Paul plans D.C. detour to vote against debt increase

Washington Times ^ | 17 January 2012 | By Stephen Dinan

[JakeS]

Newt, as a member of C0ngress voted for increases, Rick as a member of the Senate voted for increases, the only candidate who has never voted for an increase in the debt limit is Congressman Ron Paul.

Why are so many so afraid that the man who has never voted to fund abortion, never done and abortion, never voted for a debt ceiling increase, never stopped yelling about the corrupt federal reserve, has consistently fought against presidents being able to go to war without a vote from Congress, etc, being the Republican nominee?

[ElkGroveDan]

the only candidate who has never voted for an increase in the debt limit is Congressman Ron Paul.

Good point. Too bad he's that he's insane.

[Responsibility2nd]

There is no other member of Congress who has supported and benefitted from pork spending and earmarks than L. Ron Paul.

The man is a FRAUD.

He consistently votes down these tax and spend bills, but his fingerprints are still everywhere.

Oh, BTW. IBTZ.

[Daveinyork]

Because he sounds like he has warped perceptions of foreign policy. I’d take his domestic policy suggestions any day over the rest, and if whoever is our next president does not institute his domestic policies, we will never be able to afford any sort of effective foreign policy.

(I take a lot of heat, and get called a Paulbot for defending his economic and domstice policies on this board.)

[jpsb]

This vote is largely symbolic since the GOP controlled house has already given Obama the debt ceiling increase. But it does serve to illustrate the differences between Paul and the other GOP candidates.

[don-o]

Why are so many so afraid

Because his Happy Meal is short an order of fries

[cripplecreek]

Yeah I wasn’t even looking for him on the open secrets website but was surprised at how often he turned up while researching other stuff.

[WOBBLY BOB]

Lawmakers Proposed $1 Trillion In New Spending Last Year

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2833967/posts

this will destroy us sooner and more thoroughly than Iran's aspirations.

[swampfox101]

I think most conservaties agree with those things but they don’t feel comfortable with his “Blame Amerian First” foreign policy stance.

He sees the murder of over 3,000 people on 9/11 as an act of terrorism and not an act of war. Our country was clearly attacked by radical Islamist, We can either fight or surrender, Paul chose surrender and the white flag. Most conservatives find that disgusting.

[Sudetenland]

"Why are so many so afraid that the man who has never voted to fund abortion, . . . etc, being the Republican nominee?"

Because he is nuts. If you haven't figured that out after last nights comedic performance, then you are one seriously clueless Paulbot. "Why didn't we just capture bin Laden?" I mean REALLY? How about because he picked up an AK when the SEALS entered the room. The man's an idiot--the worst joke I have ever seen in a politician.

[Responsibility2nd]

If RoPaul gives a damn about cutting the budget, then why this....

 

 

Paul Flies Luxe on Your Dime [ron paul is a 2-faced self-dealing racist GOOFUS]
NY Post ^ | 1/16/2012 | staff

Posted on Tuesday, January 17, 2012 5:03:58 PM by Notwithstanding

Texas Rep. Ron Paul, who’s made his crusade to slash federal spending the cornerstone of his GOP presidential run, has been habitually flying first class at taxpayer expense.

Paul has jetted first class on at least 31 round-trip flights and 12 one-way flights since May 2009 to travel between Washington and his Texas district, according to an Associated Press review of congressional office expenses.

Another four round-trip tickets and two one-way tickets were eligible for upgrades to first class. The records did not reveal if the upgrade was made.

Paul’s first-class flights on Continental Airlines cost taxpayers nearly $52,000 since 2009 — or about $27,000 more than flying coach.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...

 

 

 

As I've said. The man is a FRAUD.

[Sudetenland]

It doesn't show that he is anything other than a grand stander. "Look at me! Look at me! Aren't I wonderful? I'm running back to the House to cast another meaningless vote so everyone can see how wonderful I am."

Paul is one pathetic joke and he always has been.

[jpsb]

"It doesn't show that he is anything other than a grand stander."

Well I guess if you are Ok, with being 15.3 trillion in debt and having to borrow 43 cents of every federal dollar spent then yeah, I can see why you would not want a congressman who is against out of control spending to vote. Enjoy the debt.

[jpsb]

Ron Paul returns over $140,000 from his office budget to the U.S. Treasury
by W.E. Messamore
April 2, 2011

Last year, we took notice when Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) returned $100,000 of his Congressional office budget to the United States Treasury.

[svcw]

This is the actual headline: Paul plans D.C. detour to vote against debt increase

You should change it.

[svcw]

So what. He loads up the bills with earmarks, then votes against any bill he knows will pass. The guy is a fraud.

[Sudetenland]

Your strawman comment is as meaningless and irrelevant as [w]Ron[g] Paul's vote, Paulbot. He's doing this vote just as everything else he has done throughout his useless career in Congress, as a meaningless grandstanding play.

The clown is a complete fraud and you bots don't even realize you're being played. Down here in Texas we all know about Paul and he is a joke.

[jpsb]

funny WE here in his district IN TEXAS keep electing him to Congress. So far all you have done is stamp your feet scream, yell and insult. Like I said enjoy the 15.3 trillion in debt that only Paul and a handful of congressmen seem to be fighting against.

[darkwing104]

Dear Paultard,

Why don't you practice what you preach and give the taxpayers back some of the loot your elected loon got for your district.

"As for earmarks, the congressman requested at least $157 million for fiscal year 2011, and another $398 million for fiscal year 2010, according to his congressional Web site. The provisions included $2.5 million for a “Historic Downtown Redevelopment Project” in Baytown, Texas; $8 million for replacing recreational fishing piers damaged during hurricanes; and $18 million for ship canal operations and maintenance.

Ron Paul on earmarks and ‘corporate welfare’ (Fact Checker biography)

[Sudetenland]

Just proves that Gulf air strangles the capacity to think rationally.