Posted on 09/07/2004 8:35:06 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
If you can link that to Bush, it would be in play. ;-)
Yes, I agree, but a change in ocean currents could also bring about such a change, and if located at some distance from the pole, it wouldn't have to be quite as dramatic.
By deductive logic and inference, we must inevitably conclude that there were precursor-rodents running around whining about dinosaur farts - and their direct causation of global warming.
How long until they dig up a Palaeocene-Eocene SUV ?
These are the cause of global warming.
Well, it turns out that 55 million years ago the Arctic ocean and the underlying crust was just about where it is now. 55 million years isn't so long in the geologic scheme of things.
So, I'm going over to the wobble school and the solar variation hypothesis.
Otherwise, I have to go with the dinosaur SUV hypothesis, and I don't want to be forced to go there!
Darnit, that was going to be MY line! Great minds...
Yes, there are fluctuating temperature gradients associated with solar energy absorbed during this process. Thank you for citing the source.
Quite true. And, he received three Purple Trilobites.
Well, the DINOsaurs had SUVs before they didn't have them.
Also I found this...
50 million years ago.
Well, if it hadn't been for those danged SUVs, oh wait, nevermind.
We've known for decades that there are petrified hardwood forests buried under the ice of Antartica. The earth's weather was drastically different even in comparatively recent times.
Consider that less than 40,000 years ago, northern Africa was a verdant grass and forest land with many large rivers besides the Nile, supporting herds of large animals to a similar extent to what the plains of central and southern Africa do now.
Estimate the amount by which the water will rise, and start buying future beach front property. //humor
That is absolutely true, the sun varies its output much like a boiling pot of oatmeal varies in is energy output. However, the pot of oatmeal’s variations are over very short time periods. The Sun on the other hand has variations in its output over (what seems to us) long periods.
In addition to this the Sun has electro-magnetic ‘weather’, over both a short (sun spots and flares) and long (hydrogen gets used up and not enough heat/pressure for helium fusion, luminosity and surface temperature decrease).
This is based on models and is of course dogma, but from our observations of the sun it is the main determinant of earths temperature.
People (ahem, environmentalists) seem to forget that photosynthetic organisms fix CO2, so it is unlikely that life will not compensate for the extra gas. In addition, we are liberating CO2 that has already been fixed by plants long ago! These are FOSSIL fuels, they only left the ecosystem by some fluke.
In addition, humans are only responsible for like 3 or 4% of CO2 production each year and if I remember correctly algae and not rainforests are the largest fixers of CO2(another lie from environmentalists).
Fitness of Model:
Ockham’s razor failed
Model does not reproduce data
No correlation
Correlation with other variable
Next!
PS. There is also the wobble/tilt effect, but that would effect seasons not long term stuff.
Likewise, today there exists a snow and ice covered piece of real estate that was named Greenland not too many centuries ago.
Sheesh dude
I stand corrected.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.