Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mormon bishop: Harry Reid unworthy to enter temples
Washington Times ^ | November 8, 2014 | By - Associated Press - Saturday, November 8, 2014

Posted on 11/08/2014 2:48:50 PM PST by greyfoxx39

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last
To: Din Maker; All
ALL: Many assume that Utah has ALWAYS been some Republican stronghold.

That's just not the case.

In the 1850s, when Utah was still a territory, the fledgling Republican party said it would take on the "twin relics of barbarism" -- slavery and polygamy. And it did in the latter part of the 19th century...which, didn't make the Republicans popular among polygamist Utah.

So...when we look at the actual first Utah post-statehood election in 1896, what do we find?

In the first presidential contest held after achieving statehood in 1896, however, Utah Democrats did well, drawing more than eighty percent of the presidential vote for William Jennings Bryan and electing a variety of Democrats to state and local office as well. That same year, William H. King was elected to Congress and the Democratic legislature selected Joseph L. Rawlins to serve as U. S. Senator. Two years later, the Democrats elected B. H. Roberts to Congress although he was denied his seat because of his practice of plural marriage. Roberts was eventually replaced by William H. King in a special election held in April 1900.
Source: http://www.media.utah.edu/UHE/d/DEMOCRATIC.html [Note: This link is now dead, so that's why I don't make it a live link anymore; but this was info at one time obtained from this source]

We know that in the Utah state Legislature assuming office that 39 in the Utah House of Reps in 1897 were Democrats, only 3 were Republicans & 3 were Populists. In the state Senate, it was a 17-0 shutout for the Democrats (plus one populist).

By 1900, the parties became balanced, and then the Democrats dropped off for a while in Utah as Republican’s Teddy Roosevelt’s ways carried the national day:

Utah Democrats were far less successful after 1900 -- But the Democrats rebounded with the help of the Progressive Party in 1914:

Per http://www.media.utah.edu/UHE/d/DEMOCRATIC.html (now defunct):
In 1914, Utah Democrats allied with the Progressive party to take control of both houses of the Utah legislature as well as many county offices. Two years later, the Democrats scored a major victory garnering the state's electoral votes for Wilson, and electing Simon Bamberger as Governor, William H. King to the U.S. Senate and both representatives in Congress. The state legislature was overwhelmingly Democratic as well.

So I’d say my statement Do you realize that most Lds political leaders from the 19th century into the early 20th century were Democrats? was accurate, wouldn’t you MM – especially also considering that Democrats dominated in Utah throughout the 1930s?

Same source:

In the early 1930s, Utah Democrats, like their counterparts across the nation, emerged greatly strengthened by the candidacy of Franklin D. Roosevelt. Utah Governor Dern was selected by FDR to serve as Secretary of War in the first Roosevelt cabinet. In 1932, Elbert D. Thomas, a professor at the University of Utah, defeated Reed Smoot in a bitter contest and served in the Senate until he was defeated in a similarly bitter race in 1950. Moreover, a resurgent Democratic party paved the way for the emergence of the leading Utah Democrat of his generation -- Herbert B. Maw. Elected first to the state senate in 1928, Maw, an attorney and University of Utah professor, became the leader of the liberal, pro-FDR, wing of the party. In 1937, he was President of the Utah State Senate during one of the most liberal sessions in its history. This legislature passed bills dealing with relief and assistance and unemployment and enacted an open primary law that would strongly affect Democratic candidates. For the next decade, liberal forces dominated Utah's Democratic party, most notable Senator King, continued to hold office. In 1940, Maw was elected governor and was reelected four years later. In 1948, he ran for an unprecedented third term. As the result of scandals within his administration, and a weakened campaign organization, Maw was defeated by Utah political maverick J. Bracken Lee.

Even in the 1920s, Utah had a three-term Democratic senator (mentioned above) – Sen. King – who was re-elected in 1922 & 1928 due to internal divisions within the Utah GOP.

81 posted on 11/09/2014 5:56:35 PM PST by Colofornian (Harry Reid, to BYU campus body, 2007: "I am a Democrat BECAUSE I am a Mormon, not in spite of it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian; Din Maker

Also.

“”(Reuters) - Pope Benedict was baptized at birth and will most likely be baptized again one year after his death, not by his Roman Catholic Church but by a Mormon he never met.

So Benedict looks set to join his predecessor John Paul and a centuries-long list of popes Mormons have baptized — despite the fact that he, back when he was the Vatican’s top doctrinal authority, ruled that Mormon baptisms were not even Christian.””


82 posted on 11/09/2014 5:56:56 PM PST by ansel12 (The churlish behavior of Obama over the next two years is going to be spellbinding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39; All
Just posted...Reid spokesman response to this Mormon bishop: Mormon Bishop Under Fire for Harry Reid Criticism [Reid spokesman responds to Lds bishop]
83 posted on 11/09/2014 6:08:59 PM PST by Colofornian (Harry Reid, to BYU campus body, 2007: "I am a Democrat BECAUSE I am a Mormon, not in spite of it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
From that thread just posted (FR link @ above post...found originally here on ABC News: Mormon Bishop Under Fire for Harry Reid Criticism

Reid spokeswoman Kristen Orthman on Saturday released a letter from a Mormon Democrat in Las Vegas to Paredes. "Our comment to this is to show you one of many comments Sen. Reid has received from his friends," Orthman said. The letter was written by Charles Zobell, a 56-year member of the church and a former longtime editor of the Las Vegas Review-Journal. Both he and his wife are lifelong Democrats. "Your very public comments on Sen. Harry Reid, a faithful member of the Church, were outrageous and unbecoming a priesthood holder in your position of influence. In short, they were un-Christian ... You should apologize to (him) and to every LDS Democrat you have so viciously disparaged," Zobell wrote. "I am so tired of self-righteous members of my own Church telling me I cannot be a Democrat and a good Mormon ... I cannot see how anyone can read the Book of Mormon and the New Testament and not have more compassion and charity for others. Those have been hallmarks of the Democratic Party since the days of Franklin Roosevelt and earlier," he added.

84 posted on 11/09/2014 6:11:29 PM PST by Colofornian (Harry Reid, to BYU campus body, 2007: "I am a Democrat BECAUSE I am a Mormon, not in spite of it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru
Not being a Mormon, I have always wondered if that tithe bit was Smith’s idea ? ? ? ?

I can tell you whose idea it WASN'T!!!


2 Corinthians 9:7 NIV
Each of you should give what you have decided in your heart to give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver.

85 posted on 11/10/2014 3:28:51 AM PST by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru
Could one then say that when the Democrats were emailing those “We know if you didn’t vote” threats they were exercising their “Inner Mormon”?

Possibly

It sure sounds that is what happened with some of our FREEPERS who chastise ME for not voting for Mitt!

86 posted on 11/10/2014 3:30:09 AM PST by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill
Horse poop.

What a BRILLIANT reply!

It sure saves a LOT of typing; trying to actually put some facts on the screen!

87 posted on 11/10/2014 3:31:46 AM PST by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Not at all, Harry Reid is an exceptionally devout and true Mormon and will become a God himself after he dies...

Yup folks; that's what Mormon Scripture SAYS!!!


The Doctrine and Covenants

Section 132

Revelation given through Joseph Smith the Prophet, at Nauvoo, Illinois, recorded 12 July 1843, relating to the new and everlasting covenant, including the eternity of the marriage covenant, and also the plurality of wives (see History of the Church, 5:501–7). Although the revelation was recorded in 1843, it is evident from the historical records that the doctrines and principles involved in this revelation had been known by the Prophet since 1831.

1–6, Exaltation is gained through the new and everlasting covenant; 7–14, The terms and conditions of that covenant are set forth; 15–20, Celestial marriage and a continuation of the family unit enable men to become gods; 21–25, The strait and narrow way leads to eternal lives; 26–27, The law is given relative to blasphemy against the Holy Ghost; 28–39, Promises of eternal increase and exaltation are made to prophets and Saints in all ages; 40–47, Joseph Smith is given the power to bind and seal on earth and in heaven; 48–50, The Lord seals upon him his exaltation; 51–57, Emma Smith is counseled to be faithful and true; 58–66, Laws governing the plurality of wives are set forth.

 


 

 16Therefore, when they are out of the world they neither marry nor are given in amarriage; but are appointed angels in bheaven, which angels are ministering cservants, to minister for those who are worthy of a far more, and an exceeding, and an eternal weight of glory.

 17For these angels did not abide my law; therefore, they cannot be enlarged, but remain separately and singly, without exaltation, in their saved condition, to all eternity; and from henceforth are not gods, but are aangels of God forever and ever.

 18And again, verily I say unto you, if a man marry a wife, and make a covenant with her for time and for all eternity, if that acovenant is not by me or by my word, which is my law, and is not sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise, through him whom I have anointed and appointed unto this power, then it is not valid neither of force when they are out of the world, because they are not joined by me, saith the Lord, neither by my word; when they are out of the world it cannot be received there, because the angels and the gods are appointed there, by whom they cannot pass; they cannot, therefore, inherit my glory; for my house is a house of order, saith the Lord God.

 19And again, verily I say unto you, if a man amarry a wife by my word, which is my law, and by the new and beverlasting covenant, and it is csealed unto them by the Holy Spirit of dpromise, by him who is anointed, unto whom I have appointed this power and the ekeys of this priesthood; and it shall be said unto them—Ye shall come forth in the first resurrection; and if it be after the first resurrection, in the next resurrection; and shall inherit fthrones, kingdoms, principalities, and powers, dominions, all heights and depths—then shall it be written in the Lamb’s gBook of Life, that he shall commit no hmurder whereby to shed innocent iblood, and if ye abide in my covenant, and commit no murder whereby to shed innocent blood, it shall be done unto them in all things whatsoever my servant hath put upon them, in time, and through all eternity; and shall be of full force when they are out of the world; and they shall pass by the angels, and the gods, which are set there, to their jexaltation and glory in all things, as hath been sealed upon their heads, which glory shall be a fulness and a continuation of the kseeds forever and ever.

 20 Then shall they be gods, because they have no end; therefore shall they be from aeverlasting to everlasting, because they continue; then shall they be above all, because all things are subject unto them. Then shall they be bgods, because they have call power, and the angels are subject unto them.

 21Verily, verily, I say unto you, except ye abide my alaw ye cannot attain to this glory.

 22For astrait is the gate, and narrow the bway that leadeth unto the exaltation and continuation of the clives, and few there be that find it, because ye receive me not in the world neither do ye know me.

 23But if ye receive me in the world, then shall ye know me, and shall receive your exaltation; that awhere I am ye shall be also.

 24This is aeternal lives—to bknow the only wise and true God, and Jesus Christ, whom he hath csent. I am he. Receive ye, therefore, my law.

 25aBroad is the gate, and wide the way that leadeth to the bdeaths; and many there are that go in thereat, because they creceive me not, neither do they abide in my law.


88 posted on 11/10/2014 3:36:40 AM PST by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Yup folks; that's what Mormon Scripture SAYS!!!


but there's a catch...



"Now if any of you will deny the plurality of wives, and continue to do so, I promise that you will be damned;

and I will go still further and say, take this revelation, or any other revelation that the Lord has given,

and deny it in your feelings, and I promise that you will be damned.

Brigham Young - JoD 3:266 (July 14, 1855)


89 posted on 11/10/2014 3:37:49 AM PST by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Living Prophet #2 really is telling the TRUTH above, or is lying.

Mormon’s are between a ROCK and a Hard Place!


90 posted on 11/10/2014 3:38:58 AM PST by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Taking up a Mormon tithe collection...



91 posted on 11/10/2014 3:42:27 AM PST by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Do you realize that most Lds political leaders from the 19th century into the early 20th century were Democrats?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

But, they weren’t like today’s Democrats. Today’s Democratic Party started to hell in a hand-basket in 1964, under LBJ.


92 posted on 11/10/2014 11:23:27 AM PST by Din Maker (I've always been crazy, but, that's the only thing that's kept me from going insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson