Posted on 09/25/2015 7:54:36 AM PDT by Salvation
In all the coverage of Pope Francis visit to Washington, many are doing an admirable job of analyzing what is being said and done. The nature of this blog is less the coverage of happening now news and more a steady pondering of the message of the Gospel and how it relates to our cultural setting.
Permit, therefore, a brief observation of the papal visit from the standpoint of the crowds that flock to see him. Please do not take this as a strong critique, but rather as a humorous commentary on how quirky we can be.
Thus, one of the questions that occurs to me is whether the crowds that assemble to see the Pope really DO see the Pope, or whether they are so busy getting the picture that they almost miss the moment. The scramble seems to be less to see him than to get that picture.
I guess I notice this because I live just up the street from the U.S. Capitol and I have noticed for years the tourists going by on the buses. Many of them are so busy taking a picture of the Capitol (a picture they could easily find in a book or on the Internet) that I wonder if they ever see the Capitol with their own eyes.
The strangest and latest twist on this idea that getting the picture is more important than actually seeing, is the notion of the selfie. I saw more than a few folks along the route with their backs to the Pope holding up the camera. The selfie shows them in the foreground with the Pope passing by in the background. Talk about not seeing the Pope! Quite literally, their backs are turned to him. It seems more important to capture the fact that I was there than to actually experience seeing the Pope, or any dignitary or historic site for that matter.
Before digital photography, one had to be judicious in taking pictures. A roll of film had perhaps 24 pictures, and developing and printing the pictures was expensive. Today, the whole process is practically free. Now, hundreds of pictures may be taken whereas only two or three were possible before. This limitation of the past preserved the actual experience and relegated the pictures of it to a lesser role. Today the pictures are increasingly eclipsing the event itself.
Again, please do not take this observation in a weightier manner than it is intended. I am not writing to strongly condemn all of this. I just want to point out, humorously I hope, how quirky we can be, especially in enthusiastic moments. I have written on more significant concerns about the liturgy here: Photos and the Liturgy.
Perhaps a bit of advice is in order to us who frantically seek to get the picture while we risk missing the actual experience: Dont just do something, stand there!
**I just want to point out, humorously I hope, how quirky we can be, especially in enthusiastic moments. **
Monsignor Pope Ping!
Okay, Francis. Your job is done. You may now go back to the Vatican.
There’s nothing funny about this guy. He’s a Marxist and globalist and his carbon taxes would lead to the death of millions.
To actually see something is to interact with it, and to submit to a relationship with it; to take a picture of something is to possess it. There is a spiritual lesson here: God wants us to interact with Him, which forces us to submit to a relationship based on His will, but we want to take figurative pictures of our spiritual experiences, so that we can possess the experiences without having to submit to God.
Naah, just the leftover hot air from his speech.
I am not writing to strongly condemn all of this.
Wise words indeed. I echo that I do not refer to the Pope or his religion, nor his followers. That said, I would like to give my take on the MSM. The whole coverage is one of adulation. Why is this? When evangelicals and even strict Christian followers are often dumped on by the MSM.
Their enormous power is thus demonstrated. They can destroy or make even a president. They can flatten a political candidate. One false move and they are destroyed. The power of the MSM seems to me to be evident. They followed in lock step to eulogise the Pope.
A demonstration of who they are and the danger they pose to rational and independent thought. (jmho)
Didn’t you read any of his speeches? He praised America in one.
I disagree with you completely.
Here's one for ya', was Michelles' daughter picking her nose or using her middle finger as a proxy for her father?
This is what I said. ‘Hes a Marxist and globalist and his carbon taxes would lead to the death of millions.”
So, he’s not a Marxist?
He’s not a globalist?
Carbon taxes will not lead to the death of millions?
I don’t know, looks like a photo finish.
I have been given much and I mean that more in my mental, spiritual, and physical gifts than in the material. Although I have never been homeless or a refuge. So there is that.
Papa makes me think, am I using my gifts to the fullest? Where am I selfish. After my needs are taken care of, how much more do I need? How many cars, houses, TVs, shoes etc. I don't have to give it all up. But can I give up some to help someone else? Do I do that enough?
My two cents.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.