Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

11 Reasons the Authority of Christianity Is Centered on St. Peter and Rome
stpeterslist ^ | December 19, 2012

Posted on 01/06/2013 3:56:49 PM PST by NYer

Bl. John Henry Newman said it best: “To be deep in history is to cease to be Protestant.” History paints an overwhelming picture of St. Peter’s apostolic ministry in Rome and this is confirmed by a multitude of different sources within the Early Church. Catholic Encyclopedia states, “In opposition to this distinct and unanimous testimony of early Christendom, some few Protestant historians have attempted in recent times to set aside the residence and death of Peter at Rome as legendary. These attempts have resulted in complete failure.” Protestantism as a whole seeks to divorce Christianity from history by rending Gospel message out of its historical context as captured by our Early Church Fathers. One such target of these heresies is to devalue St. Peter and to twist the authority of Rome into a historical mishap within Christianity. To wit, the belief has as its end the ultimate end of all Catholic and Protestant dialogue – who has authority in Christianity?

 

Why is it important to defend the tradition of St. Peter and Rome?
The importance of establishing St. Peter’s ministry in Rome may be boiled down to authority and more specifically the historic existence and continuance of the Office of Vicar held by St. Peter. To understand why St. Peter was important and what authority was given to him by Christ SPL has composed two lists – 10 Biblical Reasons Christ Founded the Papacy and 13 Reasons St. Peter Was the Prince of the Apostles.

The rest of the list is cited from the Catholic Encyclopedia on St. Peter and represents only a small fraction of the evidence set therein.

 

The Apostolic Primacy of St. Peter and Rome

It is an indisputably established historical fact that St. Peter laboured in Rome during the last portion of his life, and there ended his earthly course by martyrdom. As to the duration of his Apostolic activity in the Roman capital, the continuity or otherwise of his residence there, the details and success of his labours, and the chronology of his arrival and death, all these questions are uncertain, and can be solved only on hypotheses more or less well-founded. The essential fact is that Peter died at Rome: this constitutes the historical foundation of the claim of the Bishops of Rome to the Apostolic Primacy of Peter.

St. Peter’s residence and death in Rome are established beyond contention as historical facts by a series of distinct testimonies extending from the end of the first to the end of the second centuries, and issuing from several lands.

 

1. The Gospel of St. John

That the manner, and therefore the place of his death, must have been known in widely extended Christian circles at the end of the first century is clear from the remark introduced into the Gospel of St. John concerning Christ’s prophecy that Peter was bound to Him and would be led whither he would not — “And this he said, signifying by what death he should glorify God” (John 21:18-19, see above). Such a remark presupposes in the readers of the Fourth Gospel a knowledge of the death of Peter.

 

2. Salutations, from Babylon

St. Peter’s First Epistle was written almost undoubtedly from Rome, since the salutation at the end reads: “The church that is in Babylon, elected together with you, saluteth you: and so doth my son Mark” (5:13). Babylon must here be identified with the Roman capital; since Babylon on the Euphrates, which lay in ruins, or New Babylon (Seleucia) on the Tigris, or the Egyptian Babylon near Memphis, or Jerusalem cannot be meant, the reference must be to Rome, the only city which is called Babylon elsewhere in ancient Christian literature (Revelation 17:5; 18:10; “Oracula Sibyl.”, V, verses 143 and 159, ed. Geffcken, Leipzig, 1902, 111).

 

3. Gospel of St. Mark

From Bishop Papias of Hierapolis and Clement of Alexandria, who both appeal to the testimony of the old presbyters (i.e., the disciples of the Apostles), we learn that Mark wrote his Gospel in Rome at the request of the Roman Christians, who desired a written memorial of the doctrine preached to them by St. Peter and his disciples (Eusebius, Church History II.15, 3.40, 6.14); this is confirmed by Irenaeus (Against Heresies 3.1). In connection with this information concerning the Gospel of St. Mark, Eusebius, relying perhaps on an earlier source, says that Peter described Rome figuratively as Babylon in his First Epistle.

 

4. Testimony of Pope St. Clement I

Another testimony concerning the martyrdom of Peter and Paul is supplied by Clement of Rome in his Epistle to the Corinthians (written about A.D. 95-97), wherein he says (chapter 5):

“Through zeal and cunning the greatest and most righteous supports [of the Church] have suffered persecution and been warred to death. Let us place before our eyes the good Apostles — St. Peter, who in consequence of unjust zeal, suffered not one or two, but numerous miseries, and, having thus given testimony (martyresas), has entered the merited place of glory”.

He then mentions Paul and a number of elect, who were assembled with the others and suffered martyrdom “among us” (en hemin, i.e., among the Romans, the meaning that the expression also bears in chapter 4). He is speaking undoubtedly, as the whole passage proves, of the Neronian persecution, and thus refers the martyrdom of Peter and Paul to that epoch.

 

5. Testimony of St. Ignatius of Antioch

In his letter written at the beginning of the second century (before 117), while being brought to Rome for martyrdom, the venerable Bishop Ignatius of Antioch endeavours by every means to restrain the Roman Christians from striving for his pardon, remarking: “I issue you no commands, like Peter and Paul: they were Apostles, while I am but a captive” (Epistle to the Romans 4). The meaning of this remark must be that the two Apostles laboured personally in Rome, and with Apostolic authority preached the Gospel there.

 

6. Taught in the Same Place in Italy

Bishop Dionysius of Corinth, in his letter to the Roman Church in the time of Pope Soter (165-74), says:

“You have therefore by your urgent exhortation bound close together the sowing of Peter and Paul at Rome and Corinth. For both planted the seed of the Gospel also in Corinth, and together instructed us, just as they likewise taught in the same place in Italy and at the same time suffered martyrdom” (in Eusebius, Church History II.25).

 

 

7. Rome: Founded by Sts. Peter and Paul

Irenaeus of Lyons, a native of Asia Minor and a disciple of Polycarp of Smyrna (a disciple of St. John), passed a considerable time in Rome shortly after the middle of the second century, and then proceeded to Lyons, where he became bishop in 177; he described the Roman Church as the most prominent and chief preserver of the Apostolic tradition, as “the greatest and most ancient church, known by all, founded and organized at Rome by the two most glorious Apostles, Peter and Paul” (Against Heresies 3.3; cf. 3.1). He thus makes use of the universally known and recognized fact of the Apostolic activity of Peter and Paul in Rome, to find therein a proof from tradition against the heretics.

 

8. St. Peter Announced the Word of God in Rome

In his “Hypotyposes” (Eusebius, Church History IV.14), Clement of Alexandria, teacher in the catechetical school of that city from about 190, says on the strength of the tradition of the presbyters: “After Peter had announced the Word of God in Rome and preached the Gospel in the spirit of God, the multitude of hearers requested Mark, who had long accompanied Peter on all his journeys, to write down what the Apostles had preached to them” (see above).

 

9. Rome: Where Authority is Ever Within Reach

Like Irenaeus, Tertullian appeals, in his writings against heretics, to the proof afforded by the Apostolic labours of Peter and Paul in Rome of the truth of ecclesiastical tradition. In De Præscriptione 36, he says:

“If thou art near Italy, thou hast Rome where authority is ever within reach. How fortunate is this Church for which the Apostles have poured out their whole teaching with their blood, where Peter has emulated the Passion of the Lord, where Paul was crowned with the death of John.”

In Scorpiace 15, he also speaks of Peter’s crucifixion. “The budding faith Nero first made bloody in Rome. There Peter was girded by another, since he was bound to the cross”. As an illustration that it was immaterial with what water baptism is administered, he states in his book (On Baptism 5) that there is “no difference between that with which John baptized in the Jordan and that with which Peter baptized in the Tiber”; and against Marcion he appeals to the testimony of the Roman Christians, “to whom Peter and Paul have bequeathed the Gospel sealed with their blood” (Against Marcion 4.5).

 

10. Come to the Vatican and See for Yourself

The Roman, Caius, who lived in Rome in the time of Pope Zephyrinus (198-217), wrote in his “Dialogue with Proclus” (in Eusebius, Church History II.25) directed against the Montanists: “But I can show the trophies of the Apostles. If you care to go to the Vatican or to the road to Ostia, thou shalt find the trophies of those who have founded this Church”.

By the trophies (tropaia) Eusebius understands the graves of the Apostles, but his view is opposed by modern investigators who believe that the place of execution is meant. For our purpose it is immaterial which opinion is correct, as the testimony retains its full value in either case. At any rate the place of execution and burial of both were close together; St. Peter, who was executed on the Vatican, received also his burial there. Eusebius also refers to “the inscription of the names of Peter and Paul, which have been preserved to the present day on the burial-places there” (i.e. at Rome).

 

11. Ancient Epigraphic Memorial

There thus existed in Rome an ancient epigraphic memorial commemorating the death of the Apostles. The obscure notice in the Muratorian Fragment (“Lucas optime theofile conprindit quia sub praesentia eius singula gerebantur sicuti et semote passionem petri evidenter declarat”, ed. Preuschen, Tübingen, 1910, p. 29) also presupposes an ancient definite tradition concerning Peter’s death in Rome.

The apocryphal Acts of St. Peter and the Acts of Sts. Peter and Paul likewise belong to the series of testimonies of the death of the two Apostles in Rome.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History
KEYWORDS: churchhistory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 3,021-3,033 next last
To: Iscool

You say you will stick with the Scriptures.

Who are the apostles listed in the Bible?

To whom did Christ say, “Feed my lambs.”, “Tend my sheep.”, “Feed my sheep.” It’s in Scripture — Christ said these to Peter.

To whom did Christ give the Keys to the Kingdom? It’s in Scripture?


41 posted on 01/06/2013 5:33:50 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: narses
Catholic doctrine today is nothing more than a slight of hand, a shell game in which the Early Fathers preached one thing but altered by the Church over the centuries ever so slightly to conform with their world view. Yet all the while Catholics maintain a pretense that they go back 2,000 years. One simply has to look at the division of the Eastern Church from the Western Church. Now the Church of Rome embraces the semi-Pelagius views of the Eastern Orthodox. Rome has left it's first love. If anything, TRUE Protestant (not what we have today) is the remnant of what the Early Church Fathers taught.

Sounds like Sola Scriptura to me. Would you agree with Jerome's statement?

From New Advent on the doctrine of the atonement:

Wow, such a statement. The Early Church Fathers SPECULATED on the meaning of the atonement. Yet 1800 years later they finally got it right.

And then the Church has the ADDACIDY to say they follow the Early Church Fathers. HA!

42 posted on 01/06/2013 5:34:17 PM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: narses

It saddens me that you are incapable of reading and interpreting Scripture. It was written for all, to be embraced by all. It’s not reserved for Church leadership alone.


43 posted on 01/06/2013 5:34:20 PM PST by Theo (May Christ be exalted above all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

Who carries on the work of Christ in the Book of Acts? The Apostles, Peter, etc.

It’s in Scripture.

Are you forgetting these things from Scripture?


44 posted on 01/06/2013 5:35:39 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Your misunderstanding of the Christian faith is astounding. Perhaps before commenting on the Christian faith, you should become familiar with it. Start with the New Testament.

Just trying to “keep it real.”


45 posted on 01/06/2013 5:36:21 PM PST by Theo (May Christ be exalted above all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

Cool! They posted to you the YOPIOS cereal box. The true sign of desperation when they can no longer argue and have to resort to insults. You can consider that a win on your part.


46 posted on 01/06/2013 5:37:49 PM PST by BipolarBob (Happy Hunger Games! May the odds be ever in your favor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; Iscool

Yes, Jesus’ close friends carried on His work.

Those of us who are now embraced by Christ as His friends carry on His work.


47 posted on 01/06/2013 5:39:09 PM PST by Theo (May Christ be exalted above all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: svcw

**I dare not trust the sweetest frame,
But wholly lean on Jesus’ name.**

Did Jesus trust Peter? Of course, Jesus told Peter to tend his sheep, feed his lambs, feed his sheep.

Is that in your Bible?


48 posted on 01/06/2013 5:39:53 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob; Iscool

That YOPIOS cereal box betrays their belief that we common Christ-followers are unable to understand Scripture. Sad that they consider God’s Word beyond their grasp.


49 posted on 01/06/2013 5:40:44 PM PST by Theo (May Christ be exalted above all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
To whom did Christ give the Keys to the Kingdom?

What is the significance of the Keys and when are they used and how?

50 posted on 01/06/2013 5:40:58 PM PST by BipolarBob (Happy Hunger Games! May the odds be ever in your favor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; Iscool; metmom; CynicalBear; mitch5501; boatbums
Why did Christ choose 12 Apostles? And why was it imperative that the 12th (after Judas went to his own) be chosen before Pentecost? Why are there 12 thrones (besides Christ's) in the Kingdom? ANd where does that leave Paul? Sitting on a stool by the fireplace, little crutch hanging by the fire, hoping for just a little more soup, please?

It's in Scripture...

51 posted on 01/06/2013 5:43:11 PM PST by smvoice (Better Buck up, Buttercup. The wailing and gnashing are for an eternity..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Theo; BipolarBob; Iscool

>> “ Sad that they consider God’s Word beyond their grasp.”

.
Truly!

God’s word was given to the people, not to powerful nicolaitan rulers.


52 posted on 01/06/2013 5:43:38 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Theo

And the apostles, the first priests and Bishops started it. They were ordained, (breathed on) by Christ before he ascended into heaven.

All Christian churches receive their teaching from the Catholic Church and the Catholic Bible. Trouble is that Luther threw out some of the Bible that proves this.


53 posted on 01/06/2013 5:44:23 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Theo

“It saddens me that you are incapable of reading and interpreting Scripture.”

ROTFLMAO! It has been through the study of Holy Scripture and prayer that I became a Catholic.

“It was written for all, to be embraced by all.”

And before Holy Scripture was written, after his resurrection Christ gives this mission to his apostles: “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you.”

“It’s not reserved for Church leadership alone.”

And yet before the first pen set down the first words of the Gospel, the Apostles were doing the work of Our Lord, and through that work they appointed successors who assembled and defended the Holy Writ you refer to.


54 posted on 01/06/2013 5:44:23 PM PST by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: NYer

“But ye have made it a den of thieves”


55 posted on 01/06/2013 5:44:38 PM PST by conserv8 (It's not the end, it's the beginning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theo

Your misunderstanding of the Christian faith is astounding. Perhaps before commenting on the Christian faith, you should become familiar with it. Start with the New Testament.


56 posted on 01/06/2013 5:45:24 PM PST by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

Who guards the gate of heaven? Have you never thought about this before?


57 posted on 01/06/2013 5:45:36 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Right on!

Hang in there.


58 posted on 01/06/2013 5:45:36 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Did you sing old hymns in your church? That’s where those lines come from.

Because Jesus may have or may not have trusted Peter does not give Peter higher authority that the living Christ.

You are of course by free will, able to think otherwise.


59 posted on 01/06/2013 5:45:49 PM PST by svcw (Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Tell us again about Church on Sunday, celebrating Easter and Christmas and why these common Christian works are wrong. Go ahead, enlighten us.


60 posted on 01/06/2013 5:47:18 PM PST by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 3,021-3,033 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson