Posted on 12/16/2014 11:02:24 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
The National Review reports:
To hell with the independents. That’s not usually the animating principle of a presidential campaign, but for Ted Cruz’s, it just might be.
His strategists aren’t planning to make a big play for so-called independent voters in the general election if Cruz wins the Republican nomination. Several of the senator’s top advisers said that Cruz sees a path to victory that relies instead on increasing conservative turnout, trying to attract votes from groups that have tended to favor Democrats (Jews, Hispanics and millennials), and, in the words of one Cruz strategist, “not getting killed with independents.”
Either Cruz is not as smart as some people say, or he has decided to give up on being a serious national Republican in favor of becoming the next Sarah Palin. I’m with Henry Olsen — and others who can do math — who is quoted as saying this is a “fantasy.” (“The Republican base, he says, simply isn’t large enough to win an election nationally, and the Republican nominee must ‘energize establishment Republicans and people who don’t call themselves conservatives.’ “)
In 2012 and 2008, Republicans were 32 percent of the general electorate. In George Bush’s reelection in 2004, that number got as high as 37 percent. In 1980, Cruz’s hero Ronald Reagan won with only 28 percent of the electorate identifying as Republicans because he got 56 percent of independents — Cruz doesn’t want any of them, I guess — and 27 percent of Democrats. Cruz, or any Republican, has zero chance of becoming president without votes of non-Republicans. Cruz’s hero shouldn’t be Reagan but Barry Goldwater....
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Who would pay any attention to this witch?
Well let's find out, Rubin...!
Actually, if you take the 22 who voted w Ted this weekend and you add 7 of the 9 the new GOP Senators, you will find that total is 29 of 54 GOP Senators to be seated in January.
That would be “The majority of the majority”.
Jennifer’s pretty ignorant. The PJ Media article on “Catalist” from a few months back clearly shows that Obama won in 2012 by ditching indies and focusing on driving up his base turnout. It was both cheaper and more effective than moving towards the center.
Another clueless self-proclaimed conservative.
Or Eisenhower, Nixon and both Bush’s. While those men weren’t as conservative as Reagan, by any means, they were portrayed that way in the press, which means most voters assumed they were.
I hope he goes third party. I dont want any part of the establishment. He is the best man for the country. The republican socialists screw the conservatives in primaries that are “winner take all” designed to pop out some socialist like romney with 22% of the vote while the idiot conservative fight it out with 6 candidates. ITS RIGGED!!I dont want to play any more!
The tactic is to inflame the base to motivate them to vote.
Jennifer Rubin is the house “conservative” at the Washington Post, their equivalent (and just as phony) as David Brooks of the NY Times. They put these phonies out to make it appear that they are balanced; far, far less so than Fox News.
This is the Palinization of Cruz. That means I am being Palinized. The republicans lost me last weekend.
The Palinization of Ted Cruz picks up furious pace by the seig-heiling sycophants of the Ruling Class.
Does anyone still not understand that these ‘Republicans” are simply Democrats that have infiltrated the party and the leadership?
We now have a Roman Senate that just funded Caesar.
The Republic is no more.
Does she have anything to write about besides telling us how powerless TC is... lol
She is an obvious fake.
Is Elizabeth “Fauxcahontas” Warren the horse that was made a senator?
I don't think that's true (in fact has been disproved often, e.g., Reagan), and if the assumption is not true, then Rubin's whole argument falls apart.
If Ted Cruz doesn't become president, it won't be because of independents, it'll be because of the GOPe.
And the National Review article she references gives both the Obama 2012 campaign and the Bush 2004 campaign as examples of campaigns that won by appealing to the base rather than moving to the middle. Apparently she forgot those 2 examples - either that or she didn’t read the article.
You noticed that, too? She has stepped-up her column output, it seems, and EVERY ONE that I can find is about how Ted Cruz is already dead-in-the-water, everyone hates him, his poll numbers suck and his halitosis is driving the capitol building mad.
Let them speculate all they want. It proves nothing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.