Posted on 04/16/2015 6:28:43 AM PDT by NKP_Vet
Going in circles with some internet stranger that wants to make things up is exhausting.
Rubio said: “I’m a Roman Catholic.”
I have reported all of the posts by ansel12 that infers or states that NKP_Vet and I are liars.
Rubio said: “I’m a Roman Catholic.”
Forms of "making it personal" include mind reading, attributing motive, accusing another Freeper of telling a lie (because it attributes motive, the intent to deceive) - ...The words "prevarication" "dishonesty" "slander" "deceit" "calumny" and "subterfuge" are synonymous with "lie" because they entail intent.
Words such as "false" "error" "wrong" "inaccurate" "misstatement" do not attribute motive and are not "making it personal."
Who are you saying “makes things up?. Every word I post about a politician is referenced and if not referenced I can get the reference. Like Strother Martin said in Cool Hand Luke “what we have is a failure to communicate”. You can’t communicate with someone that refuses acknowledge facts that don’t fit in with their preconceived notions about something or someone.
Linking opinions and opinion pieces, is not referencing facts.
Most everything you post to support your own strange opinions, are just opinions that agree with you, or you simply post something like White voted against Roe in the 1970s, so JFK must be pro-life because he appointed him, which is just silly nonsense, of course you do that while ignoring the actual facts that we know about the liberal democrats connections to abortion, from aborting his own children, to his conversations with a major journalist friend and neighbor.
“Byron White happening to turn out to vote as he did in the 1970s on abortion, has zero to do with JFK.
JFK was pro-abortion and supported it, but it wasn’t related to any of the campaigning, or choosing of Supreme court justices, that far back in history”
OK let me break down how Supreme Court justices are chosen. The president makes his selection and the Congress confirms them. Now see how easy that was. Presidents choose jurists that are in line with their political philosophy. Sometimes the picks backfire on him and they get it wrong. But socially conservative JFK picked a judge that was exactly like him and he ended up being a great champion of conservative causes, especially a champion of pro-life. He also voted time and again against the legalization of sodomy. The number one way that presidents have a lasting impact on the country is through their Supreme Court appointees. Thank God JFK chose Byron White, and thank God he served on the court for many years.
Wow, nonsense, you try to portray an era that didn’t exist in 1960 and 1962, to portray a man that didn’t exist, what you call the man who led to the tea party and who would leave his democrat party to be a tea party member today.
I just wonder what your agenda is, after having dealt with so many Mormons, I think I understand completely.
One more time so maybe you can comprehend how Supreme Court justices are chosen. After this you’re on your own. It’s like talking to the wall.
“Presidents choose jurists that are in line with their political philosophy. Sometimes the picks backfire on him and they get it wrong. But socially conservative JFK picked a judge that was exactly like him and he ended up being a great champion of conservative causes, especially a champion of pro-life. He also voted time and again against the legalization of sodomy. The number one way that presidents have a lasting impact on the country is through their Supreme Court appointees. Thank God JFK chose Byron White, and thank God he served on the court for many years”.
What do you have against social conservative judges?
LOL, abortion wasn’t on the radar, so JFK had no idea what White’s position was on abortion, and besides, JFK was pro-abortion and would abort his own kids, and felt that it was a valid way to fix problems.
There was no “social conservative” movement back then, there were not candidates pushing abortion and homosexuality and social liberalism, but JFK was the worst of the worst, with his open marriage, numerous affairs, aborting his own kids, sex with teen girls, and having them perform sex acts on friends.
I don’t know where you get your ideas about politics and issues of the 1950s and 1960 America, nor JFK as a good and moral man.
You have so many strange ideas that it is too overwhelming to try and get you to the starting point of reality and history.
One more time. Read it slow. Let it sink in. Maybe you will comprehend the words this time. But I seriously doubt it. But do yourself and me a big favor and please do not reply to me anymore. I’m through replying to any post from you.
“Presidents choose jurists that are in line with their political philosophy. Sometimes the picks backfire on him and they get it wrong. But socially conservative JFK picked a judge that was exactly like him and he ended up being a great champion of conservative causes, especially a champion of pro-life. He also voted time and again against the legalization of sodomy. The number one way that presidents have a lasting impact on the country is through their Supreme Court appointees. Thank God JFK chose Byron White, and thank God he served on the court for many years”.
Insane.
How sad how wrong he was though, huh?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.