Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big Labor's Top Ten Special Privileges
National Right to Work ^ | February 28, 2002 | NRTW Staff

Posted on 02/28/2002 10:39:16 AM PST by flim-flam

Big Labor’s Top Ten Special Privileges

     Labor union officials enjoy many extraordinary powers and immunities that were created by legislatures and the courts. Union officials claim to rely on the support of rank-and-file workers. Yet, they clamor in the political arena to secure and expand their government-granted powers, including the powers to shake down workers for financial support and even to wage campaigns of violent retaliation against non-union employees.

     The following list of special privileges reveals the extent to which union bosses have rigged our nation’s labor laws in their favor.

Privilege #1: Exemption from prosecution for union violence.

The most egregious example of organized labor’s special privileges and immunities is the 1973 United States v. Enmons decision. In it, the United States Supreme Court held that union violence is exempted from the Hobbs Act, which makes it a federal crime to obstruct interstate commerce by robbery or extortion. As a result, thousands of incidents of violent assaults (directed mostly against workers) by union militants have gone unpunished. Meanwhile, many states also restrict the authority of law enforcement to enforce laws during strikes.

Privilege #2: Exemption from anti-monopoly laws.

The Clayton Act of 1914 exempts unions from anti-monopoly laws, enabling union officials to forcibly drive out independent or alternative employee bargaining groups.

Privilege #3: Power to force employees to accept unwanted union representation.

Monopoly bargaining, or “exclusive representation,” which is embedded in most of the country’s labor relations statutes, enables union officials to act as the exclusive bargaining agents of all employees at a unionized workplace, thereby depriving employees of the right to make their own employment contracts. For example, the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) of 1935, the Federal Labor Relations Act (FLRA) of 1978, and the Railway Labor Act (RLA) of 1926 prohibit employees from negotiating their own contracts with their employers or choosing their own workplace representatives.

Privilege #4: Power to collect forced union dues.

Unlike other private organizations, unions can compel individuals to support them financially. In 28 states under the NLRA (those that have not passed Right to Work laws), all states under the RLA, on “exclusive federal enclaves,” and in many states under public sector labor relations acts, employees may be forced to pay union dues as a condition of employment, even if they reject union affiliation.

Privilege #5: Unlimited, undisclosed electioneering.

The Federal Election Campaign Act exempts unions from its limits on campaign contributions and expenditures, as well as some of its reporting requirements. Union bigwigs can spend unlimited amounts on communications to members and their families in support of, or opposition to, candidates for federal office, and they need not report these expenditures if they successfully claim that union publications are primarily devoted to other subjects. For years, the politically active National Education Association (NEA) teacher union has gotten away with claiming zero political expenditures on its IRS tax forms!

Privilege #6: Ability to strong-arm employers into negotiations.

Unlike all other parties in the economic marketplace, union officials can compel employers to bargain with them. The NLRA, FLRA, and RLA make it illegal for employers to resist a union’s collective bargaining efforts and difficult for them to counter aggressive and deceptive campaigns waged by union organizers.

Privilege #7: Right to trespass on an employer’s private property.

The Norris-LaGuardia Act of 1932 (and state anti-injunction acts) give union activists immunity from injunctions against trespass on an employer’s property.

Privilege #8: Ability of strikers to keep jobs despite refusing to work.

Unlike other employees, unionized employees in the private sector have the right to strike; that is, to refuse to work while keeping their job. In some cases, it is illegal for employers to hire replacement workers, even to avert bankruptcy. Meanwhile, union officials demonize replacement workers as “scabs” to set them up for retaliation.

Privilege #9: Union-only cartels on construction projects.

Under so-called project labor agreements, governments (local, state, or federal) award contracts for construction on major projects such as highways, airports, and stadiums exclusively to unionized firms. Such practices effectively lock-out qualified contractors and employees who refuse to submit to exclusive union bargaining, forced union dues, and wasteful union work rules. So far, just three states have outlawed these discriminatory and costly union-only pacts.

Privilege #10: Government funding of forced unionism.

On top of all of the special powers and immunities granted to organized labor, politicians even pour taxpayer money straight into union coffers. Union groups receive upwards of $160 million annually in direct federal grants. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg. In 2001, the federal Department of Labor doled out $148 million for “international labor programs” overwhelmingly controlled by an AFL-CIO front group. Federal bureaucrats spend approximately $2.6 billion per year on “job training programs” that, under the Workforce Investment Act, must be administered by boards filled with union officials. Union bosses also benefit from a plethora of state and local government giveaways.

 

 



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Nothing really new to report other than a terrific summary of organized labor's power grabs. It also illustrates why labor law, in regards to unions, is badly in need of an overhaul.
1 posted on 02/28/2002 10:39:17 AM PST by flim-flam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: flim-flam
This is why America loses manafacturing jobs not NAFTA you Buchanianites.
2 posted on 02/28/2002 10:47:28 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flim-flam
If you have a ping list can you put me on it.
3 posted on 02/28/2002 10:48:11 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flim-flam
Bump.
4 posted on 02/28/2002 11:44:09 AM PST by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flim-flam
Thanks...
"1973 United States v. Enmons decision. In it, the United States Supreme Court held that union violence is exempted from the Hobbs Act, "

I can never remember that...
I'm bookmarking this one!

5 posted on 02/28/2002 1:30:24 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flim-flam
The NLRA, FLRA, and RLA make it illegal for employers to resist a union's collective bargaining efforts and difficult for them to counter aggressive and deceptive campaigns waged by union organizers.

"difficult"? employers can have mandatory paid propaganda meetings for their own deceptive campaings. thats a huge weapon!

6 posted on 02/28/2002 1:32:11 PM PST by gfactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gfactor
The conclusion I have come to is compulsory unionism is a coercive system of social engineering. Furthermore, it serves as a breeding ground for corruption. What's needed is an accountable system which respects free association and freedom of contract. This will benefit both employers and employees. The union will actually have to offer something all interested parties want.
7 posted on 02/28/2002 1:53:09 PM PST by flim-flam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gfactor
When I have a buisness Im Union busting by any means neccasary the law be damned.
8 posted on 03/01/2002 4:20:08 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: weikel
When I have a buisness Im Union busting by any means neccasary the law be damned.

in america, as opposed to other industrial countries, there are plenty of legal means, as well as law firms that specialize in union busting. i guess the best thing to say is to not come crying foul to a law-abiding conservative website when your "the law be damned" civil disobedience gets you in trouble.

9 posted on 03/01/2002 10:01:43 AM PST by gfactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gfactor
Well legal means come 1st then after that....
10 posted on 03/01/2002 11:13:44 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: flim-flam
Excellent list. National Right To Work organization is one that should be supported by all who care about freedom!
11 posted on 03/01/2002 11:18:27 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weikel
I have always maintained that the need for organized labor unions in this country is long past. They should be outlawed for a period of no less than 10


12 posted on 03/01/2002 11:24:53 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
They should be legal but they should not have any special rights employers should be able to fire striking workers for example.
13 posted on 03/01/2002 11:32:30 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
Agreed! I am a supporter myself. Like Free Republic, your support gets a lot of bang for the buck.
14 posted on 03/01/2002 11:41:10 AM PST by flim-flam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson