Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bishop discourages Catholics from attending Laura Ingraham [Pro Life Charity] event
Spero News ^ | February 24, 2016 | Martin Barillas

Posted on 02/25/2016 6:39:06 AM PST by ebb tide

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Coleus

Thanks for the contact information. I will make contact in the morning and let y’all know if there is any response: good, bad, or the -— unfortunately, expected -—clerical bafflegab.


41 posted on 02/25/2016 9:14:10 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Tell the truth and shame the Devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Thanks for the contact information. I will make contact in the morning and let y’all know if there is any response: good, bad, or the -— unfortunately, expected -—clerical bafflegab.


42 posted on 02/25/2016 9:14:12 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Tell the truth and shame the Devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan; piusv

That is true, but we have seen it coming along. What is so sad to me is a NEW ruthless attitude of Francis & Company, especially toward bishops who are “traditional.”

They have viciously destroyed numerous careers, maybe lives, of good men from “Trads” to simply Tridentiners. The high-profile ones might have caused an outcry so circumstances were trumped up, eg: age, abuse, finances.

In the modern past, popes and bishops had a “tolerant” attitude toward one another, never punitive.

The nuts and lefties were given free rein in their private lives, as long as they did not hijack the faith. The gays were left alone as long as they did not corrupt the faithful. The “avant garde” thinkers could have rarefied conferences and write books and none of this trickled down to the faithful.

Now the entire upper hierarchy is openly hostile to the conservative element and has adopted a “take no prisoners” approach. Instead of mutual acceptance, the most “devout” are surprised to be sidelined or worse.

Do you see it thus?


43 posted on 02/25/2016 10:00:11 PM PST by opus1 (?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: opus1

I think you’re correct.

Virtually all institutions are now Marxist. Paul VI and JPII filled the hierarchy with Marxists and mediocrities. Francis is the result.

I think he has dementia. He’s getting worse and worse.

I suspect that the Cardinals in the next Conclave are going to want to know: “Is this man’s diocese a disintegrating shambles?”—because that’s what Buenos Aires is.


44 posted on 02/25/2016 10:29:27 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

The first line of the address should read:

The Most Rev. Joseph J. Tyson


45 posted on 02/25/2016 10:36:21 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

If that is the question, it explains why Cupich is aggressively getting his finances in order. The balance sheet is critical to rise to prominence. Those musty old cathedrals and traditional trappings he’s disposing of just make the sentimental folk in the pew long for that old time religion.

As for Cupich, you can almost see him salivating. He may want to be Pope more than any man living. Would be a stretch for an American, but US Cardinals are increasingly becoming Bergoglio darlings. They are getting to be thicker and more cunning than Italians.

Tagle and Ouellet are actually men with some spirituality, so, similar to JP2, perhaps more easily manouvered. Isn’t Ouellet’s diocese is in tip-top shape? What about little Tagle?

I understand what you are saying about JP2, but I think he had no ill intent, he was too much of an angel to control it all. The altar server thing was manipulated by Sodano.


46 posted on 02/25/2016 10:47:30 PM PST by opus1 (?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan; Coleus

Form of address “Your Excellency” - although I would not write if not a Catholic in the diocese of Yakima in good standing. Your letter will not be read, nor should it be, as it is outside their jurisdiction.

Subjects write only to their own bishops. These men don’t care how eloquent you are or what you think, so you only look ignorant addressing them outside of respected authority or protocol.


47 posted on 02/25/2016 10:57:09 PM PST by opus1 (?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

“So many different Bishops with so many different opinions. ..”

So true. There was a bishop in PA on a radio show that said that agreeing, or disagreeing on illegal immigration is a matter of opinion, but believing in abortion is definitely WRONG. (I’m paraphrasing.)


48 posted on 02/26/2016 12:01:23 AM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: opus1

I think the main problem with your thinking is it is expressed in political terms: left vs right. What is going on in the post Vatican II years has more to do with Catholic vs. non-Catholic.


49 posted on 02/26/2016 7:11:31 AM PST by piusv (The Spirit of Christ hasn't refrained from using separated churches as means of salvation:VII heresy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

This bishop has ZERO authority to make these statements.

This is not a dogmatic teaching of the church. It is pure political hyperbole.

That’s besides the point that he is completely wrong on the issue.

Talk about something you really know about.


50 posted on 02/26/2016 8:27:59 AM PST by diamond6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

thanks...forgot about that, I just copy and pasted from his diocesan website...


51 posted on 02/26/2016 7:42:29 PM PST by Coleus (For the sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us and on the whole world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: piusv

This is a political blog and I was thinking in terms of the political issues in the hierarchy that Catholics in the USA are finally, on the pew level, starting to realize. I was not addressing the Church as a whole, certainly.

What you describe is true since V@, and so is the case of Catholic vs. Catholic vs. Catholic, now winnowing down to just 2 of the 3.


52 posted on 02/26/2016 11:09:35 PM PST by opus1 (google is not the font of all wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: opus1
This is a political blog

This is true and I forget that politics is the focus of most of the posters here even in the Religion sub-forum.

53 posted on 02/27/2016 4:20:24 AM PST by piusv (The Spirit of Christ hasn't refrained from using separated churches as means of salvation:VII heresy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson