[Catholic Caucus} No peace, no truce

Vox Cantoris ^ | April 23, 2018 | Vox Cantoris

[ebb tide]

Let us pick up here on a thought by Mundabor. In his post, No Rest for the Wicked, he writes; "Some FrancisShills have started to promote some sort of “truce” concerning the way this disgraceful Pontiff is treated by bloggers."

I've seen these calls as well. No. not at all, no truce, no peace, no letting up on exposing the corruption of Jorge Bergoglio. There will be no relaxation on the reporting of the manipulation of his election, which may ultimately be invalidated and he declared an Antipope. No retreat on exposing his evil ideology of globalism, communism and Masonic fraternalism. No retreat against rationalist attack on the supernatural faith. There will be no silence while Bergoglio and his filthy minions continue to attack Catholic doctrine at the same time denying it. 

Can the Pope change doctrine? asked Richard Gaillardetz in National Catholic Reporter and quoted often by many priests, including Thomas Rosica. "No, doctrine changes when pastoral contexts shift and new insights emerge." They don't quote this any longer because they were caught. Instead, these Bergoglians have just gone about doing it. 

In the video interview below and in the book, The Dictator Pope, Dr. Henry Sire reveals that the reforms sought by the ignorant Cardinals, ignorant of the Peronist boil they were putting on the Seat of Peter, have been trashed. Instead, what has emerged is a political, megalomaniacal tyrant, not a Shepherd but a hireling and an evil heresiarch.

Harsh words directed by a lay Catholic to the Vicar of Christ. Yes indeed. harsh words. Francis is the Pope, the Law states it, the priests of the Diocese of Rome verify its fact. The Catholic faithful have accepted it. He is Pope. 

Reality can be very harsh and what some of us have known since March 2013 is now becoming known by many more. That an evil presence has arisen against Holy Mother Church. The Holy Faith is under attack. History, however, can be very harsh and the judgement of future Pope or Council is going to be made upon this period, upon this pompous Peronist, upon bishops such as Coleridge, Cupich, Maradiaga, Danneels and minions such as Faggioli, Spadaro and dozens of others. They will be "judged and found wanting" and they and all their filthy work will be declared anathema.

May the good Lord show mercy upon us and deliver us from these malefactors.

[NobleFree]

the manipulation of his election, which may ultimately be invalidated

Anybody have more on this?

[BlessedBeGod]

the manipulation of his election, which may ultimately be invalidated
Anybody have more on this?

Only this:

[Pope] will be having a terrible May.
Those who backed him will be pushed into the LIGHT>
Dark to LIGHT.
TRUTH.
Q

---

Only a few more days until May, and if it stays on schedule, we'll find out sometime during the month.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Nothing definite --- I'm no canonist and no "inside baseball" Vaticanista --- but this is what I've seen tossed around:

• Invalid resignation by Pope Benedict XVI
  • utterly insufficient and illogical nature of the reasons he gave (e.g. the equivalent of "I just don't want to do gigs like the WYD in Rio"). This, from a disciplined and logical thinker like BXVI, suggests that his remarks were scripted for him, and maybe imposed by some form of coercion

  • BXVI's failure (?) to say he was resigning the papacy, merely saying he was resigning his "public ministry," making this extra-canonical and obscure in a way "the BXVI we know" would never have done

  • BXVI retaining an extracanonical title "Pope Emeritus", form of address "Your Holiness," continuing to wear white papal clericals and the Fisherman's Ring, continuing to live in the Vatican, with his Secretary Ganswein suggesting he sees a dual papacy, "one man active and the other contemplative."

    If Benedict actually believed this, he would have changed Canon Law to reflect this, which he would have had the authority to do all along. But just hinting at it, with no express rationale, no canonical discussion, through a spokesman, at a Press Conference, is Bergoglio's signature way of dealing (not dealing) with things, and not Benedict's,

• Invalidity of the 2013 papal conclave because of impermissible politicking/electioneering by Bergoglio's allies, which entails automatic excommunication

• Material heresy on the part of Pope Francis through frequent pronouncements of a doctrinally impermissible nature (Amoris Laetitia is full of it)

• Formal heresy by causing the "Buenos Aires" statement to be published in the AAS, which means trying to impose as Ordinary Magisterium something which contradicts all previous teachings of the Magisterium.

  This latter point contradicts one of the fundamental rules of formal logic. Non-A cannot equal A.

I'm no canonist, but it seems to me that any one of those four points would be enough to invalidate the Bergoglio papacy.

My opinion and $3.65 will get you a Starbucks Cafe Latte Grande.