Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

United Nations Calls Access to Birth Control a “Human Right”
Life Site News ^ | 11/14/12 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 11/15/2012 7:28:05 AM PST by marshmallow

The United Nation’s Population Fund has issued an annual report describing access to birth control and contraception as a “universal human right” for “women and adolescents.”

The is the first time the UN agency has labeled birth control a right, although the report is not legally binding on any nations and does not affect or alter the laws of any country in any way. Still, the declaration is a concern for pro-life advocates, who are worried it is the first step towards the United Nations attempting to make abortion an international right.

In its report, the UNFPA also indicated it would spent another $4.1 billion on promoting contraception throughout the world — even though many of the poorest nations in the world are battling a need for basic food and water, shelter, and medicine. According to the Associated Press, the U.S. pays for 22 percent of the $5.15 billion budget for the UN.

Dr. Janice Shaw Crouse, Ph.D., Director and Senior Fellow of Concerned Women for America’s Beverly LaHaye Institute, respond to the new report in comments to LifeNews.

“The UNFPA report is based on the proclamation that family planning is a ‘human right.’ It bluntly states that ‘ensuring universal access’ to family planning means challenging traditional and local practices – another way of saying that any disagreement is to be squelched, and that freedom of religion and freedom of speech are irrelevant when family planning ‘rights’ are at stake,” she said. “The UNFPA goals are justified by claiming that reducing unintended pregnancies would mean fewer abortions.”

Crouse continued: “Throughout the report, words like ‘all’ and ‘everyone’ pile up as the UNFPA declares their intent that ‘everyone’ in ‘all’ nations has a ‘human right’ for family planning and nothing can stand in the way of implementing UNFPA’s family planning goals.....

(Excerpt) Read more at lifenews.com ...


TOPICS: Current Events; General Discusssion; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: birthcontrol; moralabsolutes; un; unfpa; unitednations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 11/15/2012 7:28:12 AM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Rights cannot come in the form of a product. This whole concept is going to be the death of us as a country.


2 posted on 11/15/2012 7:30:01 AM PST by ilgipper (Obama supporters are comprised of the uninformed & the ill-informed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
...But I don't want to pay for you're family planning.
3 posted on 11/15/2012 7:30:16 AM PST by VaRepublican (I would propagate taglines but I don't know how. But bloggers do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Unbelievable!

Why is the UN so preoccupied with peoples sex lives but so adamant that we cannot decapitate their governments that are keeping them in such depraved environments.


4 posted on 11/15/2012 7:35:39 AM PST by vet7279
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

You have the right to keep your pecker in your pants, and hold your knees together.

You can have no right to some other person’s wealth, property, or labor.


5 posted on 11/15/2012 7:35:59 AM PST by mbarker12474 (If thine enemy offend thee, give his childe a drum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

how is that..if they weren’t born with it?


6 posted on 11/15/2012 7:38:44 AM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

If some woman wants 15 children, does her right to family planning allow her to compel me to provide the, uh, servicing and product?

Does my right to family planning allow me to compel a woman of my choice to perform impregnation services with me and carry my issue?


7 posted on 11/15/2012 7:40:33 AM PST by mbarker12474 (If thine enemy offend thee, give his childe a drum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

I favor free sterilization for anyone who wants it. Where’s the downside to paying a little to have another Democrat spayed?


8 posted on 11/15/2012 7:42:52 AM PST by Trod Upon (Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbarker12474

That’s debatable at the UN...


9 posted on 11/15/2012 7:45:03 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (In the game of life, there are no betting limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Trod Upon

Oh, come on! Spaying is what you do to a pet! Who’d want a Democrat as a pet?


10 posted on 11/15/2012 7:47:04 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

Hey, you can also euthanize them when they go rabid.


11 posted on 11/15/2012 8:00:16 AM PST by Trod Upon (Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Laughable. It’s not a right, it’s a responsibility.


12 posted on 11/15/2012 8:08:46 AM PST by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Sure UN, you can go and spread that ‘right’ FIRST in the Islamic countries.
I dare you.


13 posted on 11/15/2012 8:26:20 AM PST by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trod Upon

They don’t come that way already?


14 posted on 11/15/2012 8:51:23 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow; 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

This isn't about "rights" being access to a "product". It's about limiting population, for one thing - and since contraception never works all the time, the next "right" is abortion. And then killing the useless eaters. It's also about changing the moral standards from sex within marriage to a hedonist frenzy free for all, thus ruining stable families all over the world.

15 posted on 11/15/2012 4:00:26 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: marshmallow

It’s simple: There’s no such thing as a “right” to do wrong. I think it is in Romans where Paul teaches that human beings are not allowed to do evil that good may come from it.


17 posted on 11/15/2012 5:16:45 PM PST by MDLION ("Trust in the Lord with all your heart" -Proverbs 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo

Since when is using contraception a responsibility? That implies that not using contraception is irresponsible.


18 posted on 11/15/2012 6:21:08 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Since when is using contraception a responsibility? That implies that not using contraception is irresponsible.

It's responsible to use a contraceptive when you don't want a pregnancy. It's irresponsible to not use a contraceptive when you don't want a pregnancy -- except in the case where not using a contraceptive because of religious beliefs. Then it is neither since ostensibly the couple will accept whatever befalls them. I.E it's unlikely that people not using contraceptives for religious reasons would then use abortion as a form of contraceptive.

So no, your inference is wrong because your inference is incomplete.

19 posted on 11/15/2012 7:32:03 PM PST by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

Exactly. So called “positive” rights are always an assault on someone’s negative rights(the only true rights there are.)


20 posted on 11/15/2012 8:20:27 PM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson