Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives that can't vote for Romney VANITY

Posted on 11/02/2012 11:06:00 AM PDT by birdsman

I know that some freepers are reluctant to vote for Romney because he's not conservative enough. Few of us wanted him to be the Republican nominee, and for good reason. This is why I'm voting Libertarian this year. I know the mantra, a vote for Gary Johnson is a vote for Obama, but that's not true in deep blue states like mine (New York). I propose that conservatives in deep blue states agree to vote 3rd party. In return, conservatives in toss up states can hold their noses while voting for Romney.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: obama; obamabot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-152 next last
To: Domandred

“However we DO NOT want a nightmare scenario where Obama gets the popular vote”

A single vote never matters, since no race will ever be decided by a one-vote margin. It doesn’t matter in a “battleground” state, much less in a deep blue state, and less of all for the popular vote. It’s incomprehensible to me why you’d even bother with the popular argument. If his vote is a drop in Superior in New York it’s a drop in the Atlantic nationally.


101 posted on 11/02/2012 11:56:30 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeChris

Well said. Indeed.


102 posted on 11/02/2012 11:57:12 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts ("The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left." Ecclesiastes 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeChris
we CAN NOT afford to lose this election

Right! The incumbent is the first President who actually hates every thing that traditional Americans believe in. (Who else could have sat in a pew for 20 years, while his Pastor "damned" America?)

William Flax [Romney/Ryan]

103 posted on 11/02/2012 11:58:28 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: birdsman
Do you seriously think GARY JOHNSON would make a better President than Romney? GARY JOHNSON?! Are you kidding me? Whatever you are smoking, I'm sure it's illegal but part of Johnson's platform. Seriously, there are TWO choices in this election. TWO. Grow up and deal with it. We need EVERY vote we can for ROMNEY, not some guy who could hold his nominating convention in a phone booth. Even if you don't think Romney has a chance in New York, we need as a convicing national win over Obama as possible to give Romney as big of a mandate as possible, and to repudiate Obozo as much as possible.

Don't be "cute" and piss your vote away. Make it count. For all you know New York could be in play. Or New Jersey. Or any other state for that matter.

As conservatives we had our chance to get as conservative of a nominee as possible. We didn't get someone as conservative as we would have liked to oppose Obama, but Romney is what we have. Next time fight harder for someone more conservative if that's what you really want. But this time around it's ROMNEY or OBAMA.

Now go grow a pair and pick one.
104 posted on 11/02/2012 11:59:44 AM PDT by GLDNGUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: birdsman

I voted early for Goode (Constitution Party). Just changed my tagline to indicate that. But Romney will win my state easily.


105 posted on 11/02/2012 12:00:04 PM PDT by Sloth (Rather than a lesser Evil, I voted for Goode.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Sorry, I believe it’s simpler than that ~ religious freedom grows out of the barrel of a gun ~ that’s what my Huguenot ancestors believed and today modern Catholics agree with that doctrine.


106 posted on 11/02/2012 12:00:15 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: birdsman

Look, I used to despise Romney too, and thought that maybe just for cathartic purposes or something, kind of like a medieval bloodletting for health, we should reelect O. But that would be confirmation of O’s socialist pro-gay pro-illegal policies, all for a small brownie point that conservatives stuck to their purity and didn’t deign to vote for RR.

A couple things have changed in my view of Romney. One, his debate #1 performance, I thought it was unabashed conservative. I really didn’t see any waffling toward the middle, as MSNBC tried to portray.

And on the key issue of immigration, in debate 2, though RR has been low key on the issue, he confirmed that he isn’t going to do amnesty, and ROMNEY IS GOING TO INSTITUTE E-VERIFY! That will be critical to stemming illegal immigration and the illegals to leave, and O is not going to do it, and sop with O the next thing we know the electorate will be overwhelmed by illegals that vote Dem & socialist.

No, conservatives, vote Romney, not Obama.


107 posted on 11/02/2012 12:03:44 PM PDT by Hokestuk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Digital logic...are you a computer guy?


108 posted on 11/02/2012 12:07:19 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
I hate Liberaltarians.

Back in the nineties I used to self-identify as a Libertarian. That was until I attended some meetings and found out that the party is really all about legalizing pot. It was the only issue anyone was passionate about. So I left and never looked back. Some friends of mine still on the "inside" tell me that nowadays they are all in the tank for Gay Marriage, too. How nice.

109 posted on 11/02/2012 12:10:12 PM PDT by jboot (This isn't your father's America. Stay safe and keep your powder dry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: birdsman

bird, by the time this thread is over ... your vote will be the most important vote in America ... the entire country lobbying birdman for his vote on the NYS electors.

Good job, buddy! What about my vote!!

Do I vote for Linda McMahon?
Do I put my Linda McMahon yard sign up? If I do not, is it immoral?
Do I hafta campaign for Linda, too? ( I need a philosopher today)


110 posted on 11/02/2012 12:12:21 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (campaigning for local conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Oberon
and except for the rhetoric nothing much will change.

If there are not massive TEA Party rallies between a Romney victory and Jan 20th, and beyond, then the only people to blame for no change will be ourselves.

Romeny will govern to the right of center, IF, we, through Congress and out raised voices, continually remind him why he was elected, and by whom.

111 posted on 11/02/2012 12:13:40 PM PDT by Turbo Pig (...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Oberon

re: “I’m done voting for evil.”

The problem with this is that all of us are evil and sinners. No candidate is going to be all that we want. No candidate, aside from Jesus, and He isn’t on the ticket, is going to be free from evil.

The truth is you are ALWAYS voting for the man/woman who represents LESS EVIL. The candidates you like have the least evil (as far as you perceive it) as opposed to the ones who appear to have the MOST evil.

You are either voting for less evil or more evil - there are no other choices.

Look at it this way - you have to decide which candidate represents more of what you support, and, vote against the candidate who represents the least of what you support.

If Candidate A is 50% of what you want, and Candidate B is 40% of what you want - which one do you vote for?

Now, of course you will say, “What about Candidate C?” He/she is 90% of what you want but has a snowballs chance in Hades to be elected.

If you vote your “conscience”, you feel good because you voted for the one you thought was best, yet the kicker is, you divided the opposition against the WORST candidate, thus, helping the WORST one to win.

It’s simple math. It is absolutely certain that dividing the vote helps one of two main party candidates - not the third party candidate.

If you want better main party candidates, you have to get involved in that party - i.e. join the party, attend local precinct meetings, volunteer for stuff, help in campaigns, etc. In other words, the more involved you are in the day to day workings of your local party, the more you can influence which candidates make it to the top tier for consideration.

If all you do is wait for “other” people in the party to choose who the candidates will be, but you’ve had no involvment and therefore no influence - why be surprised that you always wind up with having to choose among candidates you don’t like very much. Involvment is the key to influencing local, state, and ultimately national candidates.

But, as I said, you will always be choosing between the lesser of two, or three, or four evils. But, the worst candidate is usually the one who benefits the most from dividing the opposition against him.

So, Oberon - choose to vote for LESS evil. Yes, it stinks but that’s just the way it is.


112 posted on 11/02/2012 12:16:09 PM PDT by rusty schucklefurd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: All
I'm voting for the hopeful implosion of MSNBC and anything that helps utterly destroy the credibility of the MSM, which I believe is as big of a threat to the nation as obama.

I think we should also consider that even in a solid blue state, a vote counts towards the popular vote. The closer the popular vote, the more they will attempt to contest the electoral vote imho.

The closer the popular vote, the more the MSM can claim that their messiah actually won.

I pray for an election that damages the MSM.
113 posted on 11/02/2012 12:24:08 PM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

“Digital logic...are you a computer guy?”

I’m a common sense guy, trying to explain it in a way that can reach people.


114 posted on 11/02/2012 12:26:38 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares ( Refusing to kneel before the "messiah".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144
For the first time since 1976 I will pass on the top of the ticket. I will go vote down ticket though.

It is the second time for me - The first being when I was too sick to get to the polls and missed voting all together...

I am thinking I will write in Tom Hoefling (FR's EternalVigilance), even though I don't think it is a valid write-in in MT.

115 posted on 11/02/2012 12:26:45 PM PDT by roamer_1 (Globalism is just socialism in a business suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

yer vote is trivial civic nonsense.

someday, get somebody elected by actually campaigning for him.


116 posted on 11/02/2012 12:28:20 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (campaigning for local conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Is Johnson’s running well enough in NM to tip that state to Obama, or is the state just locked up for Obama any way?
Locked? Like Carter over Reagan in 1980?
117 posted on 11/02/2012 12:28:59 PM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Oberon

“Yes. And voting for either of the two leading candidates is a vote for the status quo.”

I’m sorry, but this is politically moronic.
SCOTUS appointees alone from Obama should make your soul shudder.

Romney was far from my first choice, but he is oceans away from being a neo-socialist and statist like Obozo.

I’m not here to argue it, it’s beyond obvious if you can’t see it then god, devil or sun help you. I will never forgive or forget those that abandon our nation in it’s deepest moment of need to correct course. Never.


118 posted on 11/02/2012 12:29:59 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares ( Refusing to kneel before the "messiah".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: birdsman

I respect your decision. This is the last nose holder for me.


119 posted on 11/02/2012 12:30:18 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Exactly, he is the classic so called fiscal conservative which he isn’t and a social liberal. Only wimps follow that semi-conservative mantra so they aren’t stuck standing up for the killing of babies.

How can you have a fiscal program when you believe anything goes? More atheistic communism for everybody but balance the budget, right.

Pray for America


120 posted on 11/02/2012 12:32:25 PM PDT by bray (Nov 6, tell Obama to Stand Down!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: birdsman

Gary Johnson is an open borders/free trader and Virgil Goode was a Democrat. They both have warts as large as Romney’s.


121 posted on 11/02/2012 12:35:01 PM PDT by Alaska Wolf (Trained by English Setters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
I voted early for Goode (Constitution Party). Just changed my tagline to indicate that.

Facilitating an Obama victory by denying his only viable opponent a vote is tantamount to deliberately supporting the "greater evil" over the "lesser evil".

How is it "goode" to assist in the triumph of the "greater evil"? How is it logical?

122 posted on 11/02/2012 12:35:20 PM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Any so called conservative that refuses to vote for Romney, after what happened in Libya, is someone I will never forgive. If Obama wins, they will be responsible for anything he does to this country.

Romney was not my first, or even second choice, but I don’t believe he would have sat around and let these people die.


123 posted on 11/02/2012 12:35:29 PM PDT by beandog (All Aboard the Choo Choo Train to Crazy Town)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Nifster
When Romney wins it will be up to US to hold his feet to the fire


124 posted on 11/02/2012 12:38:00 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

The last poll I saw here in NM Johnson was pulling 6% of the vote. I would love to see Romney win here but it is not looking good but anything can happen.

I think Johnson will hurt zero in Colorado. The state has the legalization of pot on the ballot so he should get the stoner vote and that hurts zero.


125 posted on 11/02/2012 12:43:58 PM PDT by MAKOTHEDOG (LANDSLIDE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: everyone

Is one reason to VOTE him OUT by VOTING for Romney/Ryan.

Please Support Free Republic Today!

126 posted on 11/02/2012 12:44:33 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
Vote for Obama then. I'm fed up with people who are too damn holier-than-thou to vote for Romney. It may suck but there is no alternative short of total marxism with "more flexibility" than ever before!

You clearly don't like mormons, but do you like phaux-christian semi-muslim marxist atheist MORONS any better? Such as Obama?

127 posted on 11/02/2012 12:48:20 PM PDT by Wyrd bi ful ard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Hokestuk

ROMNEY IS GOING TO INSTITUTE E-VERIFY!
__________________________________________

Willard got his finger in the air again, has he ???

Well hes a few years too late...

We already have E-Verify...

Next...


128 posted on 11/02/2012 12:51:29 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: TommyC1
Vote and vote Romney/Ryan. Remember, they can’t cheat if we win big.

Not only that but a major landslide against the marxists/one world order types will let them know that a large majority of Americans have no interest in their utopian fantasies.

129 posted on 11/02/2012 12:52:18 PM PDT by oldbrowser (Shellac Barac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: birdsman

THIS is not the PRIMARY.....vote for Libertarian in the General is a VOTE FOR OBAMA...whether you like it or not....that’s the result. WORK within the GOP to CHANGE them...that’s what hundreds of thousands of us are doing....not going to shoot ourselves in the foot just because we don’t have the “PERFECT” candidate.


130 posted on 11/02/2012 12:54:16 PM PDT by goodnesswins (What has happened to America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: birdsman
This sounds good on the surface, but NO, DON'T DO IT!!! Don't go 3rd party, even in a solid Dem state.

Here's why: For Romney to score a clean win, he's got to win both the Electoral College AND the popular vote.

Now suppose Romney wins the EC, but loses the popular vote by a sliver, say 50,000 votes. Sure, he'd be president, but he'd be dogged by the popular vote loss. It would be a stone around his neck that he just doesn't need.

Beyond that, there would probably be riots over the popular vote winner (Obama in this scenario) being “denied” his victory.

131 posted on 11/02/2012 12:55:14 PM PDT by Leaning Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: birdsman

AND, furthermore, I’m in a so called “BLUE” state that is starting to lean RED....nothing is guaranteed this time around.


132 posted on 11/02/2012 12:56:15 PM PDT by goodnesswins (What has happened to America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: beandog

If Obama wins, they will be responsible for anything he does to this country.

I feel that way about anybody (especially Republicans) who voted for him in 2008. I can’t believe people would buy into his BS and it is not the media’s fault for not vetting him in 2008 and again in 2012. It was plain to anybody who just spent a little time doing some research who this Marxist was and is. I could tolerate these people’s votes for zero the first but I really had a hard time with it since then. I would rather not know how they voted just make it right this time.

I have faith that Romney will do what he says and reverse the last 4 years and that is all you really have with any challenger.

He wasn’t my first choice either. If I am nervous at all it is the prospect of another 4 years of zero.


133 posted on 11/02/2012 1:14:32 PM PDT by MAKOTHEDOG (LANDSLIDE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Best Romney doesn’t believe he has the Mandate of Heaven ~


134 posted on 11/02/2012 1:52:12 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
What you are doing with this incessant nonsense about a vote for not-romney is a vote for 'bama is you are convincing people to not vote at all ~ ever!

As long as they don't vote for 'bama then 'bama doesn't get a vote.

There are plenty of people elsewhere on the ballot deserving of Conservative or LIbertarian or Vegan votes ~ let these people vote for them! Else, next time you need a vote somewhere, or imagine you do, they won't be there for you at all.

135 posted on 11/02/2012 1:54:56 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: MAKOTHEDOG
You sure got that backwards. The stoners will vote for the Democrats before they'll vote for any Republican ~ ever!

Just what were you smoking that made you imagine stoners vote Republican? ROTFLMAO!!!

136 posted on 11/02/2012 1:59:45 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Gary Johnson openly supports the legalization of pot. Johnson left the Republican party for the Libertarian party so that might be part of the deal. I am not smoking anything. The last picture I have seen of this cat showed him in a tee shirt with the stupid peace symbol on it. Of course he was wearing a blazer.


137 posted on 11/02/2012 2:17:03 PM PDT by MAKOTHEDOG (LANDSLIDE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: MAKOTHEDOG

So do hispanic voters ~ they know the Democrats will someday deliver the goods. The ‘lawn order’ Republicans won’t.


138 posted on 11/02/2012 2:23:23 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: birdsman

Knock it off...Vote for Romney

I live in the deepest of the Blue States - MA - I’m voting for Romney...and I don’t even like him :)

(Thank goodness there’s no strong “Perot” in this race)


139 posted on 11/02/2012 2:39:24 PM PDT by libertarian27 (Check my profile page for the FReeper Online Cookbook 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

Those who bitch and moan and no effort to hold their elective representatives accountable have no one else to blame. Laugh if you want. But I think that people are finally ready (at least a good majority of them) to act like grown ups and take their country back.


140 posted on 11/02/2012 3:17:04 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: birdsman

Sounds like a reasonable idea in a way. I live in Kal-i-fornia and my vote is meaningless. I might have to consider what it means to vote for a 3rd party though. Maybe I should vote for Roseanne Barr, or Mickey Mouse instead.


141 posted on 11/02/2012 4:06:26 PM PDT by Liberty4California (Free California from the Leftists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: birdsman

We are not only voting against Barack Obama, but we are also voting against Eric Holder, Kathleen Sebelius, Janet Napalitano, Hillary Clinton and her apparently soon to come replacement John “I was in VietNam” Kerry, Valerie Jarrett and the rest of the Obama Chicago Thug Machine.

Think about it.


142 posted on 11/02/2012 6:41:56 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Don't be afraid to see what you see. -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: all the best
Back in January I said there was not a dime’s worth of difference between Obama and Mitt. Today I am holding on to that 9cents as our only hope.

0bama's ineptitude, crass political opportunism, and utter void where his patriotism should be led to the bloody murder of four good Americans in Benghazi.

I don't see R0mney throwing our men to the wolves like that.

FWIW.

143 posted on 11/02/2012 6:48:05 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

“A single vote never matters, since no race will ever be decided by a one-vote margin.”

You act just like obama by laying out a fake strawman argument then attempting to draw conclusions off of that. Garbage in, garbage out!!

JC


144 posted on 11/03/2012 3:25:16 AM PDT by cracker45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

NM is full of Indians dependent on welfare, social programs and food stamps. Whomever promises to provide more of the same gets the votes...

JC


145 posted on 11/03/2012 3:36:37 AM PDT by cracker45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: birdsman
Well, I'm in Deep Blue California and four Votes for Romney / Ryan were cast in my household.

Since I believe in Miracles, I refuse to give in to the CA Democrats (Communists) and the Obama Regime (Communists)without a fight. Lots of other people and issues on the Ballot that needed our support as well.

146 posted on 11/03/2012 3:48:21 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (How do you insult an Obama Voter? Call them an Obama Voter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: birdsman
Oh yeah, one other thing.

Exactly what do you think will be accomplished with your Grand Bargain? This question is coming from a 1992 Perot Voter, so I know what can happen when a Third, Fourth or Fifth Party Candidate robs Votes from the Republican.

To this day I regret my Political ignorance of 20 years ago.

147 posted on 11/03/2012 3:53:39 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (How do you insult an Obama Voter? Call them an Obama Voter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cracker45
NM is full of Indians dependent on welfare, social programs and food stamps. Whomever promises to provide more of the same gets the votes...
That's been the Liberal game plan for the last 40 years.
With the Takers of America now around 47% (yes, that 47%), we are at a crucial tipping point.
Tuesday's election will decide which way the arrow points - freedom or slavery.
148 posted on 11/03/2012 5:30:07 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: birdsman
I know the mantra, a vote for Gary Johnson is a vote for Obama

How about, a vote for Gary Johnson is a vote that shows you are incapable of simple reasoning or math. People vote for Gary Johnson for one of two reasons, a big pumped up ego that thinks you are better than everyone else and won't soil yourself in the trenches getting rid of Obama, or two, you like pot.

149 posted on 11/03/2012 7:54:33 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: birdsman
Ok,maybe I am wrong here but what about the states that have passed the “popular vote” laws?Even if Romney doesn't win enough to get to 279,but wins the popular vote,there are 8 states that have passed laws to give their EC votes to the popular vote winner.Wouldn't that burn them up,because the states that have passed it are Maryland,New Jersey,Illinois.Hawaii,California,Vermont,Washington,Massachusetts,and Washington DC.I realize this isn't techincally legally legal without being authorized by congress but it would be interesting to see what they would do.They have passed the laws,but they intended them to be used for the benefit of the dimocraps!
150 posted on 11/03/2012 4:36:06 PM PDT by makersmk2013
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson