[CaptRon]

My argument is flawed because the current Energy Secretary is incompetent?! And I'm ignorant? Did you log on under a different name? I just had this discussion with another jerk.

She is unelectable. She is the prom queen and will always be viewed as that no matter what you want to think.

[SmokingJoe]

“She is unelectable”,/i>

/sarc Yeah. Unelectable like Scott Brown was “unelectable” in Massachusetts, only 3 weeks before the elections..according to all the “experts”.

” She is the prom queen and will always be viewed as that no matter what you want to think”,/i>

Show me a prom queen that has been governor of the biggest state in the country, and had approval ratings of over 90% when she was governor.
Meanwhile, get back to me when you develop a brain will ya?

[grey_whiskers]

I think what our good captain is trying to say to you is this:

Cheers!

[unseen1]

a prom queen? ROFL.

If you worked to get the GOP elected it is no wonder we lost the House, the Senate and the Whitehouse.

You argument is Flawed because there is no sec of energy that has every got 8,000 people to attend a campaign event like Palin did in TX this weekend. People that get 8,000 people to attend an event do not settle for Sec of energy. That would be like Bradshaw playing for an arena football league team.

She has been elected to many offices both local and state. So she is anything but unelectable. she has a PROVEN track record of being electable.

Your argument is flawed because you state that she will not win the coasts and thus is unelectable. That is flawed because you do not need to win any of the coast and still win the election or did you miss 2000 and 2004?

a prom queen? seriously the best you could come up with is a sexist remark when faced with the reality of the Electoral votes needed to win an election?

that's all you got?

ROFLMAO