Proof that Progressives Hate Catholic Schools and Homeschooling Families

NC Register ^ | April 7, 2013 | Matthew Archbold

[NYer]

All Your Kids Are Belong To Us, Love NBC.

The only time anyone at MSNBC interests me is when they actually say things that the left believes wholeheartedly but know that actually verbalizing it would mean a p.r. disaster. This is an MSNBC commercial. And it should scare any parent that watches it.

MSNBC personality Melissa Harris-Perry says, according to the transcript from Newsbusters, "We have to break through our kind of private idea that kids belong to their parents or kids belong to their families and recognize that kids belong to their communities."

Wait, what!?

Sarah Palin tweeted that it was "Unflippingbelievable." But here's the thing - it's absolutely believable. For years, a mantra of the left has been "it takes a village to raise a child." Maybe what they meant was "The village takes the child to raise."

And just so we're all on the same page. Whose kids are the ones that need to be pulled in to the community? You think it's the kids of secular progressives? Nah. It's you and yours. You see, secularists aren't happy just to teach their young their "bright" ways. No. They want, they need your children as well mainly because you evil pro-lifers keep having so many darn kids.

The media and the public school systems are the greatest vehicles of indoctrination for the progressive worldview. How long do you think they're going to be ok with homeschoolers? How long will they be ok with Catholic schools filling kids heads with hate about traditional marriage and life beginning at conception? Not too much longer, right?

I just have to ask a pretty basic question. When does the community start having a say in family decisions? I'm serious.

[NYer]

Ping!

[BobL]

I just hope that there aren’t any FReepers left that REALLY THINK the Democrats are ok with parents actually raising their own kids.

Yes, they tolerate it, while they quickly chip away at it.

[C. Edmund Wright]

So true, and this article proves that for liberals, education is about indoctrination. If that were not the case, liberals would LOVE homeschoolers and others, who pay taxes to the public schools but do not burden the system.

[Spartan302]

In the age of very small and openly available video recording devices either in a smartphone, tablet of other devices I bet it will become a cultural fad for students to rebel against the communist/liberal progressive teachers by secretly recording their rituals and posting it on social video sites.

We see it already from Jesus stomping to Sharia law enforcement but I think its going to explode nationwide against the educational system.

The kids are NOT dummies, they know for the most part who the bad guys are no matter how much its sugar coated.

[silverleaf]

Dear liberals,

If kids belong to “us” then “we” demand they stop being butchered and aborted

[Graewoulf]

Tyrant Kim Un Hussein must be very pleased that his efforts to “FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” are progressing so easily.

[annalex]

My post on another thread:

"Those people who truly believe that the potential life inherent in a fetus is equivalent to the actualized life of an infant have argued that the community has a distinct interest in children no matter what the mother’s and father’s interests or needs...."

On top of a falsity: that children belong to the state she adds a libel: that the pro-life movement is anti-abortion because we want children as a state fodder.

At the root of it is the stratagem from time to time exploited by the Left: that because the Nazis were anti-abortion so therefore we are Nazis. Similarly and with the same "logic" one could claim that because Nazis punished street crime, your local DA is a Nazi.

Indeed, among the totalitarian regimes we can find some that allow abortion and also some that forbid it. Alsoo some, like Stalin's Soviet Union, sometime allowed it and sometime forbade it. In a totalitarian state attitude to abortion is a function of the state's need for soldiers balanced with the same state's ability to feed the starving population. In Nazi Germany, starvation was never a problem, so abortion was seen as detriment to the state; in the Soviet Union the population was starving so the state saw children as a liability and allowed abortion. None of that has anything to do with the reasoning or the motivation of the pro-life movement.

The slanderer should be asked to name these anonymous pro-lifers she "learned" from.

[RHS Jr]

Lately, I keep seeing all this zombie stuff; maybe they are being produced in the government schools!

[baddog 219]

[Biggirl]

Revolt is coming.

[Biggirl]

Rush Limbaugh just mentioned this.

[RobbyS]

The socialist experiments of the early 19th century all emphasized taking the children away from their birth parents and putting them into child care.