Posted on 01/08/2005 8:52:22 PM PST by rvoitier
That really was cheeky.
But then, I guess the king of cheeky would have an easy time of that.
Hey, what about Maine!! We got Snowe & Collins!! AGH!!
Typical Kerry - letting Boxer, Tubbs-Jones, and assorted other women carry his water for him while he galivants around the globe.
When was the last time he actually visited and voted in the senate?
I am happy it is not Syrian President Bashar al-Assad (L) and U.S. President John Kerry
why does he have to cross his legs like a GIRL?!?!?!?
Proven to be a traitor in the past....I'd say what he's up to is same ole same ole...he is a sorry SOB!!! He hates America and all it stands for.
I don't get it.
If I were a high profile middle eastern leader with terrorist leanings, and my chief aide came up to me and said "Sir, the loser of the US Presidential election would like to meet with you." I'd say "Yeah, that's gonna happen. When the "winner" calls, set up the meeting."
The loser is just exactly that, a loser!!.....
Didn't Bob Denver get another gig, the one where Jim Backus goes "Luuuuvy! Luuuvy, look what Gilligan's got up to!"
John Kerry, reprising his role of meeting with the enemy.
The Dems are coordinating with foreign leaders to undermine Bush's foreign policy. They call it "political globalization". Any leader who doesn't want Bush to succeed would certainly be tempted to give them a listen.
The effort is being led by Biden and Hillary Clinton (and her husband, I'm sure). The day-to-day coordination is done by high-level Dem political consultants like Ron Klain and Stan Greenburg.
Now, you may think it sounds like I'm wearing a tinfoil hat. But, read it for yourself. At the height of the U.S. effort to recruit support for preemptive war in Iraq, the Dems were establishing new coordination with their Euro socialist counterparts to drum up opposition to Bush and the American agenda. It is no coincidence that the Dems seem to benefit from European anti-Americanism.
ping
By the same token, the more opposition they display to Bush and the American agenda, the more congressional seats and governorships they lose.
I say let them have at it.
I just can't understand why a sitting, foreign leader of any description would waste his time meeting with a loser. The loser, by definition, has no influence or power whatsoever. Anything out of his mouth is going to sound like sour grapes.
I don't get the meaning of either the "SafrGuns" or the "SayferBullets" graphics From the Clinton era... Joycelyn Elders... Condom Queen... her quote: "We need safer guns and safer bullets" |
Aha! Thanks! I didn't interpret the wireframe as a polymer membrane...
One in the same.
Which begs the question: who really is John F. Kerry: Maynard or Thurston Howell III? I suggest he is a sinister combination of the two. :)
I don't understand what you see as "respectable".... Have you noticed how many of them are now working on FOREIGN political campaigns?! The Dems found that Americans don't respond well to their leftist, socialist, touchy-feely agenda. So they expanded their horizons and are now building coalitions among supposed allies who, in reality, want to do anything to diminish the power of our country. I thought it was respectable of him to concede as he did. I thought it respectable of him to publicly announce that he was not joining in the objection to Ohio electors. If I had been Kerry,(God forbid), I would NOT want to be in congress as the debate over Ohio electors was taking place.... anywhere but congress. I think it's ok to recognize a respectable act even when it's committed by a totally reprehesible person. I think your correct about dems expanding their influence into world politics in reaction to their defeat at the polls.... very insightful... thanks. |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.