Posted on 05/25/2016 8:27:14 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
I think the DemocRATS will go “sauve qui peut”, let Hillary run and get crushed while trying to save state and local seats. Hillary may be a disaster but Biden is a loser too.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the October surprise will be the passing of Bill Clinton. As suspicious as I would be about the timing, the sheep would give her a ton of sympathy votes. She would privately not care at all about it, but everywhere she goes she would cry and say “Bill would want me to continue on.”
She’ll have a new campaign theme - “We must elect Hillary! so she can pardon herself!”.
Bill dying to get the Hillary-sympathy voters?
Could be, could be. Bill would be susceptible to even more likely threats ... if he were living with Hillary though.
Hard to imagine a ex-president needin SS protection from his wife though, isn’t it?
Certainly fits his psychological profile!
Biden runs stronger than Hillary. Will help them down-ticket even if he should lose. If the Dems have ideas of taking the senate, getting rid of Hillary is the safe play.
The question is: will former President Obama's permanent Secret Service detail stand idly by while Obama foments a coup d'etat against the current President, or will they be loyal to the Constitution and the Treasury Department and speak out and refuse to protect him while he agitates against his own country?
-PJ
“white hot hatred she reserves for the man who scotched her absolute best chance at achieving her goal on a mild early September morning in 2001.” (Osama bin Laden)
Interesting thoughts. Take that one step further and it explains even more.
That white hot hatred, if it were pointed in the direction of the 2 people who had multiple chances to kill Bin Laden after the 1993 WTC attack, would be directed squarely at the Bill-Hillary co-Presidency. When Bin Laden was spotted in Afghanistan and our military was begging for orders to turn him into dust, ‘ol Bill was out on the golf course and wouldn’t give the orders. (I’d love to know what Hillary was doing on that day in 1998).
If it weren’t for all the dead people caused by their inaction from ‘93 to 2000, we could be happy at the full circle of justice that kept her out of our White House.
A very interesting perspective. Bush would have been vulnerable, if for no other reason than many already considered him an illegitimate president elected by a minority of the voters. And Bush turned out to be an ineffective president at that, though that became clearer in the second term. Lacking 9/11 he may have been seen that way much earlier. Thanks for posting this.
True enough. But who will bell the cat and tell her to drop out?
It's the Muslim issue which he will use to get a place at the world leftist roundtable. He will become very valuable to nations that oppose America.
The Secret Service will be bound to protect him physically, and will be true to their oath. But he's a tight-rope walker, will overstep, and stumble at some point. He is delusional, a narcissist, and will find there's a great deal more animosity toward him than people are willing to express right now. Because racism. This will change.
IMHO he'll end up behind bars, not necessarily in this country.
*THAT*, in a nutshell was her secret weapon (albeit not so secret) for the 2004 campaign. Her entire strategy hinged on that, but when Mohammed Atta and crew struck, and the towers came down, her entire strategy became unglued in a "rally 'round the flag" moment. She never recovered from this, and in the final analysis, it cost her the chance to ever gain the Presidency (she has been shown to be vulnerable, and there is now little chance for her to achieve her goal.)
As Nita pointed out, the persons *most* responsible for this situation are in fact, the Clintons themselves, as they had the opportunity to take out OBL, and passed on it. If they knew then, what they now know, OBL would have been a grease spot almost immediately upon learning that the opportunity to remove him had arisen. Since the Clintons mentally cannot fault themselves for anything (a trait they share in copious abundance with their fellow travelers), they have to blame OBL...
the infowarrior
Hmmm... How enthusiastically did the Clintons campaign for Gore to win in 2000? And how hard did Bill fight for Gore in the Gore vs Bush court actions in Dec 2000? I wasn’t really paying attention because of the hanging chad fiasco. Hillary’s plan for 2004 would have necessitated a Bush win in ‘00 so she could run against him in ‘04.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.