leninism".

[TheeOhioInfidel]

I disagree. Bush is stepping up to the plate.


I hope you're correct, but why has he not commented publically one the supreme court decision. And, the recent talks with the Vietnamese dictator seem insulting to both those who served in Vietnam as well as to our manufacturing base. All this talk of WTO seems a little sell out to me, unless Bush needs as many friends as possible in the wake of an ever dangerous China. Not to get off topic though.

[sarasmom]

LOL!
No, and I am moving to a cheaper place soon.
My point was, for what you pay in taxes, I pay for a better than decent place to live.
I know of many areas that even if I were given a home "free of mortgage", I could not afford to live in it, due to taxes.
That is just wrong, on so many levels.
Every year,everywhere, my rent has always gone up, mostly due to taxes.
I can't withhold any portion of my rent in a tax revolt, that's not how it works for a tenant.
I wonder what would happen if a grass root level firestorm of homeowners and landlords skipped a tax payment or two. nationwide?

[Calpernia]

>>>>I hope you're correct, but why has he not commented publically one the supreme court decision.

He will respond. He just doesn't give the expected reaction that the left sets him up with.

>>>And, the recent talks with the Vietnamese dictator seem insulting to both those who served in Vietnam as well as to our manufacturing base.

There was two different versions of a press release on these talks. Both are posted here.

The real interesting one was terms and conditions for accounting for our POWs remains and what happened to them.

McCain and Kerry are deeply saddened.