Them ‘Damned’ Catholics

Walid Shoebat ^ | Wednesday June 12, 2013 | Walid Shoebat

[roamer_1]

Good, you and the Muzzie “distraction” will get along just fine when the distraction is slitting throats.

And Mussolini made the trains run on time. What hath light have to do with darkness?

[Rashputin]

You tell me, you're the one calling the Anti-Christ, Satanic, Muzzies a distraction and Christians the real problem.

[roamer_1]

You tell me, you're the one calling the Anti-Christ, Satanic, Muzzies a distraction and Christians the real problem.

No, I am telling you that I most certainly will not be swimming the Tiber because of the Muslim horde. that does not nullify 'Come out of her, my people'. The Roman church can pat her own back all she wants, it doesn't change the cup she holds.

'Horns like a lamb, but speaks like a dragon'... here's your sign...

[Rashputin]

Did I ask you “swim the Tiber”?

I don't ask folks who flee from a Crucifix like a bunch of low budget movie Vampires to do anything.

I simply posted what I think is an excellent article that addresses some of the silly divisions and the lies and absurd thinking that serve to divide Christians. Divisions and lies encouraged along with the spreading of blasphemies by both ignorant, misled, people, and people who claim to be Christian and are not, or who claim to be Jews and are not and who are in reality liars from the synagogue of Satan.

[roamer_1]

I simply posted what I think is an excellent article that addresses some of the silly divisions and the lies and absurd thinking that serve to divide Christians. Divisions and lies encouraged along with the spreading of blasphemies by both ignorant, misled, people, and people who claim to be Christian and are not, or who claim to be Jews and are not and who are in reality liars from the synagogue of Satan.

Right. I know about them- The Roman church and her false ecumenicsim, the lies of popery, the absurd thinking of tradition. the division created by claimed authority and conversion by the sword. The blasphemy of idolatry and paganism, pantheons of saints... alternatives to Yeshua (anti-christ)...

That is not the TRUTH of YHWH. Unity will come in truth.

[Rashputin]

I see, so Jesus Christ isn’t the only begotten Son of God who died for our sins ?

[Repulican Donkey]

My you are a bird walker. In your rush to say “nanny nanny boo boo” you missed the point. The only point I am making is that our American view on history is colored by our English heritage and that heritage is colored by Henry VIII’s dynastic progeny difficulties and Henry’s decision to make himself “head of the church in England”. He achieved his Defender of the Faith moniker for refuting Luther. Once he broke with Rome, any teacher, historian or writer did so at peril of his life. Ask Thomas More. In your “Oh, please” doesn’t address my point: Charles Martel, Ferdinand and Isabella, Jan Sobieski are either untaught or unrecognized in English / American military history.

Regarding the Crusades: the Bible is replete with epistles to churches throughout present day Turkey, Lebanon, Iraq and Syria. The same is true of North Africa. Islam conquered and destroyed all of them. The Crusades were a defensive response to Islamic expansionism.

[roamer_1]

I see, so Jesus Christ isn’t the only begotten Son of God who died for our sins ?

Yeshua the Messiah is the Son of YHWH, who died for our sins.

[Natural Law]

"Yeshua the Messiah is the Son of YHWH, who died for our sins."

Is Jesus Lord? Is Jesus the Second Person of the Trinity, eternally begotten of the Father before all ages?

[roamer_1]

My you are a bird walker. In your rush to say “nanny nanny boo boo” you missed the point. The only point I am making is that our American view on history is colored by our English heritage and that heritage is colored by Henry VIII’s dynastic progeny difficulties and Henry’s decision to make himself “head of the church in England”. He achieved his Defender of the Faith moniker for refuting Luther. Once he broke with Rome, any teacher, historian or writer did so at peril of his life. Ask Thomas More. In your “Oh, please” doesn’t address my point: Charles Martel, Ferdinand and Isabella, Jan Sobieski are either untaught or unrecognized in English / American military history.

I am not missing any point. I declared the point too narrow. The OP is, like you seemed to have, glossing over the horrible atrocities the Roman church has intentionally performed. If you care to complain about Martel not being taught, why then shouldn't De Montfort be taught too? why did that fail to come to mind?

Regarding the Crusades: the Bible is replete with epistles to churches throughout present day Turkey, Lebanon, Iraq and Syria. The same is true of North Africa. Islam conquered and destroyed all of them. The Crusades were a defensive response to Islamic expansionism.

not the ones in Europe. And the Jews might have a different view of the 'defensive responses' of the Roman church in the Holy Land and Spain.

[Natural Law]

Jessep: (Jack Nicholson) You want answers?
Kaffee (Tom Cruise): I think I'm entitled to them.
Jessep: You want answers?
Kaffee: I want the truth!
Jessep: You can't handle the truth! Son, we live in a world that has walls. And those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago and you curse the Marines. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: that Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives...You don't want the truth. Because deep down, in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that wall. You need me on that wall. We use words like honor, code, loyalty...we use these words as the backbone to a life spent defending something. You use 'em as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide, then questions the manner in which I provide it! I'd rather you just said thank you and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you're entitled to!
Kaffee: Did you order the code red?
Jessep: (quietly) I did the job you sent me to do.
Kaffee: Did you order the code red?
Jessep: You're goddamn right I did!!

[RegulatorCountry]

Ooh, a movie reference. There’s a nice TouTube of Mel Brooks’ treatment of the Spanish Inquisition, speaking of movies.

[roamer_1]

Is Jesus Lord? Is Jesus the Second Person of the Trinity, eternally begotten of the Father before all ages?

Hos 2:16 And it shall be at that day, saith the LORD, that thou shalt call me Ishi; and shalt call me no more Baali.

[Salvation]

That book was mistakenly identified. It is the Orthodox Book of the Gospels — always green in color.

[Rashputin]

Don't bother, Salvation. People who still post that picture and the lie about the book being a Koran already know it's not a Koran and don't want the Truth to mess up their little games.

People in little Gnostic cliques prefer lies to the Truth so they repeat lies.

[RobbyS]

If you belong to a Church that has false teachings, that is likely to have some effect on your relation with Jesus. Both sides in the Reformation knew this.

[RobbyS]

Not to put too fine a “pint” on it, what “horrible attrocities” has the Church of Rome committed that were worse than those committed by Protestants? In the religious wars in France and later in Germany, both sides acted with savagery. In England, the government of Elizabeth persecuted both Puritans and Papists with zeal, but killed as many Papists as Mary killed Protestants. Oliver Cromwell was as savage in his suppression of the Catholic uprising in Ireland as the Inquisition had been in the Netherlands.

[johngrace]

Soon we will need to help each other. Thanks for article.

[Uri’el-2012]

That book was mistakenly identified. It is the Orthodox Book of the Gospels — always green in color.

Eastern Orthodox

Among Eastern Orthodox and Eastern Catholics the Gospel Book (Greek: Εὐαγγέλιον,
Evangélion) is very important liturgically. It is considered to be an icon of Christ, and is venerated in the same manner as an icon. Traditionally, the Orthodox will never cover the Gospel Book in leather—the skin of a
dead animal—because the words of Christ are considered to be life-giving. Animal
skins are also reminiscent of the Fall of Man, when God fashioned garments of skin
for Adam and Eve after their disobedience (Genesis 3:21). The Apostle Paul speaks
of Christ being the "New Adam" (I_Corinthians 15:22,47-49), and the Orthodox
understand Christ as coming to clothe mankind in the original "garments of light"
which Adam and Eve lost in Paradise. Traditionally, the Gospel is covered in gold, the earthly element which is best symbolizes the glory of Heaven.
If gold is unavailable, the Gospel may be covered in cloth..

From Wiki

shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach

[Salvation]

Interesting about the dead animal thing.