Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dan Brown: AI and “collective consciousness” will replace God
Reuters ^ | October 12, 2017 | Douglas Busvine

Posted on 10/12/2017 7:05:04 AM PDT by St. Louis Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: AndyTheBear

Interesting. I’d love to read Descartes and Leibniz. Anything you recommend along the lines of the existence of God and the origin of the universe?


61 posted on 10/13/2017 8:33:11 AM PDT by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Depends on how deep one wants to go on the subject. After work I will compile some links. Right now Im typing quickly on phone..


62 posted on 10/13/2017 8:46:17 AM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
Rene Descarte's "Meditations on First Philosophy" is not easy reading and very misunderstood by most who try (except for the "I think, therefore I am" part which is pretty easy). Took me months to get a reasonable grasp on his cosmological and ontological arguments. But after I understood them, I think they are the most airtight I have ever seen.

Text of Meditations on First Philosophy
Three and a half hour youtube video of it being read

Unfortunately I can't find the objections and replies that go with it online. I had to buy a paper back myself. They are very helpful, and were published with meditations.

Some background on understanding him better I found helpful:

On Descarte's Epistemology

On Descarte's Ontology

If you are newer at natural theology, metaphysics and not wanting to do the deep dive just yet, a few quick videos for some of the simpler arguments for God that are not as tight, but are far easier to follow as quick youtube videos done pretty well:

The "Kalam" Cosmological argument quick video

Leibnitz's Cosmological argument quick video

Can't find the link I had to Leibnitz's cosmological argument...its easier to find commentary about him on web search then his actual work.

As for how the universe was made specifically, they don't cover it. Science had not progressed that far yet, and reason unaided by what science could find some things easier than others--as far as Astrophysics in Descartes time, he had to judiciously carefully word an essay he was going to publish on optics and what they can see about planets etc...after he saw what happened to Galileo for disagreeing with the Catholic clergy on whether the Earth was in motion. George Lamitre was perhaps the first scientist to suggest a theory on how Creation happened. But he did not make it any part of an argument for God's existence. Certaintly Lemitre believed in God (he was a Jesuit Priest as well as a scientist)--but at the time of his proposal it wasn't politically correct to point out that a universe with a particular point at which it started was not consistent with Atheism...and I imagine didn't want his theories rejected because people figured he must be pushing them because he was religious. Decades after he proposed it, Lemtre's theory is now the "Standard Big Bang" model.

63 posted on 10/13/2017 10:15:13 PM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear

Thanks. Looking forward to this.

Did you finish Kurzweil’s singularity? Any further thoughts?


64 posted on 10/15/2017 3:26:09 PM PDT by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
Did you finish Kurzweil’s singularity? Any further thoughts?

Alas, I have not yet gotten back to it, and my mind has been elsewhere this weekend.

65 posted on 10/15/2017 5:22:59 PM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

>>would transform the concept of the divine.

If the divine is just a concept, then it is not divine.


66 posted on 01/14/2018 2:58:58 PM PST by Bryanw92 (Asking a pro athlete for political advice is like asking a cavalry horse for tactical advice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

The Beast.


67 posted on 01/14/2018 2:59:43 PM PST by independentmind (Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

God did not create technology. He created man and endowed him with the ability to make and use technology.


68 posted on 01/14/2018 3:01:15 PM PST by independentmind (Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Man goes to God and says, “We will replace you, we can make Man from dirt just like you.”

God says, “Ok, prove it to me, and I will go away.”

The man goes to pick up some dirt, when he’s suddenly interrupted by God, “No, go make your OWN dirt.”


69 posted on 01/14/2018 3:03:01 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bratch
They are not of the body!


70 posted on 01/14/2018 3:31:18 PM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

The question is what does God think? The psalms are clear. He laughs in derision at such garbage.


71 posted on 01/14/2018 5:54:54 PM PST by Mom MD ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson