Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jeb Bush: Unlike certain Republican candidates, I don’t bend with the wind on immigration
Hot Air ^ | May 28, 2015 | Allahpundit

Posted on 05/28/2015 7:00:11 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

He said this on a conference call hosted by the Alabama GOP, which counts as one of its most honored members the leader of the anti-amnesty caucus in the U.S. Senate. Say this for Jeb: When he promised not to pander to conservatives in the name of winning the primaries, he meant it. Imagine how well received he’ll be on “Morning Joe” after he flames out of the race and does the inevitable Huntsman-esque media tour to explain how right-wing radicals stole the party from pragmatists like him.

Bush 2016: Resolute for amnesty. There’s a banner worth carrying into the general election.

And he said that he believes President Obama’s executive actions to change immigration laws will be eventually ruled unconstitutional by federal courts. He reiterated that he backs “a path to earned legal status, not citizenship, but earned legal status. Where people get a provisional work permit, where they pay taxes, they pay a fine, they learn English, they work, they don’t receive federal government assistance and they — over extended period of time — they earn legal status.”

Bush said he welcomed the opportunity to explain his views on both subjects “because I find it interesting that people who share that view — rather than stick with the view and try to persuade people about it — in many cases have actually abandoned their views. I think the next president is going to have tougher times dealing with these issues than dealing with [Russian President Vladimir] Putin. If we’re going to bend with the wind, then it’ll be hard to imagine how we solve our problems.”

I wonder if that shot was aimed more at Rubio, whom many pros even in Florida now think will end up bypassing Jeb nationally, or at Scott Walker, whose immigration flip-flops (replete with name-checking Sessions) have been even more shameless than Rubio’s. If it’s the former, the bit about giving up on persuading people is unfair. That was the whole point of including Rubio in the Gang of Eight: Schumer et al. thought, not irrationally, that if there was anyone who could sell a comprehensive immigration bill to the GOP base, it was the young, smooth-talking, Latino superstar from the swing state whom tea partiers had sent to the Senate two years before. If Marco Rubio can’t make this happen, they figured, no one can. So Rubio tried, and not just in traditional pro-amnesty media outlets but in ones like conservative talk radio where he knew he’d take flak. And he did it knowing that if he failed to persuade righties, it might cost him his chance at the nomination in 2016. It’s a testament to his retail skill (and his confidence in that skill) that he was willing to accept a mission like that and able to extricate himself from it once he realized it was going nowhere such that he’s now still in the top tier of GOP contenders. In fact, even after having declared his candidacy, Rubio still takes care not to distance himself too much from the Gang of Eight bill. It’s not so much that he’s come to think it was a mistake, it’s that the votes simply aren’t there for it in the House. There’s no use continuing to try to persuade people, he argues, if a bipartisan campaign to pass the Gang of Eight bill two years ago went nowhere. Meanwhile, behind closed doors, he’s busy reminding GOP millionaires that he went to bat for them on amnesty, a wink-wink that he can be trusted to try again as president. Point being: It’s not so much that Rubio’s less willing than Jeb is to convince people to support amnesty, it’s that he’s smarter about when and where that persuasion should happen.

Also, since when is Jeb a model of unbending consistency on immigration reform? He supported a path to citizenship in 2012, then came out with a book in 2013 calling for a path to legal status but not citizenship (even though he knows that granting legal status to illegals will lead inexorably to citizenship), then said in an interview during the book tour that he’d support a path to citizenship if one could be devised that didn’t create an incentive for more illegal immigration. Wouldn’t a path to legal status create an incentive too? Rest assured, if he ends up as nominee and has to compete with Hillary for Latino voters, he’ll come up with a way to finesse his support for legal status so that a path to citizenship in some form also ends up on the table, especially once Democrats go after his plan as de facto “second-class status” for illegals. The smarter position — one now taken, not surprisingly, by Marco Rubio — is to avoid taking citizenship off the table while emphasizing that securing the border is an absolute prerequisite to legalization of any kind. If you fight this battle on the hill of “what rights should we grant to illegals?”, you’re fighting on Democratic turf. Fight it instead on “why can’t we secure our border as our first priority?” Why Jeb thinks he’s gaining some sort of advantage over Rubio, either in the primary or the general, by insisting on comprehensive reform instead of making a rhetorical move towards “security first” is baffling.


TOPICS: Florida; Campaign News; Issues; Parties
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; bush; immigration; squish; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
When even Allahpundit is dissing you, give it up. Go groom your son for office in Texas or something.
1 posted on 05/28/2015 7:00:11 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hard to bend more when you are flat over against the ground.


2 posted on 05/28/2015 7:01:15 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (an icon of resistance within the oppressed patriots, who represent resilience in the face of SSV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

No, he just blows consistently.


3 posted on 05/28/2015 7:01:37 PM PDT by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Was there ever a Bush that was a true conservative?


4 posted on 05/28/2015 7:02:03 PM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

Maybe in the 1700’s.


5 posted on 05/28/2015 7:02:34 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Jebster wants to give up the rule of law and the country to fraudulently documented foreigners.

Move yourself to Mexico instead of turning this country into North Mexico.


6 posted on 05/28/2015 7:04:51 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

Not the last two Bushes for sure.

First one took over a President which had got all but one state ad the in 4 years screwed it all up.
The second one gave us this mess and never fought back along with certain judges from both of them.


7 posted on 05/28/2015 7:06:12 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Our elected officials are supposed to bend to the will of the people.

Someone remind those elite dictators.


8 posted on 05/28/2015 7:08:56 PM PDT by donna (It is time for Americans to repent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Jeb Bush: Unlike certain Republican candidates, I don’t bend with the wind on immigration”

Correct, your tone deaf 24/7.


9 posted on 05/28/2015 7:16:20 PM PDT by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Blowhards don't bend, they continue to bloviate. Go home Jebbie, you will never be president.
10 posted on 05/28/2015 7:16:26 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Your right Jeb, you dont bend in the wind on this issue, you have always bent to the left and toward amnesty!

No thanks Jeb.

Cruz or lose.


11 posted on 05/28/2015 7:17:15 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, & R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Mexico is a place rich in beaury and resource. Lets just switch places. Conservatives can go there and they can come here. Then WE build a fence in New America and in 10 years, we can electrify the fence to stop Laraza from demanding the right to return after their slavery to white Democrat liberals is realized.


12 posted on 05/28/2015 7:24:06 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

True. He just bends over and takes it in his transero.


13 posted on 05/28/2015 7:25:46 PM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
He doesn't bend to the will of the people either.
14 posted on 05/28/2015 7:27:37 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Obama;America's Ambulance Chaser-In-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

I’d rather have Argentina or the Philippines.


15 posted on 05/28/2015 7:29:06 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

“Was there ever a Bush that was a true conservative?”

There were two of them that CLAIMED to be conservative that became president. The first one gave away his colors so bad that he lost re-election to an incredibly flawed candidate. The second one was barely elected (i.e., not trusted in the first place), then barely re-elected (i.e., proved that the doubters were right.

On the other hand, there was ONE Republican that claimed to be conservative and actually was. He won two landslides.

So which of the two approaches do practically every leader of the Republican Party and every Republican consultant (most of them gay, by the way) ‘claim’ will win? It certainly ain’t the second.


16 posted on 05/28/2015 7:29:36 PM PDT by BobL (REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win (see my 'about' page))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Jeb should make like the wind and blow!


17 posted on 05/28/2015 7:29:40 PM PDT by Mr. Peabody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Arg fine but Phil is too smart to take us up on the offer.


18 posted on 05/28/2015 7:31:33 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

We’d have PI looking like Singapore or the ROK in 15 years.


19 posted on 05/28/2015 7:32:52 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yes, Jeb, that’s nice.

But unlike some other Robin Hoods, I can speak with an English accent.


20 posted on 05/28/2015 7:36:32 PM PDT by MarkRegal05
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson