Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Must Christianity Change Its Sexual Ethics? History May Hold The Key
The Aquila Report ^ | 4-19-15 | Trevin Wax

Posted on 04/19/2015 1:56:33 PM PDT by ReformationFan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: All
" Must Christianity Change Its Sexual Ethics?"

 photo 29063_thumb.jpg


Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


21 posted on 04/19/2015 3:04:09 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Moreover, that point boils down to whether or not a person is willing to have Jesus as their Savior, because Jesus made it plain that He only saves people who are willing to obey him.

Those who decline to follow Him cannot be granted eternal life.

Now people are free to excuse this all away, but then God is free to decline to give them the priceless (but conditional) gift of eternal life.


22 posted on 04/19/2015 3:07:14 PM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Modernist Christianity is for people who feel like they should probably go to church but either they don’t really believe all that stuff or that stuff is kind of irrelevant.


23 posted on 04/19/2015 3:15:03 PM PDT by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Christians, Jews, and that sex thing
24 posted on 04/19/2015 3:19:41 PM PDT by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

I suppose that could be true.


25 posted on 04/19/2015 3:25:56 PM PDT by Tax-chick (I'm a radical feminist. Galatians 3:28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver; Tax-chick

“Either the Bible is true and sufficient or its merely a historical book.”

Right answer!


26 posted on 04/19/2015 3:26:01 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Exactly. I overheard a conversation between two co-workers, one who goes to a so-called “Mainline” Protestant church and the other was officially completing his RCIA so he and his wife could get officially married in the Roman Catholic Church. The RCIA one was telling her about how he doesn’t believe much of it but just going through with it to please his wife while the liberal Protestant thought it was wonderful that Pope Francis seemed so liberal to her. I couldn’t help but think what exactly was the point of either of them going to church at all?


27 posted on 04/19/2015 3:52:10 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
I have no idea what you're talking about. Who's the "mob lost in Egypt"?

Is this some anti-Semitic in-joke?

28 posted on 04/19/2015 4:04:19 PM PDT by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; Tax-chick; manc; ReformationFan; metmom; Ethan Clive Osgoode
Post 1 by Reformation Fan asks this question

It ultimately boils down to a question of does one believe the Bible to be true or not?

You, SoConPubbie, and in essence parroted by Tax-Chick and Manc, replied: "Stupid question."

I beg to disagree.

Reformation Fan's question cuts straight to the issue at hand and is the core question which must be answered -- by Christians and non-Christians alike.

Sadly too many who call themselves "Christians" yet pick and choose what they want to believe about the Bible, essentially create a god in their image, instead of worshiping the God of the Bible who created us all in His image.

The penchant for creating god in one's own image is part and parcel of evolutionary dogma where man creates himself from slime and evolves into the glimmering self-important godless egotist he becomes.

I contend that this same evolutionary dogma is at the foundation of what is to be found leading to this present day societal reversal which in turn is leading us to a redefining of "marriage" not how God established it but how man chooses to manipulate the term "marriage." Man does this to serve his own lust of convenience, not in any way intended to affirm how God Himself both ordained and designed the institution to be a reflection of His relationship to the Church.

Again sadly there are too many Christians beguiled into a functional infidelity with Christ, who have bought the lie that society's social "scientists" have won the evolutionary argument and they meekly knuckle under to a redefining of "love thy neighbor" as merely "go along to get along" without standing for the Truth found in the Word of God -- even as we are commanded to do in Ephesians 6.

FReegards!

 photo million-vet-march.jpg

29 posted on 04/19/2015 4:06:16 PM PDT by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chainmail

Read the bible and you’ll figure it out.


30 posted on 04/19/2015 5:08:20 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: driftdiver; Tax-chick
I think what tax-chick is referring to is Natural Law. It is the type of Law that is built into the very structure of our bodies, our bones, our brains, and our Universe. It corresponds to real human needs and requirements. It has the same source as Supernatural Law, since God is the author of both the Book of Nature and the Book of Scripture.

Paul refers to this when he says,

Romans 2:15
"They [Gentiles who do not have the Law] show that the demands of the law are written in their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness and their conflicting thoughts accuse or even defend them"

33 posted on 04/19/2015 6:21:09 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Quod scripsit, scripsit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Agamemnon; ReformationFan; Mrs. Don-o

I think I’ve misunderstood the whole discussion. I was not saying Reformation Man’s question was stupid, but rather that the question in the headline is stupid.

I thought that was the topic.

Oops.


34 posted on 04/19/2015 6:23:40 PM PDT by Tax-chick (I'm a radical feminist. Galatians 3:28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: ReformationFan

This is an excellent article, thank you for posting. I believe what it truly boils down to is “Does God love us?” My answer is always “yes”. Which means that God tells us right from wrong because of that love. He knows the enemy is death and He shows us the way we can have life. A life of the spirit that rejects the vanity of the World,the Flesh, and the Devil.

The Bible is true and for Christians to decide its wisdom and truth do not suit the times shows a narcissism that is not unique to this age but which has been allowed to grow aggressive with the help of the media, the elite, and even our own churches.


36 posted on 04/20/2015 7:30:57 AM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson