Iraq and 9/11: What the Judge Said

NewsMax.com ^ | May 28, 2004 | Carl Limbacher

[Peach]

The administration does not deny that such a connection exists but says there has been no proof. I think there is adequate proof and can only assume there are reasons why they phrase their responses that way.

[VOA]

bump

[WOSG]

"Finally, plaintiffs also place considerable weight on an article that appeared in a regional Iraqi newspaper in July 2001, two months before the disaster of September 11. This article, a paean to bin Laden, mentions that bin Laden 1] 'will try to bomb the Pentagon after he destroys the White House,' 2] 'is insisting very convincingly that he will strike America on the arm that is already hurting,' and 3] 'will curse the memory of Frank Sinatra every time he hears his songs.' See Exs. 16-18, Naeem Abd Muhalhal, America, An Obsession Called Osama Bin Ladin, Al-Nasiriya, July 21, 2001 [original, translation, and certificate of accuracy of translation].

I didnt know Bin Laden had a Frank Sinatra problem.... hmmm.

[jnarcus]

Your moniker and your home page tell us all we need to know....Canucks always show their true colors

[Triple]

Reading your 31- You still cite no basis for your objection. You merely give some (1) good reason(s) to suspect this judge's decision making.

[Alberta's Child]

If you read through the text of the judge's decision, you'll notice that almost everything he cites is based on mere speculation and unfounded allegations. I would also point out that this was nothing more than a show trial aimed only at lending some credibility to the speculation about the "Iraqi connection." The trial was as meaningless as the $104 million judgement that was handed down against Iraq.

[texasflower]

But what did Ol' Blue Eyes do to get on Allah's s***t list?

Osama is referring to the song, "New York, New York". As in, "I am going to destroy New York.