[Graymatter]

>>What he should do is divorce her.

Because? Koch doesn't say. Let me try.

In what sense is this a marriage? Among the characteristics of the state of matrimony, companionship, exclusivity, cohabitation, actual or potential parenthood, and mutual interests and goals.
Hmmm...Nope. Michael and Terri don't have any of that.

In what sense does Michael Schiavo WANT to be Terri's husband? Does he want to live with her, be a companion to her, be faithful to her, have a family with her? NO. He just wants to be her husband in order to end her life (and possibly to benefit financially thereby).

That's why he should divorce her, and why he won't.

[kenth]

He just wants to be her husband in order to end her life

You know, it can't be said any plainer than that. This is a man who professes to love her, while bearing children and living with another. That contradiction of clintonian proportions alone should be enough to convince people that he is not sincere in his proclaimed committment to Terri. Since it is not, Graymatter's statement above should be a slap in the face of those who still suck up Michael Schiavo's lies.

He's only going to consider himself in a marriage to Terri just long enough to have her killed. He's planning on divorcing himself from Terri, but only after he's made sure she's dead. How much clearer do his motives need to be? How many ways can it be said?

Good to see even Ed finally realized this wasn't the right-to-die case the media is so desperately trying to make it seem.