Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/28/2013 7:17:26 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marshmallow

Some things are intolerable.


2 posted on 05/28/2013 7:32:02 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

tolerate my diversity.


3 posted on 05/28/2013 7:37:02 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (we're the Beatniks now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow

Intolerance shall not be tolerated!


4 posted on 05/28/2013 7:45:27 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow

I garrantee that God will not be tolerate against sin to make someone feel good and included. The standard by which we live is Christ by His Grace. It’s a fight to stand agInst unrighteousness come what may.


5 posted on 05/28/2013 7:56:34 AM PDT by PrepareToLeave (Arrows of the Almighty @ Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow

A very great historian in 1888 gave an interesting twist on the meaning of “Tolerance” for our time: “Tolerance” the inability to take a stand, the inability to say Yes or No.”


6 posted on 05/28/2013 8:02:38 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow
Bishop Toso denounced attempts to divide religious belief from religious practice. Christians, he said, are told “they can believe whatever they like in their own homes or heads, and largely worship as they wish in their own private churches, but they simply cannot act on those beliefs in public.” This distinction, he went on, “is a deliberate twisting and limiting of what religious freedom actually means.”

Is this actually what he said, or just what the media clowns reported?

Distinguishing between belief and action is an obvious corollary to religious freedom. For example, you're allowed to believe that God wants you to perform human sacrifices or take a dozen wives or not pay any taxes or whatever, but you don't get to act on those beliefs. Surely someone as educated as the good bishop is well aware of this rather basic point.

7 posted on 05/28/2013 8:20:32 AM PDT by Zeta Beam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow

Any Religion that harms of kills apostates should be considered a dangerous cult and should be trated as such.

Any Religion that uses the treat of physical violence to convert people to it should be considered a dangerous cult and should be trated as such.

Any Religion that considers members of another Religion as less than human should be considered a dangerous cult and should be trated as such.

You get where I am going here.....


8 posted on 05/28/2013 8:25:36 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson