Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam Behind Anthrax Attacks?
Accuracy In Media ^ | January 1, 2004 | Cliff Kincaid

Posted on 01/05/2004 7:37:52 PM PST by joinedafterattack

In a major development, potentially as significant as the capture of Saddam Hussein, investigative journalist Richard Miniter says there is evidence to indicate Saddam’s anthrax program was capable of producing the kind of anthrax that hit America shortly after 9/11. Miniter, author of Losing bin Laden, told Accuracy in Media that during November he interviewed U.S. weapons inspector Dr. David Kay in Baghdad and that he was "absolutely shocked and astonished" at the sophistication of the Iraqi program.....Miniter said that Kay told him that, "the Iraqis had developed new techniques for drying and milling anthrax—techniques that were superior to anything the United States or the old Soviet Union had.....In a development that has received little media attention, an article in the November 28th issue of Science magazine focuses on the testimony of experts that the nature of the anthrax used against America.....

Full Article Here:
http://www.aim.org/publications/media_monitor/2004/01/01.html

(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...


TOPICS: Anthrax Scare; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aim; amerithrax; anthrax; antraz; bw; hussein; iraq; iraqiwmds; kay; miniter; saddam; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Very Important Read
1 posted on 01/05/2004 7:37:52 PM PST by joinedafterattack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
54 Turkey 10.00
1
10.00
10
1.00


Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

2 posted on 01/05/2004 7:39:01 PM PST by Support Free Republic (Freepers post from sun to sun, but a fundraiser bot's work is never done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack
If true the FBI owes one scientist and a couple of ponds in Maryland an apology.
3 posted on 01/05/2004 7:40:22 PM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
In a major development, potentially as significant as the capture of Saddam Hussein, investigative journalist Richard Miniter says there is evidence to indicate Saddam’s anthrax program was capable of producing the kind of anthrax that hit America shortly after 9/11. Miniter, author of Losing bin Laden, told Accuracy in Media that during November he interviewed U.S. weapons inspector Dr. David Kay in Baghdad and that he was "absolutely shocked and astonished" at the sophistication of the Iraqi program.

Miniter said that Kay told him that, "the Iraqis had developed new techniques for drying and milling anthrax—techniques that were superior to anything the United States or the old Soviet Union had. That would make the former regime of Saddam Hussein the most sophisticated manufacturer of anthrax in the world." Miniter said there are "intriguing similarities" between the nature of the anthrax that could be produced by Saddam and what hit America after 9/11. The key similarity is that the anthrax is produced in such a way that "hangs in the air much longer than anthrax normally would" and is therefore more lethal.

Nevertheless, the FBI has been operating on the assumption that it was produced by a disgruntled American scientist, perhaps in a basement. The FBI wasted hundreds of thousands of dollars investigating the possibility that the anthrax letters were packaged underwater in a Maryland pond in a special device of some sort.

In a development that has received little media attention, an article in the November 28th issue of Science magazine focuses on the testimony of experts that the nature of the anthrax used against America constituted a major advance in biological weapons technology. The article notes that analysts in the U.S. Army detected silica coatings on the anthrax sent to the U.S. Senate and that special chemicals were used to enhance its ability to form a lethal aerosol. One of those was a super-specialized binder chemical used to keep the silica particles in place on the surface of the spores.

One of the experts quoted in the article told us that, "In my opinion it would be impossible to manufacture a powder like this without state-sponsorship… These are super-specialized areas—and once it is understood just how difficult it is to process powders with these coatings, it becomes immediately obvious that only a highly disciplined state-sponsored program could have achieved this."

Many reports in the media, including Washington Post reporter Marilyn Thompson’s book on the anthrax attacks, have claimed that the Ames strain of anthrax used in the attacks was a U.S. "military strain" and was therefore probably made in the U.S. But experts say the Ames strain was provided to laboratories around the world. The expert told us that, "Far too much focus has been placed on the genetic and DNA analysis of the senate anthrax" which has identified it as the Ames strain. "The real key to finding out who did it is not the DNA analysis, but the analysis of the coatings that were used." He said David Kay should be looking for scientists in Iraq who have developed this technology.

Cliff Kincaid is the Editor of the AIM Report and can be reached at aimeditor@yahoo.com
4 posted on 01/05/2004 7:40:28 PM PST by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack
Link to first posting
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1050309/posts
5 posted on 01/05/2004 7:41:44 PM PST by ironman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack
1998 - "Man suspected of having anthrax predicted attack ; Harris told talk show Iraqis poised to strike," CNN
6 posted on 01/05/2004 7:42:17 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack
wow.
7 posted on 01/05/2004 7:43:12 PM PST by cookcounty (Howard Dean, mayor of a picturesque small town in New England.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack; JustPiper
Bump/Ping
8 posted on 01/05/2004 7:43:13 PM PST by Pro-Bush (Homeland Security + Tom Ridge = Open Borders --> Demand Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack; Admin Moderator
Already posted
9 posted on 01/05/2004 7:43:34 PM PST by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack
Nevertheless, the FBI has been operating on the assumption that it was produced by a disgruntled American scientist, perhaps in a basement. The FBI wasted hundreds of thousands of dollars investigating the possibility that the anthrax letters were packaged underwater in a Maryland pond in a special device of some sort.

This is old news. I read an article in the LA Times almost a year ago that said the FBI made a mistake in pursuing the domestic terrorist angle. The antrhax was clearly state sponsored, but they wasted valuable time looking at domestic suspects. It was well known that Iraq had a sohpisticated Antrax program.

I think I read the Science article. Someone posted it. It said the American scientists could only recreate it using very sophisticated processes.

10 posted on 01/05/2004 7:44:30 PM PST by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smogger
It may be old news, but about the only place it's being reported is here in FreeRepublic. The FBI will never get off their butts if they aren't prodded on this. Sessions is either a moron or a traitor. He has not put a leash on a single one of the clintonoids at the top of the bureau.
11 posted on 01/05/2004 8:00:15 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
If true the FBI owes one scientist and a couple of ponds in Maryland an apology.

Not just an apology. What about a few million bucks?

12 posted on 01/05/2004 8:02:33 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
"Sessions is either a moron or a traitor."

Pssssst! Sessions has been gone since 1993. Bubba fired him just before Vince Foster was found in Fort Marcy Park.

Louis Freeh's time has come and gone, too. The current "moron or traitor" is Robert Mueller.

13 posted on 01/05/2004 8:07:10 PM PST by okie01 (www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Smogger
Make me a case as to why Iraq had a specific beef against Daschle and Leahy, out of the hundreds of prominent government figures they could have sent letters to.

(Sound of crickets in the background)
14 posted on 01/05/2004 8:17:33 PM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: John H K
Whoever sent those letter knew that they would never be opened or read by Dashcle and Leahy. They knew how potent that weaponized Anthrax was. They wanted to see what would happen when they put it in the mail. I bet it exceeded their wildest expectations.
15 posted on 01/05/2004 9:18:15 PM PST by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: John H K
My brother was in Special Forces for 28 years and his explanation of the whole thing is that it was a test of how we as a country would respond. Trying to explain why one Senator got it over another is not material. How else do you explain that one letter had weaponized anthrax and the others did not. It was a test to see the results to be analyzed for a future attack.

Before we went into Iraq my brother said we would not find WMD. He stated, and this may be the case, that if he were Saddam he would have destroyed all but 1 to 2 litters of anthrax. You don't need more than this to create major harm and the chance of hiding it to never be found it increased with such a small amount. If one weaponized letter of anthrax to a senator could potentially kill 100,000 people you don't need more than a litter.
16 posted on 01/05/2004 9:43:54 PM PST by joinedafterattack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: John H K
John H K asks:   "Make me a case as to why Iraq had a specific beef against Daschle and Leahy..."

Your question is flawed because it presumes something not in evidence, i.e., "Iraq had a specific beef". If you remove the presumption, then your question answers itself, they were targeted simply because they were prominent government officials.

--Boot Hill

17 posted on 01/05/2004 11:26:01 PM PST by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Allan
Unless specified we cannot post the article in its entirety, we should, the other thread could and did not
18 posted on 01/06/2004 6:04:03 AM PST by JustPiper (Register Independent and Write-In Tancredo for March !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pro-Bush; gubamyster; FairOpinion; FoxFang; FITZ; moehoward; Nea Wood; Joe Hadenuf; sangoo; ...
BumPing!
19 posted on 01/06/2004 6:05:03 AM PST by JustPiper (Register Independent and Write-In Tancredo for March !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill
Or, not merely prominant government officials, but those with a Capital Hill mailing address.

A terrorist who knew the routing single-piece FCM might take from entry at Boca Raton to DC could have been aiming to disable several important postal facilities.

20 posted on 01/06/2004 7:00:30 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson