Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: YHAOS

YHAOS, I decided to respond privately. But I would ask, for teh purposes of this public thread, exactly who are the ‘we’ you were referring to in your original post?

And (at the risk of getting you more exercised over this) please don’t make assumptions about my views on the basis of one exception I took (misguided as you might think it may be) to your posting.


19 posted on 07/22/2013 12:45:27 PM PDT by Quality_Not_Quantity (Liars use facts when the truth doesn't suit their purposes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Quality_Not_Quantity
I would ask, for the purposes of this public thread, exactly who are the ‘we’ you were referring to in your original post?

Very well, then. For the purposes of this public thread. Read the original post. What does it say? What authority did I cite in my riposte to your response?

. . . .please don’t make assumptions about my views on the basis of one exception I took . . .

Then don’t attempt to Pelosi my postings. You not only took exception. Your behavior conveyed the presumption that your exception was categorical and must be accepted as definitive. What did you think my assumption would be?

20 posted on 07/22/2013 3:12:04 PM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson