Posted on 06/25/2016 9:09:04 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
LOVE HIM or hate him, there’s never been a presidential candidate quite like Donald Trump, and there’s never been a presidential campaign season quite like this. All the ordinary rules etched into political science textbooks about how politicians should walk, talk and strategize have been tossed out the window.
It’s a new political world, and that makes the political-prediction business as unreliable as the weather—and at times, as volatile as hurricane season.
But this is precisely why at this chaotic moment in U.S. history, when it feels as though almost anything can happen, Trump will likely pick as his vice-presidential running mate Newt Gingrich, a well-established, well-known political insider. The Gingrich choice would expand Trump’s image as a renegade outsider hell-bent on tearing down the status quo, by bringing in a politically experienced and astute partner whose mastery of the inside game of national politics once made him extraordinarily effective in forcing change.
Gingrich would surely be an interesting pick. Despite his long history in the Republican Party, he doesn’t fit the conventional mold for a modern Republican vice-presidential candidate. He isn’t young and energetic; he can’t deliver Trump an important swing state such as Iowa, Florida or Ohio; and he wouldn’t make a particularly spectacular ambassador to minority groups, those living in urban city centers, or to women—groups polling show Trump is struggling to win over.
What Gingrich can bring to the table, however, is a storied, policy-centered past. As speaker of the House from 1995 through 1998, he achieved several important, pro-liberty policy victories.
In 1996, Gingrich worked to implement much-needed welfare reform, which led to a nationwide decline in welfare rolls of 70 percent. Many of the reform ideas Gingrich promoted and urged lawmakers to adopt at the state level—including time limits, work requirements and asset tests—are still being discussed and advanced today in state capitals across the country.
Throughout the 1990s, Gingrich and the Republican-led Congress oversaw tremendous economic growth, and under Gingrich’s leadership, Republicans demanded President Bill Clinton agree to important government spending cuts, which eventually led to a budget surplus, a feat that now seems virtually unthinkable. They accomplished all this despite reports released in 1995 from the Office of Management and Budget and the Congressional Budget Office predicting $200 billion budget deficits for the rest of the 1990s.
Gingrich’s congressional history, while impressive, is by no means a perfect picture of pure conservatism. In the 1980s, Gingrich opposed drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, before reversing course on drilling in the late 2000s. In the 1990s, Gingrich supported a government-imposed individual health insurance mandate. In 2008, he acknowledged on ABC’s “This Week” he would have voted “reluctantly” for bailing out failing billion-dollar banks had he still been in Congress.
Although Gingrich may not be the most charismatic or exciting potential vice- presidential pick, he does have something to offer almost everyone Trump needs to bring together if he’s going to capture the White House in November.
Gingrich is one of the few mainstream conservative voices to have supported Trump from the beginning (or close to it), making him a palatable choice for Trump’s devoted base. Gingrich can appeal to middle-of-the-road voters and those skeptical of Trump’s lack of governing experience, thanks to his own decades-long career in Washington.
Gingrich would also likely help Trump appeal to the “Never Trump” crowd concerned about the real estate mogul’s left-leaning past and history of supporting Democratic Party candidates, including Hillary Clinton herself. Perhaps conservatives would see Gingrich as a reliable agent able to ensure Trump chooses true constitutionalists to fill current and future Supreme Court vacancies.
Most important, in a year when few may actually be willing to sign on to Trump’s controversial campaign, Gingrich has repeatedly indicated he is interested in the job—and that may very well prove to be the most important qualification of all.
Newt? No.
Prepare for shock and awe.
Doubtful. Many are in for a big Surprise.
Bo Derek
“Newt would destroy whomever he faced in the debate”
Nope! The media would find a reason to not air the debate live and then edit the crap out of it so Newt would look like a idiot.
Newt would be a good choice. Cruz would be a horrible pick, Cruz is a lying dirt bag that is hated by just about everyone other then his cult followers. Right this very minute Cruz and his bots are plotting to ignore the will of the people and nominate someone (Cruz) other then Trump. Cruz is a #NeverTrumper.
I am hoping Abbott takes Ted Senate seat, if not Abbott than maybe Dan Patrick? One of those two should primary Cruz.
Yes!!!!! Lieutenant Dan for V.P.!
Seriously, Mr.Sinise is a patriot and cares deeply about veterans. He does a lot for wounded warriors, IIRC. People would love him.
I think a woman or black or both is the way to go.
At best? Ted is too immature for veep. At worst? Well I could go on and not even include his being not a NBS.
If Trump were to get Governor Susana Martinez, he would do much to mend fences that he has broken during the primary battle. Martinez has a lot of clout as the chairman of the Republican Governor’s Association and having this association going to bat for Trump would be a big boost for his campaign.
Why not Abbott for VP?
I'd like to see Abbott in the Senate (Cruz's seat).
“If I had to make a bet I’d say that the VP will be either Newt or Cruz.
Despite all that happened during the campaign, Trump likes Cruz and donated to him years ago when he had no reason to do so. Cruz is already parroting the Trump talking points and is not even on the ticket.”
Either of those two would be horrible choices.
I think Trump was seriously considering Cruz at one point, but Cruz’s behaving like a smarmy. narcissistic jerk at the debates killed any hope of that (not to mention Trump has called him a liar about 10,000 times - how do you say that and THEN choose the guy as your running mate?).
Newt has a gigantic ego AND is undependable. A couple of weeks ago he was perfectly comfortable attacking Trump after his comments about the Judge in his civil case - it seemed to me then that he’d probably gotten the word the VP spot wasn’t going to be his.
Can see Abbott anywhere
But Newt is slime personified for many voters and his wife is ommipresent and unattractive.
“How about Iowa’s Joni Ernst?”
About about NOT picking someone because they’re a woman, black, gay, a dwarf or a space alien?
Leave the identity politics BS to the left.
Yes!
I agree. But the main job of the VP will be to defend every single one of Trump’s positions on the VP debate.
Cruz agrees with most of them and can do it. The same goes for Newt. I don’t really like either one of them but they can handle a debate against any democrat.
To pick someone who hasn’t been tested and is not fully on board can be a disaster.
Well that is the downside to Newt, lots of baggage.
language
Cotton sounds like a good choice.
I would love to see Newt as press secretary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.