Pope’s support of UN’s 2030 Agenda a major threat to children’s lives: new analysis

Voice of the Family via LifeSite News ^ | February 22, 2017 | Voice of the Family

[ebb tide]

Voice of the Family is today publishing an in-depth analysis of the United Nations’ Sustainable Developments Goals (SDGs) and their potential impact on the lives and well-being of children and the wider family. The SDGs consist of 17 goals and 169 targets that nations states have committed themselves to achieve by 2030. The analysis also examines the support offered to the UN agenda by Pope Francis and other representatives of the Holy See.

The briefing explores:

*The goals and targets of the UN SDGs that pose a threat to lives and wellbeing of children, born and unborn;

*The real meaning of the language of “sexual and reproductive health”;

*The destructive consequences of existing UN “sexual and reproductive health programmes” and the planned expansion of such programmes;

*The connection between the SDGs and moves to impose destructive “comprehensive sexuality education” worldwide;

*The strong support for the SDGs expressed by Pope Francis;

*The further support for the SDGs offered by the Pontifical Council for Healthcare Workers, the Pontifical Academy of Science and the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences;

*The increasing convergence between the Vatican and the sex education agenda of the UN, as seen most clearly in the Apostolic Exhortation Amoris Laetitia and the “sexuality education” programme produced by the Pontifical Council for the Family.

Voice of the Family invites you to share this briefing widely, especially with your bishops and clergy, in order that they may be informed of the immediate and serious threat posed to children and the family by the support offered by Pope Francis and Vatican bodies to these aspects of global anti-life and anti-family agenda.

[FlingWingFlyer]

Frankie has got to go.

[dp0622]

He was voted in by folk who must have known what he stood for. It wasn’t a big secret to them. Maybe some of us. AT least me.

I dont see where his ouster would come from.

Catholic schools are barely hanging in there as it is so withholding alms would also hurt the kids, plus I dont think it would have much of an effect.

It’s not a democracy unfortunately, and what the majority of Catholics want doesn’t really affect the situation, I think

I’d be thrilled to be wrong

[GraceG]

Crap like the UN 2030 crap just makes me want to get a huge group of people together and form a group that goes on a fanatical like quest to colonize another damned planet and get away from these control freaks...

[Arthur McGowan]

Bing for: emma bonino pope francis

[Mrs. Don-o]

10, 20, 100 more Trumps.....

[YogicCowboy]

Funny you should say that:

You just summarized my in-the-works science fiction tetralogy.

I began thinking along those lines in the 1990s. Although I had scattered notes along the way, I began writing it in earnest in 2013, after the Communist-In-Chief was re-selected.

Given what Simon & Schuster just did, I am wondering if anyone will publish it - bit I ain’t watering it down no how.

[GraceG]

[ Funny you should say that:

You just summarized my in-the-works science fiction tetralogy.

I began thinking along those lines in the 1990s. Although I had scattered notes along the way, I began writing it in earnest in 2013, after the Communist-In-Chief was re-selected.

Given what Simon & Schuster just did, I am wondering if anyone will publish it - bit I ain’t watering it down no how. ]

The settling of America was done mainly by people wanting to escape the political tyranny of their homelands...

That is how I see space colonization shaking out too...

[YogicCowboy]

Yep: political tyranny... and religious persecution.

[BlatherNaut]

*The goals and targets of the UN SDGs that pose a threat to lives and wellbeing of children, born and unborn;

Priorities, priorities...

Too many plaguey "rabbits" might sully "brother sun", "sister moon", "brother river" and "mother earth." Francis would not approve of that.

[Wuli]

Reduce all U.S. funding to the everything in the U.N. budget outside of the security council, and permit zero U.S. representation on anything U.N. sponsored or run, outside of the security council.